Bug#1099081: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, gworkspace

2025-02-27 Thread Yavor Doganov
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-gnustep-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: affects -1 + src:gnustep-base src:gnustep-gui src:gworkspace We at the GNUstep team would like to request a transiti

please hint cccl into testing

2025-02-27 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Hi, please hint src:cccl into testing, at the same time src:cub, src:libcudacxx and src:libthrust need to be removed. src:cccl is a new source package that has taken over the binary packages from these three packages. Thanks Andreas

Bug#1099065: bookworm-pu: package openh264/2.3.1+dfsg-3+deb12u2

2025-02-27 Thread Bastian Germann
Package: release.debian.org Tags: bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Dear release team, [ Reason ] libopenh264-cisco7 cannot be installed properly with my latest security upload. [ Impact ] #1099030 documents that the postinst downloads from a 404 HTTP URL. [ T

Uploading linux (6.12.17-1)

2025-02-27 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi I would like to upload linux version 6.12.17-1 to unstable. it imports 6.12.17 and fixing as well one already allocated CVE (CVE-2025-21746). The main urgency for uploading another revision is though fixing a regression we introduced by a missing dependency on pahole for the kbuild package cau

Processed: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, gworkspace

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:gnustep-base src:gnustep-gui src:gworkspace Bug #1099081 [release.debian.org] transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, gworkspace Added indication that 1099081 affects src:gnustep-base, src:gnustep-gui, and src:gworkspace -- 1099081: https://bugs.d

Bug#1099074: bookworm-pu: package jinja2/3.1.2-1+deb12u2

2025-02-27 Thread Lee Garrett
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm X-Debbugs-Cc: jin...@packages.debian.org, deb...@rocketjump.eu Control: affects -1 + src:jinja2 User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu [ Reason ] Fix CVE-2024-56201 Fix CVE-2024-56326 [ Impact ] Two security vulnerab

Processed: bookworm-pu: package jinja2/3.1.2-1+deb12u2

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:jinja2 Bug #1099074 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package jinja2/3.1.2-1+deb12u2 Added indication that 1099074 affects src:jinja2 -- 1099074: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1099074 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bug

Bug#1099074: bookworm-pu: package jinja2/3.1.2-1+deb12u2

2025-02-27 Thread Lee Garrett
On 27/02/2025 23:06, Lee Garrett wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm X-Debbugs-Cc: jin...@packages.debian.org, deb...@rocketjump.eu Control: affects -1 + src:jinja2 User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu [ Reason ] Fix CVE-2024-56201 Fix CVE-202

Bug#1094440: transition: xnnpack and onednn for PyTorch 2.6

2025-02-27 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 02/02/2025 00:01, Shengqi Chen wrote: Control: retitle -1 transition: xnnpack, onednn, pytorch{,-cuda} Hi, 2025年1月28日 08:33,Shengqi Chen 写道: They have exact same reverse dependencies (pytorch and onnxruntime) that are also maintained by the deep learning team: * pytorch needs a new upstr

Processed: transition: fuse3

2025-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:fuse3 Bug #1099045 [release.debian.org] transition: fuse3 Added indication that 1099045 affects src:fuse3 -- 1099045: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1099045 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1099045: transition: fuse3

2025-02-27 Thread GCS
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: affects -1 + src:fuse3 X-Debbugs-CC: k...@debian.org Hi RMs, There were some ABI breaks in the latest versions of fuse3 and thus those were not packaged. Upstream to solve these

Re: Bug#1098948: Changing 10.1 requirements for /usr/games

2025-02-27 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2025-02-26 15:55:06 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Of course this does not consider conflicts, so in practice we have > some false positives. Here is an example output. [...] As the policy is written, a Conflicts does not seem to be a resolution for programs with the same filenames: 10.1 Tw