On 10/02/2013 09:45, Niels Thykier wrote: > Summary table: > Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total > ---------------++-----++---------++-------++------ [...] > sparc[2] || 1 || 0 || 0 || 1 > > [2] By the looks of it, if sparc was replaced by sparc64, we could be > looking at 3 in the "Other"-column rather than 0.
In addition gcc no longer supports 32bit sparc according to the architecture qualification notes for Squeeze[1] and Wheezy[2]. [1] <http://release.debian.org/squeeze/arch_qualify.html#sparc-upstream> [2] <http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html#sparc-upstream> So it might make sense to drop sparc in any case and add sparc64 if there are enough people interested. Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/524be06e.2000...@debian.org
