David Paleino wrote: > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:23:10 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote: >> On Di, 17 Feb 2009, David Paleino wrote: >>> fine. Everything _lower_ than any version in squeeze/sid (to ease upgrades) >>> but _higher_ than the current version in lenny. >> But in sid = lenny atm, and we will probably only do lenny stuff on the >> 2007 packages anyway ... > > You should do separate uploads nevertheless, if I correctly understood the > proposed-updates mechanism.
Indeed, uploading a version to sid and one with a lower version to proposed-updates. > And this also applies if you want to make the same changes in sid and in lenny > -- you should do two uploads (<version>-1+lenny1 and <version>-2) > >> It was more about the distribution line, whether it should be "unstable" >> or "proposed-updated" or something else. > > If it's meant to be uploaded in lenny, stable-proposed-updates (or just > "proposed-updates") is the way to go. And if you want to make the same changes > in sid, you should upload a -2 there, separately. :) > > Then again, I might be wrong, and RMs will tell us. > I hope I got everything right though, someone (*cough*NM*cough*) might be > watching me. ;) You're right, we just need a version in unstable before we can accept the one in proposed-updates. Cheers Luk PS: Please mention your package and bug number when you upload to proposed-updates on [1]. [1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases/PointReleases/5.0.1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
