On 13/03/2025 15:24, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Hi,
sorry but a few more packages have new transitions, so I'd rather do a
bigger one in a few days than the modest one I proposed in this report.
Keep in mind that the transition deadline is in two days.
Cheers,
Emilio
On 06/03/2025 17:21, Timo Röhling wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: libg...@packages.debian.org, ruby-rug...@packages.debian.org,
python-pyg...@packages.debian.org, ca...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:libgit2
User: release.debian@packages.debia
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1100166 [release.debian.org] transition: onnxruntime
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1100166: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100166
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On 13/03/2025 16:37, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote:
* Gabriel F. T. Gomes:
This is probably due to the fact that libiso9660 is built from the same
source as libcdio; thus, when libiso9660 is built, it is linked against
the version of libcdio installed on the build system, which is version
2.1.0-5.
* Gabriel F. T. Gomes:
>
> This is probably due to the fact that libiso9660 is built from the same
> source as libcdio; thus, when libiso9660 is built, it is linked against
> the version of libcdio installed on the build system, which is version
> 2.1.0-5.
This is wrong. libcdio itself doesn't hav
Your message dated Thu, 13 Mar 2025 15:19:47 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Change of mind: don't transition!
has caused the Debian Bug report #1100177,
regarding transition: coq-elpi 2.5.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Thu, 13 Mar 2025 17:31:38 +0100
with message-id <47a24497-66ab-4463-b19a-2ef6dbde5...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1099557: transition: poppler 25.03
has caused the Debian Bug report #1099557,
regarding transition: poppler 25.03
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Thu, 13 Mar 2025 17:30:44 +0100
with message-id <1df3706e-29c2-4caa-89c1-c7ada7d12...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1098901: transition: Qt 6.8.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1098901,
regarding transition: Qt 6.8.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On 13/03/2025 17:21, Julien Puydt wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: jpu...@debian.org
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers
A new upstream version of coq-elpi, coq-quickchick, coq-simple-io and
co
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 12/03/2025 08:24, Shengqi Chen wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: affects -1 = src:onnxruntime
Dear release managers,
Upstream has just released onnxruntime 1.21.0, leadin
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 01:27:37PM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 05:48:09PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
It sounds like tree-sitter should get a SOVERSION bump. Can you
discuss that with upstream?
Yes, I already had plans to do that with them.
They're already awar
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025, at 5:59 PM, Timo Röhling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [2025-03-13 16:18]:
>>How are the API breaks in this release? Did you rebuild the rdeps
>>against the new version? I'm all for updating libgit2, but only if it
>>doesn't break half the rdeps.
> There are thr
On 2025-03-09 17:28:26 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 2025-03-09 14:41:21 +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: addresses-for-gnus...@packages.debian.org
> > Control: affects -1 + src:addresses-for-g
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 11/03/2025 16:55, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
László Böszörményi (GCS) (2025-03-11):
Almost two weeks have passed. Friendly ping, do you ACK or NACK this
fuse3 transition kibi?
Sorry for the delay and thanks for the reminder…
Glancing at the packages in unstable and
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1099045 [release.debian.org] transition: fuse3
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1099045: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1099045
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1100426 RM: kanboard -- RoST; unmaintained; security issues
Bug #1100426 [release.debian.org] RM: kanboard/1.2.26+ds-2+deb12u2
Changed Bug title to 'RM: kanboard -- RoST; unmaintained; security issues' from
'RM: kanboard/1.2.26+ds-2+deb12
Your message dated Thu, 13 Mar 2025 21:13:18 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1100424: RM: python-mapnik/1:0.0~20240222-5ab32f020-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1100424,
regarding RM: python-mapnik/1:0.0~20240222-5ab32f020-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Thu, 13 Mar 2025 17:42:23 +0100
with message-id <389b0597-e236-474d-ad64-69f06dfe2...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1098925: transition: glibc 2.41
has caused the Debian Bug report #1098925,
regarding transition: glibc 2.41
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 16:47:08 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
This is wrong. libcdio itself doesn't have to be installed during the
build of libiso9660. The dependency is taken from the symbols file, and
I did not update debian/libcdio.symbols to be 2.2.0.
This would fix the dependency confu
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 08/03/2025 21:50, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Control: affects -1 + src:icu
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi RMs,
I dragged on for a long time, but it's a simple transition. The A
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1099852 [release.debian.org] transition: icu
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1099852: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1099852
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On 13/03/2025 02:59, James McCoy wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: em...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:emacs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu emacs_1:30.1+1-4 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against tree-sitter 0.22"
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: python-map...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:python-mapnik
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Please remove python-mapnik (and its nik4 rdep) from testing.
This only needs to happen from s390x, where
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:python-mapnik
Bug #1100424 [release.debian.org] RM: python-mapnik/1:0.0~20240222-5ab32f020-3
Added indication that 1100424 affects src:python-mapnik
--
1100424: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100424
Debian Bug Tracking System
Co
Hi,
* Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [2025-03-13 16:18]:
How are the API breaks in this release? Did you rebuild the rdeps
against the new version? I'm all for updating libgit2, but only if it
doesn't break half the rdeps.
There are three API breaks:
1. the git_email_create_from_diff() function has
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: jpu...@debian.org
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers
A new upstream version of coq-elpi, coq-quickchick, coq-simple-io and
coqeal are out ; they require rebuilding all
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
X-Debbugs-Cc: k...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:krb5
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
[ Reason ]
* CVE-2025-24528
[ Impact ]
* low security bug is no-dsa but should be fixed
[ Tests ]
* automati
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:krb5
Bug #1100421 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package krb5/1.20.1-2+deb12u3
Added indication that 1100421 affects src:krb5
--
1100421: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100421
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.deb
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 05:48:09PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 13/03/2025 02:59, James McCoy wrote:
nmu emacs_1:30.1+1-4 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against tree-sitter 0.22"
I think I overlooked an ABI incompatibility when uploading tree-sitter
0.22, which is causing emacs to cr
Hi,
Le jeu. 13 mars 2025, 17:29, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a
écrit :
> On 13/03/2025 17:21, Julien Puydt wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: jpu...@debian.org
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:kanboard
Bug #1100426 [release.debian.org] RM: kanboard/1.2.26+ds-2+deb12u2
Added indication that 1100426 affects src:kanboard
--
1100426: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100426
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debia
Your message dated Thu, 13 Mar 2025 16:21:15 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1100163: nmu: jeolib-miallib_1.1.6-1+b1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1100163,
regarding nmu: jeolib-miallib_1.1.6-1+b1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello,
I want to request binNMU on riscv64 to update its binary dependency on
libboost-python1.83.0-py312 with libboost-python1.83.0-py313:
nmu coot_1.1.09+dfsg-4 . riscv64 . unstable
Your message dated Thu, 13 Mar 2025 10:12:54 -0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1100385: nmu: coot_1.1.09+dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1100385,
regarding nmu: coot_1.1.09+dfsg-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Hi,
[including Chris in CC]
On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 09:05:43AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On 29-08-2024 17:05, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > I've already spent some time looking at this, and in fact there are
> > *already* changes in our version of django-storages that are clearly
> >
* Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
>
> I assume at this point that means bumping the shlibs to get proper
> dependencies.
That was my initial idea, too, but I have given additional thought to
this and I think that this is not the right thing to do. Just to make
sure we are all discussing the same thing, th
Hi,
On 14-03-2025 04:53, Guillem Jover wrote:
The block seems like the most important information there, because
even if everything else gets solved that still requires active action
by the release-team. So I think it would be better to place it as the
first item, also so that it does not get dr
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 release.debian.org
Bug #1067490 [tracker.debian.org] tracker.debian.org: Display release-team
blocks more prominently
Bug reassigned from package 'tracker.debian.org' to 'release.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1067490 to th
38 matches
Mail list logo
