status of s390 for jessie and later

Hi, the architecture status page for Wheezy[1] mentioned that it would be the last release if s390x comes in. As Wheezy was release with the s390x support, should we now look at removing s390 from both jessie and sid? Ansgar [1]

Bug#707548: nmu: php5-midgard2_10.05.7-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, please schedule a binNMU for php5-midgard2. It still depends on libmidgard2 which is no longer built by midgard2-core. nmu php5-midgard2_10.05.7-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmidgard

Bug#700205: pu: libquvi-scripts/0.4.15-1~deb7u1

Control: retitle -1 pu: libquvi-scripts/0.4.15-1~deb7u1 "Adam D. Barratt" writes: > On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 10:01 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> On 03/19/2013 20:10, Julien Cristau wrote: >> > Not sure there's still time for this. Might need to defer to 7.0.1 &

Bug#707953: nmu: slurm-drmaa_1.0.6-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please schedule a binNMU for slurm-drmaa. It's the last package depending on libslurm23 which changed soname to libslurm24. nmu slurm-drmaa_1.0.6-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libslurm24."

Temporary solution for changelog problem in binNMUs

Hi, with wheezy released and development on jessie started the problem with binNMUs for multiarch-enabled packages is back: binNMU'ed packages have different changelog entries and upgrades fail (for example [1]). [1] It's quite annoying as the problem is only de

Bug#708208: nmu: minetest_0.4.6+repack-6

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please schedule a binNMU for minetest on armel and mips. It's the last package depending on libirrlicht1.7a (changed soname to libirrlicht1.8). nmu minetest_0.4.6+repack-6 . armel mips . -m

Bug#708218: dh_installchangelogs: split binNMU entries into extra file

Package: debhelper Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org [ CC'ed -release as they handle binNMUs and should be the most interested party in having a fix. ] binNMUs for multiarch packages are currently broken as the changelog will differ between architectures. There are sever

Bug#708247: pu: package smcroute/0.95-2

Hi, On 05/14/2013 15:16, Micha Lenk wrote: > * Switch to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format for easier patch maintenance. I'm not on the release team, but from experience the release team doesn't want such changes in stable. Please apply the patch directly. > Is the distribution 'stable' correct f

Re: Wheezy point release planning

On 05/12/2013 20:56, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Based on some informal queries a little while ago, the weekend of 15/16 > June looks like a good date for the first wheezy point release. Would > that work for everyone? I can do the ftpmaster side. Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release

Bug#708425: nmu: drizzle_1:7.1.36-stable-1 gearman-interface_0.13.2-2.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please schedule binNMUs for drizzle, gearman-interface. They still depend on libgearman6 (now: libgearman7). nmu drizzle_1:7.1.36-stable-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libgearman7." nmu gearm

Bug#709018: nmu: entangle_0.5.1-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please schedule a binNMU for entangle to rebuild it against libgexiv2-2: nmu entangle_0.5.1-1 . amd64 i386 powerpc s390x . -m "Rebuild against libgexiv2-2." It is the last package still de

Bug#709021: nmu: sp-gxmlcpp_1.0.20040603-5, syncevolution_1.2.99.1-1.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please schedule binNMUs for sp-gxmlcpp and syncevolution. They are the last two packages depending on libcppunit-1.12-1. nmu sp-gxmlcpp_1.0.20040603-5 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libcppunit-

Bug#709026: nmu: connman_1.0-1.2, xtables-addons_1.47.1-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please scheuld binNMUs for connman, xtables-addons. They are the last two packages depending on libxtables9. nmu connman_1.0-1.2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libxtables10." nmu xtables-addons

Bug#709028: nmu: linphone_3.5.2-10

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please schedule a binNMU for linphone. It's one of the last two packages still depending on libexosip2-7. (The other is sipwitch which currently fails to build, #707450.) nmu linphone_3.5.2-

Bug#709028: libosip2 and libexosip2 transitions (was: nmu: linphone_3.5.2-10)

Hi, it looks like there's another (uncoordinated) transition for libosip2 in addition to the one for libexosip2 going one. So a few more binNMUs might be needed. I don't feel like looking into this. The maintainers of the packages should probably do something and read [1] in any case. [1]

Bug#709030: nmu: caret_5.6.4~dfsg.1-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please schedule a binNMU for caret. It's one of the two packages still depending on libminc2-1. (The other is insighttoolkit4 which currently FTBFS, #686399.) nmu caret_5.6.4~dfsg.1-3 . ALL

Bug#709035: nmu: qemu_1.1.2+dfsg-6a

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please schedule a binNMU for qemu. It's one of the last two packages still depending on libusbredirparser0. (The other is spice-gtk which build-depends on a valac-0.18 which was only in exper

Bug#709037: nmu: xen-api_1.3.2-15

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please schedule a binNMU for xen-api. It's one of the last two packages still depending on old xen libraries. (The other is qemu for which I already requested a binNMU for another transition,

Bug#709813: transition: enet

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition I would like to upgrade enet in unstable to 1.3.7 which means a soname change. The new package is already uploaded to experimental and waiting for buildds to become available. Rebuilding

Bug#710084: nmu: irssi_0.8.15-5~bpo60+1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask for binNMUs in backports, but let's see ;) Please schedule a binNMU for irssi in squeeze-backports on i386. It looks like it wasn't built in a

iceweasel 17 for wheezy in NEW

Hi, the security update for iceweasel targeted at wheezy ended up in NEW. What would you like us to do with it? We could add the overrides, reject it from NEW and move the package back to unchecked. Then it would end in p-u-NEW and you can handle it as you see fit. (Note to self: uploads for som

Re: iceweasel 17 for wheezy in NEW

"Adam D. Barratt" writes: > On 2013-06-03 9:46, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> the security update for iceweasel targeted at wheezy ended up in NEW. >> What would you like us to do with it? >> >> We could add the overrides, reject it from NEW and move the pac

Bug#700205: pu: libquvi-scripts/0.4.15-1~deb7u1

On 05/22/2013 08:46, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Cyril Brulebois writes: >> Ansgar Burchardt (09/05/2013): >>> Today upstream released 0.4.15 which includes fixes for various sites: > [...] >>> I uploaded it to unstable. Looking at wheezy can probably wait un

Bug#700205: pu: libquvi-scripts/0.4.15-1~deb7u1

"Adam D. Barratt" writes: > On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 09:39 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> Just a quick reminder as winter^W the p-u-NEW freeze is coming. It would >> be nice if this could be included in the upcoming point release. > > Please go ahead, thanks;

Re: Question about update excuses

Hi, On 06/13/2013 10:49, Santiago Vila wrote: > The web page "update excuses" today says this about base-files: > >Generated: 2013.06.12 22:06:17 + > * base-files_pu (7.2 to 7.1wheezy1) > + Maintainer: Santiago Vila > + ALERT: base-files is newer in testing (7.2 7

Bug#709813: transition: enet

Julien Cristau writes: > On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 19:57:16 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> I would like to upgrade enet in unstable to 1.3.7 which means a soname >> change. The new package is already uploaded to experimental and waiting >> for buildds to become available.

Bug#709813: transition: enet

On 06/15/2013 00:23, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 08:51:18 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> Uploaded yesterday evening and already built for all archs (although >> the kfreebsd-i386 build is still pending upload for some reason). >> > Scheduled bin

Bug#714065: nmu: bbpager_0.4.7-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu libbt was a transitional package for libbt0 and dropped in the most recent upload of blackbox. However bbpager still depends on it. Please schedule a binNMU to make it pick up the new packag

Bug#714068: nmu: netexpect_0.20-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please schedule a binNMU for netexpect to make it pick up the new wireshark libraries. nmu netexpect_0.20-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libwireshark3, libwsutil3, libwiretap3." Ansgar --

Bug#714069: nmu: njplot_2.4-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please schedule a binNMU for njplot to make it pick up libvibrant6 instead of libvibrant6a. nmu njplot_2.4-2 . armel armhf mips s390 s390x sparc . -m "Rebuild against libvibrant6." Ansgar

Bug#714070: nmu: ncbi-tools6_6.1.20120620-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu It looks like ncbi-tools6 was built in an unclean environment: libvibrant6/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libpng15-15 (>= 1.5.2-1) Please schedule a binNMU to get rid of that dependency. nm

Bug#714073: nmu: slurm-drmaa_1.0.6-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please schedule a binNMU to build slurm-drmaa against libslurm25. nmu slurm-drmaa_1.0.6-2 . ALL . -m "Build against libslurm25." Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...

Bug#714069: nmu: njplot_2.4-2

On 06/25/2013 17:21, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 13:58:51 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> Please schedule a binNMU for njplot to make it pick up libvibrant6 instead of >> libvibrant6a. >> >> nmu njplot_2.4-2 . armel armhf mips s390 s390x

Bug#719961: pu: package gxine/0.5.907-2+deb7u1

eb7u1) wheezy; urgency=low + + * d/control: Switch to libmozjs185-dev as the package fails to build with +newer versions of libmozjs-dev. (Reference: #66) + + -- Ansgar Burchardt Sat, 17 Aug 2013 10:00:48 +0200 + gxine (0.5.907-2) unstable; urgency=low * Switched source maintenan

Bug#719966: pu: package openvrml/0.18.9-5+deb7u1

/changelog +++ openvrml-0.18.9/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +openvrml (0.18.9-5+deb7u1) wheezy; urgency=low + + * Disable JavaScript support as newer versions of Mozilla's JS engine are +not supported by openvrml. (Closes: #710616) + + -- Ansgar Burchardt Sat, 17 Aug 2013 10:23:05

Bug#712615: transition: perl 5.18

On 08/20/2013 21:11, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 22:04:30 +0200, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: >> Other ideas which were discussed here at Debconf include temporarily >> removing libsvn-perl, and uploading the version currently in testing >> to unstable again (unlikely to be accepta

Bug#721859: pu: package libquvi-scripts/0.4.18-1~deb7u1

ebian/changelog 2013-09-04 19:35:55.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,29 @@ +libquvi-scripts (0.4.18-1~deb7u1) wheezy; urgency=low + + * Upload to wheezy. + + -- Ansgar Burchardt Wed, 04 Sep 2013 19:35:47 +0200 + +libquvi-scripts (0.4.18-1) unstable; urgency=low + + * New upstream release. + + -- A

Bug#722150: nmu: libsigrokdecode_0.2.0-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please schedule a binNMU for libsigrokdecode. The maintainer upload was pending in NEW for a while and still depends on python3.2. nmu libsigrokdecode_0.2.0-2 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild against p

Bug#723116: RM (or pu): chmsee -- RoQA; FTBFS with Iceweasel 17

Package: release.debian.org Tags: wheezy User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm X-Debbugs-Cc: chm...@packages.debian.org chmsee fails to build with Iceweasel 17 in stable[1]. This was fixed in unstable by a new upstream release (2.0.1). An even newer upstream release (2.0.2) in

Bug#723114: RM (or pu): edbrowse -- RoQA; FTBFS with Iceweasel 17

Package: release.debian.org Tags: wheezy User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm X-Debbugs-Cc: edbro...@packages.debian.org edbrowse fails to build with Iceweasel 17 in stable[1]. In unstable the package was changed to use libmozjs185-dev instead which isn't really suitable for a

Bug#723110: RM (or pu): pyxpcom -- RoQA; FTBFS with Iceweasel 17

Package: release.debian.org Tags: wheezy User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm X-Debbugs-Cc: pyxp...@packages.debian.org pyxpcom fails to build with Iceweasel 17 in stable and is also broken in unstable[1]. There is some activity upstream[2] and it looks like it might support i

Bug#721859: pu: package libquvi-scripts/0.4.18-1~deb7u1

Ansgar Burchardt writes: > I would like to update libquvi-scripts in wheezy again. Not surprisingly > it needed changes for various sites, see NEWS in the attached diff. Note > that I've clean the diff a bit and removed autotools and version change > noise. libquvi-scripts/0.4.

Bug#724234: pu (nmu): package user-mode-linux/3.2-2um-1+deb7u2+b1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu user-mode-linux should be rebuilt against the latest linux upload for the point release. A binNMU should be enough. nmu -d wheezy user-mode-linux_3.2-2um-1+deb7u2 . amd64 i386 -m "Rebuild agains

Bug#721859: pu: package libquvi-scripts/0.4.18-1~deb7u1

Cyril Brulebois writes: > Ansgar Burchardt (2013-09-16): >> Ansgar Burchardt writes: >> > I would like to update libquvi-scripts in wheezy again. Not >> > surprisingly it needed changes for various sites, see NEWS in the >> > attached diff. Note that I

Bug#719961: pu: package gxine/0.5.907-2+deb7u1

Cyril Brulebois writes: > Ansgar Burchardt (2013-08-17): >> I've prepared an update for gxine that switches to libmozjs185-dev from >> libmozjs-dev as gxine fails to build with newer versions of the latter >> package. >> >> The same change was already done

Bug#719966: pu: package openvrml/0.18.9-5+deb7u1

Cyril Brulebois writes: > Ansgar Burchardt (2013-08-17): >> I prepared an update for openvrml that disable JavaScript support as >> the package fails to build with newer versions of libmozjs-dev. As it >> might be used to view downloaded files, I think it should not use >

Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

On 10/02/2013 09:45, Niels Thykier wrote: > Summary table: > Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total > ---++-++-++---++-- [...] > sparc[2] || 1 || 0 || 0 ||1 > > [2] By the looks of it, if sparc was replaced by sparc64, we could be >

Bug#725405: pu: package libquvi-scripts/0.4.19-1~deb7u1

deletions(-) + + v0.4.18 (2013-09-03) / Toni Gundogdu Tobias Gruetzmacher: diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 4f3814b..db10436 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,18 @@ +libquvi-scripts (0.4.19-1~deb7u1) wheezy; urgency=low + + * Upload to wheezy

Bug#719966: pu: package openvrml/0.18.9-5+deb7u1

"Adam D. Barratt" writes: > On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 16:42 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> It looks like we'll be accepting the newer iceweasel packages from >> security for 7.2, so under the circumstances I'd be prepared to accept >> the direct fix so long as the remaining functionality of the pa

Bug#725405: pu: package libquvi-scripts/0.4.19-1~deb7u1

Cyril Brulebois writes: > Ansgar Burchardt (2013-10-05): >> A new upstream version of libquvi-scripts was released today and >> uploaded to unstable. It includes fixes for liveleak.com and >> funnyordie.com. >> >> I'm not entirely sure if it is a good ide

Bug#713049: pu: gosa - fix mass import of users in wheezy

"Adam D. Barratt" writes: > On Sun, 2013-10-06 at 00:22 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: >> hm, when running "dak ls debian-edu-artwork" on coccia.d.o I see the today >> uploaded d-e-artwork package in the "accepted" suite, but this aint the case >> for "dak ls gosa" - any idea why? >> >> Same for s

Bug#726817: chrony: GPL-2-only program linking GPL-3+ libreadline6 on amd64

Package: chrony Severity: serious Version: 1.24-3+squeeze1 X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@security.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org The security update for chrony links against libreadline6 on amd64. However chrony is licensed under GPL-2-only and libreadline6 is GPL-3-or-later. The buildd uploads

Bug#727091: opu (binnmu): chrony_1.24-3+squeeze1+b1 -- GPL-2-only program linking GPL-3+ libreadline6 on amd64

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertag: opu On 10/20/2013 18:10, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 04:06:06PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> The security update for chrony links against libreadline6 on >> amd64. Ho

Which key to use for signing oldstable-*?

Hi, Phillip Kern noticed we use the new Wheezy automatic signing key for squeeze-updates, but not for squeeze-security and asked to change the former back to the Squeeze key. I looked at the archive to see what was done in the past and noticed that the Squeeze key was used to sign the last Lenny

Bug#733818: nmu: gdb-avr_7.4-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please schedule a binNMU for gdb-avr. The version currently in the archive is built using gdb-source 7.4really-1 or 7.4.1-3, but the current version is 7.6.1. nmu gdb-avr_7.4-1 . ALL . -m "R

Re: Scheduling 7.4 and 6.0.9

Hi, On 01/08/2014 06:50 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > How are people fixed for: > > 8th / 9th February > 15th / 16th February > 22nd / 23rd February > 1st / 2nd March I'm still free on all dates. Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "uns

Re: Scheduling the 7.5 point release

Hi, On 03/01/2014 21:44, Niels Thykier wrote: > We are slowly starting to prepare for the 7.5 point release and are > suggesting one of the four following weekends: > > * April 12th/13th > * April 19th/20th (Easter) > * April 26th/27th > * May 3rd/4th I don't have any particular plans on eit

Re: Scheduling the 7.5 point release

On 04/21/2014 19:35, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 23:03 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> On Sat, 2014-03-15 at 09:01 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >>> On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 21:44 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: We are slowly starting to prepare for the 7.5 point release and are >

Bug#746241: transition: enet

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, enet had a soname change (just accepted into experimental) and needs a transition. The ABI changes should be unproblematic (just new members in a public struct). There also are only

Bug#746241: transition: enet

Hi, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes: > On 28/04/14 14:46, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> enet had a soname change (just accepted into experimental) and needs a >> transition. The ABI changes should be unproblematic (just new members >> in a public struct). There also are only a

Re: 7.6 and 6.0.10

Hi, "Adam D. Barratt" writes: > (Somewhat belatedly) it's time to organise the next point releases for > Wheezy and Squeeze (7.6 and 6.0.10). [...] > Giving ourselves the usual pre-window to get organised, some suggested > dates would be: > > - June 28/29 > - July 5/6 > - July 12/13 > - July 19/2

<    1   2   3