Your message dated Tue, 4 May 2021 09:30:59 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#987924: unblock: exim4/4.94-19
has caused the Debian Bug report #987924,
regarding unblock: exim4/4.94-19
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Tue, 04 May 2021 09:16:58 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock htop
has caused the Debian Bug report #988011,
regarding unblock: htop/3.0.5-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Tue, 04 May 2021 09:19:32 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock phonon
has caused the Debian Bug report #988030,
regarding unblock: phonon/4.11.1-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 04 May 2021 09:20:59 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock etbemon
has caused the Debian Bug report #987982,
regarding unblock: etbemon/1.3.5-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 04 May 2021 09:22:39 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock ifenslave
has caused the Debian Bug report #988006,
regarding unblock: ifenslave/2.12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 04 May 2021 09:26:57 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock python2.7
has caused the Debian Bug report #987835,
regarding unblock: python2.7/2.7.18-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 04 May 2021 09:38:30 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock pypy
has caused the Debian Bug report #987957,
regarding unblock: pypy/7.3.3+dfsg-2 pypy3/7.3.3+dfsg-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Tue, 04 May 2021 09:44:49 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock glusterfs
has caused the Debian Bug report #987988,
regarding unblock: glusterfs/9.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package broadcom-sta
[ the reason for the unblock ]
It fixes a serious bug #987159
that txpower cannot get/set correctly, with some other fixes.
The patches are in experiment
Processing changes file: shim_15.4-3~deb10u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: msdem...@ari.uni-heidelberg.de
Severity: normal
Please unblock package gavodachs
[ Reason ]
The version 2.3+dfsg-3 lowers the severity of #984555 so that it is not
longer release critical. S
This was automatically closed by ftpmaster because the package was
removed from unstable, but this still does not fix the FTBFS problem
in stable.
Unfortunately I don't think a proper fix will be forthcoming, upstream
has abandoned the crate in question.
Afaict the only purpose this package ser
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:48:09AM +0100, peter green wrote:
> > This was automatically closed by ftpmaster because the package was
> > removed from unstable, but this still does not fix the FTBFS problem
> > in stable.
>
> Unfortunately I don't think a proper fix will be forthcoming, upstream
> h
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package python-xstatic-angular
[ A bit of background about xstatic packages ]
XStatic packages are a way to embedd artifacts in a Python module. In
Debian, they are patched t
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Control: retitle -1 unblock: spip/3.2.11-2
Hi Ivo,
Le 13/04/2021 à 10:52, Ivo De Decker a écrit :
I'm leaning towards accepting it. I suggest you upload it to unstable, and
we'll leave it there for a while.
Uploaded three weeks ago.
If issues show up (either in u
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo
Bug #985958 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock: spip/3.2.11-2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> retitle -1 unblock: spip/3.2.11-2
Bug #985958 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock: spip/3.2.11-2
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: spip/3.2.11-2'
Processing changes file: shim_15.4-3~deb10u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: shim_15.4-3~deb10u1_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: shim_15.4-3~deb10u1_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-4
Bug #987766 [release.debian.org] unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-3
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-4' from 'unblock:
open-iscsi/2.1.3-3'.
--
987766: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987766
Debian Bu
Control: retitle -1 unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-4
Hello Paul,
On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 22:00 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 30-04-2021 17:03, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > I will go ahead with the upload now and will untag this bug report
> > of
> > `moreinfo`.
>
> That's not what I meant. I'
Hi,
Justin B Rye wrote (Sat, 1 May 2021 11:54:06 +0100):
> Holger Wansing wrote:
> > I would suggest this change:
> >
> >
> > By subscribing to the Debian announcement mailing list, you will receive
> > a
>
> I don't much like this, though I'm not sure it matters: pedantically,
> you don't
Your message dated Tue, 04 May 2021 19:16:02 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock broadcom-sta
has caused the Debian Bug report #988048,
regarding unblock: broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271-16
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Tue, 4 May 2021 21:14:13 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#988014: nmu: postfix_3.5.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #988014,
regarding nmu: postfix_3.5.6-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org
Dear release team
This is a pre-approval request to please unblock package libxml2 (not
yet uploaded to unstable, but to experimental so far as
2.9.10+dfsg-6
Your message dated Tue, 04 May 2021 20:07:44 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock mksh
has caused the Debian Bug report #987975,
regarding unblock: mksh/59c-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Tue, 04 May 2021 20:06:21 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock refpolicy
has caused the Debian Bug report #987983,
regarding unblock: refpolicy/2.20210203-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Bug #987947 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): gtk+3.0/3.24.24-4
Added tag(s) moreinfo and confirmed.
--
987947: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987947
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
On 2021-05-02 14:13:56 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org, debian-b...@lists.debian.org
>
> I'd like
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: ed-deb...@s5h.net
Please unblock package rust-pleaser
[ Reason ]
Unblock is needed to migrate rust-pleaser 0.4.1 to testing. The SUSE
Security Team (primarily Matthias Gerstne
Hi,
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 09:19:20PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org
>
> Dear release team
>
> This is a pre-approval request to please unblo
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mina2
(Please provide enough (but not too much) information to help
the release team to judge the request efficiently. E.g. by
filling in the sections below.)
[ Reas
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package micro-evtd
[ Reason ]
One-line patch to fix FTBFS (#987631). Also taking the opportunity to
update the Maintainer field; I hope that's OK.
[ Impact ]
The packag
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ruby-rugged
Version 1.1.0+ds-3 in testing was trying to access internet during tests
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987650
As indicated in the bug
33 matches
Mail list logo
