Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
>> [ can we upload OCaml 3.11 to unstable? ]
>
> I can see that pcre3 is blocking a lot of packages in unstable from
> migrating to testing (including OCaml-related ones). I think we should
> at least wait for this transition to complete.
>
>
Rudi Cilibrasi wrote:
> Dear Debian Release managers,
>
> A couple weeks ago I tried to upload a version -3 of my package libsvm
> and it was blocked because there was already a version -2 in the NEW
> queue. (-2 was put in the new queue because it had one new binary
> package, the java one) I t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
Hi
Please provide an installability check on the packages in
(oldstable-)proposed-updates. Preferably this would be usable on the
(o-)p-u-new queue (directly on a source package, maybe additionaly using a
Packages file).
Cheers
Luk
--
To UN
Martin Godisch wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 17:55:31 -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
>
>> Package: sleuthkit
>> Version: 2.06-3
>>
>> The fedora people discovered that sleuthkit had a license compatibility
>> issue
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401101
>>
>> according to that bu
Christoph Haas wrote:
> Fellow earthicans,
>
> I have just updated the libweather-com-perl package [0] because since
> beginning of May it has stopped working due to a protocol change of the
> used internet service. The fix is a one-line patch between 0.5.3-1.1 and
> 0.5.3-2. It addresses this
Hi
Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 10:41:16PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>>> However, there is no equivilant source of information for packages
>>> apt-installed by d-i.
>> Could there be one? Well, if you're interested in having the same
>> safeguard mechanism in place for these p
Marcus Better wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please unblock this package which fixes an RC bug (#494408). This version
> provides a patch for kernel 2.6.26.
>
> Unfortunately there have been two uploads to sid that didn't transition to
> testing, and there are some minor non-RC changes cluttering the previous
Thibaut VARÈNE wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It just came to my attention that the pidgin-otr package completely
> failed to
> ship translation files along with the software. The fix is trivial (see
> interdiff
> below), I just uploaded to unstable a new package which solves this issue.
>
> I believe it's alr
Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Hi Release Team!
>
> Unfortunately a bug which breaks pyusb on 64bit arches and Python 2.5 only,
> was
> not noticed until now. So I'd like to upload a patched version to
> stable-proposed-updates. Hope that's ok :)
> I've attached a debdiff between -4 and -5 (which was upl
Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
>>>>>> "Luk" == Luk Claes writes:
>
> Luk> I'm afraid so. The possible memory leak fix can maybe be
> Luk> coordinated with the security team?
>
> What about uploading to stable-proposed-updates as the
David Paleino wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:23:10 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
>> On Di, 17 Feb 2009, David Paleino wrote:
>>> fine. Everything _lower_ than any version in squeeze/sid (to ease upgrades)
>>> but _higher_ than the current version in lenny.
>> But in sid = lenny atm, and we will p
Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just fixed a crasher in mt-daapd in 0.9~r1696.dfsg-7
> (#515545). It is possible to crash the server by reloading the web
> pages too fast.
>
> The crash is not exploitable, so it's not a security issue. It seems
> that it's harder to trigger if the browser has
David Paleino wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:02:48 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> bug #420195, "gthumb: Drag and Drop from Folders Pane Causes Copying Loop",
>> was reported more than a year ago. Unfortunately, I had a look at it only
>> very
>> recently, on Feb, 12. I underestimated
Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please unblock fai for stable-proposed-updates, it fixes an important bug
> which prevents perl scripts from working at all, plus two minor also easy to
> fix ones.
>
> The upload has been approved by the regular fai maintainer, Thomas and has
> been preapproved
Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi,
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 06:31:45PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>>
>>>* [76a9163] check if daemon is running befor starting it (Closes:
>>> #516430)
>> Any chance of fixing this in lenny r1?
> I'd be happy
David wrote:
> Hello,
>
> libdvdread3 is missing from sid, but several packages still depend on
> it, between them (but not only) k3b, vlc and related.
This is known and binNMUs will be scheduled soon.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
David wrote:
> Hello,
>
> libraw1394-8 went away from sid. But, if I try to remove it, apt wants
> to remove virtually the whole KDE, totem, and other things.
Yes, this is known. It's because there is a transition from libraw1394-8
to libraw1394-11 which needs all reverse dependencies to be rebui
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Aníbal Monsalve Salazar writes:
>
>> please approve / unblock libpng/1.2.35-1
>
>> Closes: 486415 516256
>> Changes:
>> libpng (1.2.35-1) unstable; urgency=high
>> .
>>* New upstream release
>> - http://secunia.com/advisories/33970/
>>Fix a vulnerabil
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Aníbal Monsalve Salazar writes:
>
>> please approve / unblock xfsprogs/2.10.2-2 (udeb)
>
>> Closes: 514072
>> Changes:
>> xfsprogs (2.10.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
>> .
>>* Remove --enable-lib64=yes in Makefile (closes: #514072)
>
> Ack.
unblocked
cheers
Luk
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Aníbal Monsalve Salazar writes:
>
>> please approve / unblock pciutils/1:3.0.3-2 (udeb)
>
>> Changes:
>> pciutils (1:3.0.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
>> .
>>* Upload to unstable
>>* Put back Matthew Wilcox in uploaders
>>* Update pci.ids with snapshot dated
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 23 février 2009 à 12:21 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
>> a few buildd issues are preventing gtk+2.0 from migrating to testing:
>> * glib2.0 was built successfully on alpha but not uploaded.
>> * gnutls was built on alpha but not uploaded, and has b
David Paleino wrote:
> Hello Luk,
>
> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 16:03:22 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>
>> David Paleino wrote:
>> [..]
>>
>> I guess you should use a version number higher than the one currently in
>> stable, but please do upload and add an en
Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Samstag, 21. Februar 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Christoph Haas wrote:
>>> I have just updated the libweather-com-perl package [0] because since
>>> beginning of May it has stopped working due to a protocol change of
>>> the used int
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Josselin Mouette writes:
>
>> Hi,
>
>> glib2.0 and gtk+2.0 should be ready to migrate to squeeze today. Since
>> they contain udebs, they need manual handling. Could you please unblock
>> them?
>
> Ack; since major issues has been solve I belive we're ok to go with it
>
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Luk Claes writes:
>
>> Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>> Josselin Mouette writes:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> glib2.0 and gtk+2.0 should be ready to migrate to squeeze today. Since
>>>> they contain udebs, they need m
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Paul Wise writes:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 2:33 AM, martin f krafft wrote:
>
>>> please unblock mdadm 2.6.8-12-gb47dff6-2
>>>
>>> PS: why are udeb-providers blocked right after a stable release?
>> They are always blocked (before, after and during the freeze) so that
David Paleino wrote:
> Hello,
> would you please give back gthumb on amd64, hppa and ia64? The build failed
> for
> (seems) temporary reasons.
given back
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Hello dear stable release managers,
Hi Christian
> We, samba maintainers, would like to propose two fixes for samba in
> lenny (that would be package version 2:3.2.4-4lenny1:
>
> * Fix account locking with an LDAP backend. Closes: #514151
> * Correct du recursion i
Michael Schutte wrote:
> Hi -release,
>
> Please let kbd 1.15-1 (which builds kbd-udeb) migrate to testing.
Cc-ing d-i list to see if it's ok to unblock it now.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Luk Claes writes:
>
>> Michael Schutte wrote:
>>> Hi -release,
>>>
>>> Please let kbd 1.15-1 (which builds kbd-udeb) migrate to testing.
>> Cc-ing d-i list to see if it's ok to unblock it now.
>
> [...]
>
&
Neil Williams wrote:
> emdebian-tools appears to still be frozen - could it be unblocked
> please so that 1.5.0 can migrate into testing?
unblocked
cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Please allow eject into testing. It is blocked because
> of its udeb.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> please unblock reiserfsprogs 1:3.6.21-1.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hi,
>
> gnupg/1.4.9-4 has been in unstable for 20 days without newly reported
> problems, but is blocked because it has udebs. Can it please be unblocked?
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
Deng Xiyue wrote:
> Hi Release Managers:
>
> Due to unmet dependency, libgnomeuimm2.6 FTBFS on armel, hppa and sparc,
> which should be satisfied by now. Hppa is already building, so only
> give-back on armel and sparc is needed:
>
> gb libgnomeuimm2.6_2.24.0-2 . armel sparc
>
> Also, there's a
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 11 March 2009 at 10:03, Lo c Minier wrote:
> | Hi Dirk,
> |
> | I see you're concerned with the way we handle SONAME transitions.
> | Please bring this up directly to the release team (Cc:-ed).
>
> My bug report against ftp.debian.org was immediately close:
Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
>
>> The buildd is running etch, and etch's dpkg punts on Breaks.
>
> That's what I thought. Looks like mipsel is the only architecture
> lagging behind in this regard?
One of the mips buildds and one of the mipsel buildds, so if it would
get picked
Olly Betts wrote:
> Hello,
>
> xapian-bindings 1.0.10-1 was uploaded 19 days ago. It's ready to
> migrate apart from a missing mips build. The buildd logs show it
> built successfully on mips on feb 21st, but it seems this build
> never got uploaded.
>
> I mailed m...@buildd.d.o on Monday, but
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> please accept my stable sbnc update. It fixes the awaited location of
> the key file for SSL support (from /usr/sbin/sbnc.key to
> /etc/sbnc/sbnc.key). The last path is also mentioned in the docs, seems
> like I lost a patch in the past..
>
> It fixes this bug:
Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> I thought I had sent this out a couple of days ago but apparently not
> but in case you are seeing this twice, sorry. Oh and please Cc me on
> replies.
>
>> Bug #470890 reported that the CGI::Application::Plugin::ActionDispatch
>> perl module in libcgi-application-plugins-
Norbert Preining wrote:
> Dear Luk,
Hi Norbert
> On So, 22 Feb 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Indeed, uploading a version to sid and one with a lower version to
>> proposed-updates.
>
> Ok, we have in sid 2007.dfsg.17-1 and I have prepare 2007.dfsg.17-1~lenny01
> I hope t
Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, 28 Feb 2009, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
>> The (tiny) patch that fixes this is enclosed. Please let me know if
>> it is OK to upload 0.5.1-2 with this patch to "stable".
>
> Following discussions with vorlon on #debian-devel I am uploading
> this
Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> However, I think the toolame package in stable may stay both for the
> convenience of our users and because it's not *that* bad after all. I
> have prepared a package targeted at Lenny that fixes two portability
> bugs and some minor lintian warnings. It can be found at
Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please unblock munin 1.2.6-10~lenny1 for stable-proposed-updates, it fixes an
> important yet trivial bug with cgi graphing (#514634) and fixes a trivial
> regex in the netstat plugin (#507069)).
Ok, should get included in the next point release.
Cheers
Luk
--
Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> * Gunnar Wolf [2009-03-13 23:47]:
> [...]
>>> This is Debian bug #449544.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately the vulnerability described above is not important enough
>>> to get it fixed via regular security update in Debian oldstable. It does
>>> not warrant a DSA.
>>>
>>> However i
Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> please unblock reiser4progs 1.0.7-2.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 05:22:22PM +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>> https://buildd.debian.org/~luk/status/package.php?p=gparted
>>
>> gparted 0.3.9-3 listed as built at the page above.
>>
>> Could someone get it to change its status from built to installed?
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 04:39:52PM +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 06:47:11PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>>> Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>>> Aníbal Monsalve Salazar writes:
>>>>
>>>>&
LaMont Jones wrote:
> bind9 1:9.5.1.dfsg.P1-2 was just uploaded to stable, and should
> hopefully go into lenny r1 (-3 was then uploaded to sid... go me and
> version numbers...)
>
> All of the bugs fixed are properly either serious (atomic operations
> broken in bad ways, resulting in an unusabl
Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> Please unblock lvm2/2.02.44-3.
>
> This may need to following easy hint:
> | easy lvm2/2.02.44-3 -devmapper/2:1.02.27-4
hints added
cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> ltsp is blocked from migrating into testing, due to the ltsp-client-builder
> udeb, though this udeb is not used by debian-installer by default, and worked
> fine in my last tests.
>
> it has been in unstable for 11 days without introducing new problems,
> fixes several
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> Hi release team,
Hi Javier
> I would like to make an upload to stable to fix bug 503992 of Snort. Basicly,
> this bug was introduced with the patch for a security vulnerability but
> introduced a sigsegv due to an improper call to a function. This error kil
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Dear Stable Release Managers,
>
> After a first upload which you approved and entered s-p-u, we (Samba
> package maintainers) would like to upload a second update for packages
> in lenny.
>
> This update's changelog is:
>
> samba (2:3.2.5-4lenny2) stable-proposed-updat
Hi
The upcoming point releases for both Etch and Lenny are planned for
April 4th.
Please have a look at the respective websites [0] [1] [2] for a more or
less up-to-date status of the preparations.
Security updates that are complete could still make it till after March
28th, though this has to b
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Neil Williams wrote:
> Could emdebian-tools be unblocked please so that 1.6.0 can migrate into
> testing in a few days time?
unblocked
> (Is there a different way to do this - iirc it is only because of the
> udeb which is not incorporated into d-i directly at this time - it's
> only used when d-
Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> one of the packages blocking the evolution transition (modest) is
>> completely broken since the upload of GTK+ 2.14, and not likely to be
>> fixed soon, according to the bug log.
>
> Sorry, which bug?
>
>> Therefore, could so
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> The latest debian/control for mpi-defaults [1], version 0.4, has:
>
> Source: mpi-defaults
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0),
> libopenmpi-dev (>= 1.2.4-5) [i386 amd64 ia64 powerpc kfreebsd-i386
> kfreebsd-amd64],
> openmpi-bin [i386 amd64 ia64 powerpc kfreebsd-i38
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Riku Voipio [2009-03-24 10:01]:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:48:06AM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
>>> The latest debian/control for mpi-defaults [1], version 0.4, has:
>>> This means that the dep-waits I see in [2] for alpha (libopenmpi-dev (>=
>>> 1.3)) and s
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Josselin Mouette writes:
>
>> Le dimanche 22 mars 2009 à 20:26 +0100, Luk Claes a écrit :
>>> Please have a look at the respective websites [0] [1] [2] for a more or
>>> less up-to-date status of the preparations.
>> The installer team
Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> avrdude has failed to build because of broken build-deps which should be fixed
> by now.
>
> gb avrdude_5.6-1 . sparc
given back
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adeodato Simó (13/03/2009):
>> * Julien BLACHE [Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:47:01 +0100]:
>>> Let's hope that will happen. Does it need to get rescheduled once
>>> again?
>> Yes, it’s rescheduled now. We’ll see what happens.
>
> Worked fine. Please could you also give back blende
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> I think you need this:
>
> gb rhythmbox_0.11.6-1.1 . sparc
>
> The autobuild failed [1] against ucf 3.0017 due to a bug that is fixed in
> the next version of the package:
forced give-back.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debia
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> freetype 2.3.9-4 is ready to go into testing, but it includes a udeb.
> debian-boot, is this ok to update?
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis
gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 12:22:37 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>
>>>>> This is Debian bug #449544.
> [..]
>>>>> However it would be nice if this could get fixed via a regular point
>>>>> update[1].
>>>>
gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 19:22:18 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
>
>>> I'm attaching the diff between 1.30-2 (in oldstable) and 1.38-2 (the
>>> last version in the archive that got removed later). The diff is
>>> created by
>> Please note that there was also a 'second half' to CVE-200
unblocked
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you unblock dmraid/1.0.0.rc15-6 please?
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Neil Williams wrote:
> The udeb that was in the emdebian-tools source package <= 1.6.0 is now
> in the emdebian-archive-keyring source package >= 1.8.0 in unstable.
> Presumably, the same reasoning that led to emdebian-tools <= 1.6.0
> being frozen with regard to migration into testing should actua
Hi
Can you please upload a fix for this bug to stable, TIA?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Hi,
>
> According to grep-excuses, pciutils 1:3.1.2-3 is ready to migrate to
> testing but is currently blocked.
>
> Please unblock it, so packages in testing bitten by #522114 can
> finally be unbroken.
grep-excuses is a bit out-of-date, it was unblocked earlier today.
C
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can openssl 0.9.8g-16 be hinted to testing?
>
> It fixes a security issue.
>
> It has a udeb.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> ltsp is blocked from migrating into testing, due to the ltsp-client-builder
> udeb, though this udeb is not used by debian-installer by default, and has no
> changes since the previous version.
>
> it has been in unstable for 6 days without introducing new problems, and
Hi
This is just to inform you that there will be soon a point release of
Etch: 4.0r8 tomorrow and Lenny: 5.0.1 on Saturday.
In a point release packages in oldstable or stable will get updated.
Most of these packages will already be in the security archive, though
some of them are fixes for major
Davide Viti wrote:
> Hi,
> please allow current ttf-dejavu (2.29-2) into testing.
> It contains a couple of udebs.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Mark Brown wrote:
> Please consider zlib for migration to testing, it has been in unstable
> for quite some time and contains only one very small change:
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Please accept beep to transition to testing. It is mostly only a
> translation and cosmetic update, no code changes involved. For your
> convenience, here's the changelog:
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.deb
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> 2009/4/15 Josselin Mouette :
>> Hi,
>>
>> atk1.0 (which has an udeb) is blocked and cannot enter testing at the
>> moment. Would it be possible to unblock it?
>>
>> BTW, I don’t know whether this is possible, but it would be nice if the
>> rules for udeb migration could be
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> At the moment we have problems when we do releases including new
> CD/DVD images, as you'll see from mailing list complaints about broken
> links each time. Simon Paillard and I had some discussion about this
> today on #debian-www and I've come up with a work
Michael Banck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I accidently uploaded avogadro_0.9.3-1 to stable first, please
> disregard.
Rejected by Phil.
> PS: I hope that was the correct contact
It's the correct contact address atm.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 07:14:52PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> At the moment we have problems when we do releases including new
>>> CD/DVD images, as you'll see from mailing list
Barry deFreese wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please remove AND freeze the following source packages from testing:
>
> gnome-libs 1.4.2-37
Already gone by now.
> libnet0 1.0.2a-7
Removal from testing scheduled.
> imlib 1.9.15-7
Waiting for kdegraphics to be migrated to testing, before scheduling for
re
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm sorry that it took us so much time to make a working yum package,
> but we were quite overloaded with our work, taking over all the
> customers of another web hosting company (taking all our time doing
> support). Anyway, I could today take the time to upload a
Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi,
Bug #509930 makes nss crash on sparc (as reported on our BTS) and ia64
(as reported upstream). It has the bad side effect to make iceweasel and
anything using nss OCSP check. I'm currently uploading a fix to unstable,
but I think it would be a good thing to have this fix i
Jan-Pascal van Best wrote:
Dear release team,
I'd like to propose an update to the solr package in Lenny to fix
bug#522992. It's an installability bug, which causes
# apt-get install solr-tomcat5.5
to fail for a new installation of solr-tomcat5.5 if tomcat5.5 isn't
installed before.
Please find
Simon Horman wrote:
Hi,
I would like to upload a(nother) fresh version of heartbeat to fix
a but in the o2cf resource. Without the simple fix suggested
by Michel, the script is completely broken - though I should
not that the script was first deprecated and more recently
removed from upstream.
David Henningsson wrote:
Hello Release team,
while working on adopting my first package (fluidsynth), non-DFSG files
were discovered in all releases of fluidsynth, both unstable, testing,
stable and oldstable. (bug: #524566)
The non-DFSG files is a soundfont and some documentation, and is only
Bart Martens wrote:
Hello debian-release team,
debian-volatile team,
debian-security team,
I have updated bug report 457291 "flashplugin-nonfree: decision
2007-12-21: keep this package out of stable starting with lenny".
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=457291
I here
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
gringotts is now uninstallable, since gdk-pixbuf has been removed from
unstable as part of the GTK 1.2 removal.
Please remove it from testing. There's an RC bug in place, which prevents
migration until ported to recent GTK.
Removal hint added.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNS
Christian Perrier wrote:
Hello guys,
Hi Christian
Bug #522907 seems to affect users who use Winbind along with an
OpenLDAP server. These users are experiencing frequent winbind crashes
that seem to de due to a behaviour of OpenLDAP that hadn't been
anticipated by Samba developers.
Upstrea
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
Would it be OK to upload this to s-p-u?
>>> Yes, please upload.
>>
>> I have another one..:-)
>>
>> In #520794, a memory leak was reported when users use the full_audit
>> VFS module along with Samba.
>>
>> It was corre
Peter Van Eynde wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Evgeny noticed that bug #517205 was also present in the stable package:
> xref.lisp was by mistake included in the upstream tarball.
>
> Luca proposed:
>> I would just repackage upstream as 20080223:
>> =
>> l...@gismo:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 1:20080
Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi,
> multipath-tools 0.4.8-15 is blocked in unstable probably because of it's
> udeb. However it fixes CVE-2009-0115 (accidentaly uploaded with
> urgency=low). Could you unblock it please?
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.de
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please let gtk+ 2.16 go into testing. It is blocking, among other
> things, the gnome-desktop transition.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li
Neil Williams wrote:
> The source packages are now split and the final versions are now in
> Debian unstable.
>
> emdebian-archive-keyring is not expected to need an update again before
> Squeeze, so could 2.0.0 be unblocked please?
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-rel
Hi,
There appeared to be some porting progress right after the release, but
that seems to have stalled. The port is having trouble keeping up with
building and has some major flaws.
HPPA is clearly the worst at keeping up among the release
architectures[0], especially considering that mipsel has
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> + Moritz Muehlenhoff (Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:17:05 +0200):
>
>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:52:13AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>>> + Moritz Muehlenhoff (Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:05:38 +0200):
>
Or maybe I'm misunderstanding you and uninstallable packages are removed
autom
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 03:40:35PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for asterisk some time ago.
CVE-2009-0041[0]:
| IAX2 in Asterisk Open Source 1.2.x before 1.2.31, 1.4.x before
| 1.4.23-rc4, and 1.6.x bef
Jonny Lamb wrote:
Empathy 2.26.1-1 didn't build on hppa and mipsel due to unsatisfiable
Build-Deps at the time, but are now present. It failed on mips for
another reason[0]. I suspect this latter problem might just be a
problem with all the transitions recently, but I could be wrong.
Please:
gb
401 - 500 of 2457 matches
Mail list logo
