On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 03:56:11PM +0100, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > The only thing I can tell to reassure you is that NSPR and NSS have
> > strong ABI stability requirements, since they are used by closed-source
> > products such as SunOne, so we're probably safe here. OTOH, NS
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 08:57:19PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:39:46AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > I'll let the RMs decide whether iceape and icedove upgrades are less
> > problematic since they don't involve
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 02:09:59PM +0100, Rik Theys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> RHEL updated seamonkey and seamonkey-nss from 1.0.7 to 1.0.8 and this
> caused quite a lot of breakage: evolution no longer started and gaim
> crashes.
Interesting, considering 1.0.8 is still at release can
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 08:46:02AM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 08:57:19PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:39:46AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > I'll let the
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:28:51AM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1.
> http://web.glandium.org/debian/repository/unstable/xulrunner_1.8.0.10-1_i386.changes
It's even better with the source
http://web.glandium.org/debian/repository/unstable/xulrunner_1.8.0.10-1.d
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 11:29:13PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Mozilla has released security updates for its 1.8 and 1.8.0 branches,
> > respectively 1.8.1.2 (for Firefox 2.0.0.2)
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 11:42:36PM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you need assistance in the patch reviewing, I can lend a hand and
> explain the rationale behind them if necessary.
... for the Debian changes, obviously.
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:13:37PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> I would love to see an upload to unstable before you start with that
> >> work, so that we can get a releasable version of
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:15:23PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Mar 06, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I urge you to reconsider severity of this problem. There's another
> > situation
> > that makes it much worse:
> The correct solution is to make d-i use labels i
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:38:02PM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can find the changelog here:
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-mozilla/iceweasel/trunk/debian/changelog?op=file&rev=0&sc=0
FWIW:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ svn diff
file:///svn/pkg-mozilla/iceweas
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 06:05:09PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:38:02PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:13:37PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> > > Eric Dorland <[EMAIL P
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 01:26:47PM +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:05:09PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Mar 07, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Labels are not well tested and a source of problems indeed.
> > The /dev/disk/by-
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:28:09PM -0500, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
> > I urge you to reconsider severity of this problem. There's another
> > situation
> > that makes it much worse:
> >
> > - User boots off USB stick
> > - sda is USB, sdb is SCSI
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 01:07:53PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> tags 413964 sid
> thanks
>
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 01:37:49PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > If the gcj plugin is making use of xpcom, it should require xulrunner-xpcom
&
clone 413964 -1
reassign -1 classpath
thanks
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 11:26:59PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 01:07:53PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL
> >
clone 413964 -1
reassign -1 pcmanx-gtk2
severity -1 important
severity 414106 important
clone 413964 -2
reassign 413964 xulrunner
severity -2 important
thanks
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 07:38:12AM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 11:26:59PM +0100,
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 01:32:37PM +0100, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just uploaded evolution/2.6.3-6 (prepared by Oystein Gisnas with a
> patch reviewed by Mike Hommey) fixing support for S-MIME which broke
> silently (see #408548)
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:32:27AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Are the iceape and iceweasel l10n APIs identical? Are the contents of the
> > packages identical?
>
> Well, two different packages cannot be identical anyway, but iceape-l10n
> and iceweasel-l10n are very
Hi,
I would like to know, since the release is now very close, if there
could be a final upload of the mozilla-based products.
I have 2 main concerns:
- A patch (stolen from redhat) that we apply leads to bugs such as
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370386
http://bugs.debian.org/
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 08:26:55AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know, since the release is now very close, if there
> could be a final upload of the mozilla-based products.
>
> I have 2 main concerns:
> - A patch (stolen from redhat) that we apply
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:53:28AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070314 08:27]:
> > - Apply the new version of the patch, that I sent to
> > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=258000, see the
> > interdiff with the pre
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 04:26:18AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 08:26:55AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > I would like to know, since the release is now very close, if there
> > could be a final upload of the mozilla-based products.
>
> Note that ice
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 04:26:18AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > - Upstream is releasing a regression fix release that fixes the
> > following issues:
> > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370559
> > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371576
> >
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 04:26:18AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 08:26:55AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > I would like to know, since the release is now very close, if there
> > could be a final upload of the mozilla-based pro
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:19:21AM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 04:26:18AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 08:26:55AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > I would like to know, si
Hi all,
I uploaded version 2.0.0.3-1 of iceweasel, that fixes the last bits I
was talking about in my last messages. Unfortunately, Eric pointed me to
something I forgot: update the copyright file with information about
file removals from the .orig.tar.gz, though they are documented in the
changel
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 03:46:49AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 08:41:26AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > I uploaded version 2.0.0.3-1 of iceweasel, that fixes the last bits I
> > was talking about in my last messages.
>
Hi,
I uploaded what I believe will be the last version of xulrunner
targetted for etch. It includes the changes we discussed earlier,
plus some minor trivial fixes (debugging symbols and correct
component registration for python-xpcom).
I also uploaded a new version of tabextensions dropping supp
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:19:48PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-24 20:40]:
> > I uploaded what I believe will be the last version of xulrunner
> > targetted for etch. It includes the changes we discu
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 03:27:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:19:48PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-24 20:40]:
> > > I uploaded what I believe will be the last versio
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 09:21:42AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyways, 1.8.0.11-2 uploaded, with a new tabextensions, too, that
> removes "Iceweasel" from the description. You may want to unblock both.
xulrunner got in, many thanks. Could you also hint
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 12:53:34PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - there *is* downtime, a new kernel needs to be installed and that requires
> a reboot
Also note daemons tend to stop in preinst and start in postinst, which,
when a lot of packages are upgrade
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 10:27:10PM +0200, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> As for missinformation, I'm not sure what the general tendency would be, but
> could it be that a lot of our users are unaware of 64-bit capability in
> their cpu? I haven't been following lately on how skilled/e
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt didn't write:
> Heya,
>
> The release team is currently working on a schedule for the lenny
> release cycle. For that, we want to gather some data from the bigger
> software packaging teams in Debian first.
>
> We would like to know which major upstream versions of Mozilla
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 08:19:55PM +0200, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 08:51:52AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt didn't write:
> >
> > The currently known upstream plans are the following:
&g
Hi,
Due to a mistake in nspr's shlibs, dependencies got wrong on autobuilt
nss packages (being all but i386 binaries). The i386 binaries are fine
because they were built against an older version of libnspr4-0d, which
had the correct shlibs. Could you trigger binNMUs to be built against
libnspr4-de
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 06:09:55PM -0300, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Ok. This means that the actual upgrade from grub1 to grub2 should be
> > totally safe for all users by default, because grub-install is not
> > automatically run, yes?
>
> Yes. It won't change the system unt
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 01:25:39PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> [-- You may want as a background to this question to read #428655. --]
>
> We have users that still run etch with 2.4 kernels. Though, when
> they'll upgrade to lenny, it will completely destroy their upgrade
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 02:13:50PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> that's the point of my question. The 2.6 kernel in etch do not depends
> upon a 2.5 libc. the ones in unstable do. So in order to upgrade the
> libc to upstable one, you _have_ to install an etch 2.6.18 first.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may
> miss another backport from the trunk.
>
> Side note: gcc-snapshot currently cannot be built due to the too
> strict dependencies on the binar
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:02:45PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mike Hommey writes:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 200706
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:21:37PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mike Hommey writes:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:02:45PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Mike Hommey writes:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 13,
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 10:05:47PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have prepared an apache2 update for etch r1. It fixes two RC bugs
> and adds some missing documentation. Here is the changelog:
>
> apache2 (2.2.3-4+etch1) stable; urgency=low
>
> * Comment out Ca
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 12:56:26PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Anyways, changing this won't solve the problem with new xulrunner
> > upstream releases... and the real problem is still on the ftp archive
> > anyways...
>
> I very much doubt that for subsubminor version cha
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may
> miss another backport from the trunk.
Did someone check already ?
> Side note: gcc-snapshot currently cannot be built due to the too
> stric
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:33:01AM +0200, Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 10:16 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> > Does any port still need to stick with GCC 4.1 for a while? Feedback
> > from hppa, mips*, s390, powerpc, amd64, i386 porters doesn't show
> > objec
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 03:25:58AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 12:05:54PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:51:47AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > I have another objection. I'd like all m
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 09:23:29PM +0100, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > * The cost of disabling IPv6
> >
> > Once the kernel has loaded the ipv6 module, one can not get it rmmod'ed
> > (or not easily - I have not figured out how to do this remotely on a
> > hosted server). Whi
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 10:33:10PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've never actually had a problem on ipv4-only hosts. It would be nice
> if you could describe your problems in more detail.
The typical problem, which is what Tomas was pointing at with
request being done bef
Hi,
Please binNMU git-core to build it against docbook-xsl 0.73.1.dfsg.1-1,
which will fix #420114.
Cheers,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:24:59AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:47:25PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > Please binNMU git-core to build it against docbook-xsl 0.73.1.dfsg.1-1,
> > which will fix #420114.
>
> On what
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 06:55:11PM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 02:00:18AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Packages that have a test-suite should always call it. Most
> > autotool-ed packages have a "check" target to run and that's it. It
> > would
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:33:31AM +, brian m. carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> [CC'd to debian-mips.]
>
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:27:20PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:55:53PM +0200, Mike H
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 08:11:07AM +0200, Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Please remove dosemu-freedos version 1:0.0.b9r5a-3 from Stable.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=442208
Isn't it simply possible to remove the rerror source and binary ?
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 02:32:52PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> ICU 3.8 was released yesterday. I've had a "draft" release, as they
> call it, in experimental for a while. ICU 3.8 is supposed to be
> source compatible with earlier releases, but I have changed the dev
> p
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 07:53:34PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-23 17:13]:
> > I don't completely know how to proceed here. (And is this the
> > appropriate place?)
>
> The s390 autobuilder should stop building with 's390x' as uname.
> waldi has been
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 08:04:27PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Please note that they can all be binNMUed after python2.5 has become the
> default, but all of them will have to migrate to testing at once. We
> must make this list shorter unless we want this transition to recall bad
> memories t
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 07:37:59AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:33:31AM +, brian m. carlson <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [CC'd to debian-mips.]
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:27:20PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > &g
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 11:13:46AM +, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 07:37:59AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:33:31AM +, brian m. carlson <[EMAIL
> > > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > &g
Hi,
Despite #451464 making xulrunner unbuildable with latest libgtk because
of libgtk's removal of --enable-explicit-deps from configure, please
consider hinting both xulrunner and nspr. The transition has been
waiting for too long already.
Also note #451464 applies on the version in testing.
Mik
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 12:37:03AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 09:00:57AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > Despite #451464 making xulrunner unbuildable with latest libgtk because
> > of libgtk's removal of --enable-explicit-deps from configu
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 12:37:03AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 09:00:57AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > Despite #451464 making xulrunner unbuildable with latest libgtk because
> > of libgtk's removal of --enable-explicit-deps from configu
Hi release managers,
I would like to dump libsoftokn3.so.0d from the libnss3-0d package,
because it is not a real library. Formerly, reverse dependencies had to
link against it, because it wouldn't be loaded automatically. At some
time, upstream made libnss3.so link against it, so that rdeps would
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 10:43:17AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Hi release managers,
>
> I would like to dump libsoftokn3.so.0d from the libnss3-0d package,
> because it is not a real library. Formerly, reverse dependencies had to
> link against it, because it wouldn't be load
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 03:55:31PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 01:44:05PM +, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 05:55:29PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > rebuilding Boost as-is would require a new Boost transition. Could
> >
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:53:50PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > As per release goal, gnome 1.x won't be shipped in Lenny. I just started
> > a first round of bugs (severity important for now), with user/usertag
> > debian-release@lists.debian.org/gnome-1.x-removal s
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 02:30:30PM +0100, Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
> according to http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?packages=libvirt
> libvirt has not been tried on anything except i386 and amd64. The same
> says http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=libvirt. Why i
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 05:17:08PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 07:56:55PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> >> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 07:56:55PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >
> > Hello RM and SRM teams,
> >
> > I hereby ask for a block on linux-2.6 source package until d-i Beta1
> > gets out. If it migrates before we do the final images we can need to
>
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 10:02:22PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Matthias Klose writes:
> > For all ports besides alpha and hppa we plan to make GCC-4.3 the
> > default compilers for lenny.
>
> amd64 and i386 side note: the gcc-4.3 4.3.0-2 upload has a patch
> reenabling the cld instruction when
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 10:00:19AM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> At 1207707291 time_t, Doug Bell wrote:
> > The new Debian package for awesome version 2.3~rc1-1 has a bug. With
> > the version of libcairo2 in unstable (1.4.14), it fails to load, giving
> > an error message: "undefined symbol cair
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 05:40:05PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:55:36AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Moritz Muehlenhoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080410 23:31]:
> > > There are only three packages left, which build depend on libxml-dev
> > > (r-cran-xml and cadaver
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 08:52:55PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Effect of such a defined transition:
> If someone does a *sourceful* upload it will get rejected with a message
> similar to
> --88---
> feta: part of the apt_update transition
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:21:49AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > Here's what I would like to suggest as acceptable for lenny (and thus
> > > 1.14.19):
> >
> > Freeze guidelines are not really up to discussion and I don't like that
> > maintainers of ke
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 05:33:48PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> but we still have 5 months to find them.
Is Lenny already delayed ?
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 01:57:49PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > And most of the bugs have been filed within days, and
> > fixed already. It's possible that some packages were broken in more
> > subtle ways not resulting in a build failure, but we still have 5 months
> > to fi
Hi everyone[1],
Here is a status update for xulrunner 1.9, and what remains to be done
to be ready for what we would like to be in Lenny.
In the past few weeks, I've uploaded several beta releases of xulrunner
to experimental, with the latest one, 1.9~b5-4 (in NEW) being more-or-less
in its final
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 09:30:16AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Hi everyone[1],
>
> Here is a status update for xulrunner 1.9, and what remains to be done
> to be ready for what we would like to be in Lenny.
(...)
Here is the timeline I will try to follow for this transition (I'
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 02:57:23PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Please delay the xulrunner transition until the current gcj-4.2 and
> gcj-4.3 are in testing
When is that going to happen ?
> , or else you couple the move of those packages
> to testing to the xulrunner transition. At the same tim
Hi,
Here is a status update for the coming xulrunner 1.9 transition.
Bugs have been files to follow necessary updates on the reverse
dependencies. The list can be seen with the following url:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=xulrunner-transition;[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
You'll note 10
Hi,
I'm taking advantage of the fact I have temporary ADSL synchronization
to send this message. Unfortunately, I don't know how long it will last,
nor when the service will be properly repaired.
Anyways, As gcj-4.x have now transitioned, it's time for xulrunner
transition. Unfortunately, without
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 10:15:50PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080607 09:08]:
> > - I upload both iceweasel and xulrunner rc2 releases to unstable, after
> > I'm ready to upload them, and after you tell me I can go on, if m
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 08:44:07AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> The timing could have been slightly better... I had time to prepare
> iceweasel 3.0~rc2-1 and upload it on gluck (you can find it on
> http://people.debian.org/~glandium/, signed and ready to upload, but it
> requires xulr
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 09:42:53AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 08:44:07AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > The timing could have been slightly better... I had time to prepare
> > iceweasel 3.0~rc2-1 and upload it on gluck (you can find it on
> > htt
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 10:09:05AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > If my network stays in this state for the next few days and I can't
> > upload, maybe I can send an interdiff between the last .diff.gz in
> > experimental and the new .diff.gz so that someone could upload for me.
> > Volunteers?
>
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 04:07:37PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080608 15:46]:
> > On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 10:09:05AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > If my network stays in this state for the next few days and I can't
> >
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 10:36:40PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Ok. Unfortunatly xulrunner seems to FTBFS on all arches due to missing
> javaxpcom.jar (some difference between -B and -b I assume), see
> http://bugs.debian.org/485284
Sorry :-/
> If we need another upload anyways, can we do an lib
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 10:26:33AM +0200, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080609 07:41]:
> > BTW, once I upload 1.9~rc2-2, can you trigger binNMUs on bfilter, freej,
> > edbrowse, gxine, libjavascript-perl, and mediatomb ?
&
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 12:53:29PM -0400, Claudio Saavedra wrote:
> Package: libexpat1-dev
> Version: 2.0.1-3
> Severity: important
>
> While trying to build gtk+, libtool failed with this message:
>
> creating libgtk-x11-2.0.la
> /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libexpat.la: No suc
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:57:32AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> We still very regularly get installation reports where people use lilo
> rather than grub, so it must still have a fairly significant user base. I
> would say that the activity on the bug report shows the same.
OTOH, aren't most of the
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 01:28:36PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 18 juin 2008 à 09:52 +0300, Eric Pozharski a écrit :
> > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:19:03AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > OTOH, aren't most of these choosing lilo over grub only
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 02:09:06PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:29:17AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Neither, it's the RC policy which carries more weight than a RG:
> > http://release.debian.org/lenny/rc_policy.txt
> >
> > 5a) Packages in the archive must not be so bugg
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 04:29:17PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:21:59AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On 06/18/08 10:11, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > > Note iceweasel 3.0, which is planned for Lenny, while it contains
> > > embedded copy of
Hi,
Here is an update on mozilla stuff (at least the ones I know) for Lenny.
Current versions of iceweasel and xulrunner in unstable are better than
the ones in testing right now, but are still not release quality. There
are still at least 2 really problematic bugs with it, and a bunch of
other i
Hi,
I just uploaded version 0.9.87.4-1. This is a new upstream release, but
the changes are really limited:
- Version change in all places where the version is displayed
- Version adjustments for applications where it is allowed to be used
(which allows it to run in all 3.0.x versions of icew
Hi,
I just uploaded libxslt 1.1.24-2, which fixes CVE-2008-2935.
Please unblock it.
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I just uploaded nss 3.12.0-5, which solves some minor issues:
- Better upgrade path for people having libnss3-0d installed from old
testing (while libnss3-0d from etch is just fine)
- Tighter build dependencies for libsqlite3-dev.
Please unblock it.
Thanks
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Hi,
I just uploaded diggler 0.9-16 and ctxextensions 4.1.2008062001-1.
The only change to diggler is to allow it to be used on iceweasel 3.0.x.
ctxextensions also has this change, plus a minor fix in keyboard
shortcuts handling.
Please unblock them.
Thanks
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 09:03:15AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just uploaded version 0.9.87.4-1. This is a new upstream release, but
> the changes are really limited:
> - Version change in all places where the version is displayed
> - Version adjustments for applic
Hi,
mozilla-dom-inspector is a new package, that provides
iceweasel-dom-inspector that used to be shipped by iceweasel in version
2.0 and earlier, but is not in version 3.0.
Please allow it in Lenny.
Cheers,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
101 - 200 of 381 matches
Mail list logo
