Bas Couwenberg wrote:
On 2020-02-10 09:58, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
Could someone have a look at why pyfribidi and fribidi are not
transitioning to unstable (I'm not sure how the regression tests are
impacting the transitions)? This apparently blocks pango1.0.
The autopkgtest for
package release.debian.org
tags 948786 = buster pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: apt-cacher-ng
Version: 3.2.1-1
E
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 948786 = buster pending
Bug #948786 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: pac
Processing changes file: apt-cacher-ng_3.2.1-1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: apt-cacher-ng_3.2.1-1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: apt-cacher-ng_3.2.1-1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: apt-cacher-ng_3.2.1-1_s390x.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: apt-cacher-ng_3.2.1-1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: apt-cacher-ng_3.2.1-1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: apt-cacher-ng_3.2.1-1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: apt-cacher-ng_3.2.1-1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes f
Processing changes file: apt-cacher-ng_3.2.1-1_mips64el.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: apt-cacher-ng_3.2.1-1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hello release team,
a nasty bug made it into the Debian 10 ("buster") version of softflowd,
and I'd like to fix that in a stable point release.
Due to a broken flow aggregation, th
Your message dated Sun, 16 Feb 2020 06:50:22 +0100
with message-id <4de0f915-2906-74ee-d79c-4e96c4946...@xs4all.nl>
and subject line transition: netcdf
has caused the Debian Bug report #949267,
regarding transition: netcdf
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Sun, 16 Feb 2020 06:49:15 +0100
with message-id
and subject line transition: netcdf-fortran
has caused the Debian Bug report #949135,
regarding transition: netcdf-fortran
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
11 matches
Mail list logo