Your message dated Sun, 16 Feb 2020 06:49:15 +0100
with message-id <b12acc59-a769-8e91-0583-15fad07aa...@xs4all.nl>
and subject line transition: netcdf-fortran
has caused the Debian Bug report #949135,
regarding transition: netcdf-fortran
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
949135: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=949135
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-netcdf-fortran.html
Control: block -1 by 949132 949134
netcdf-fortran bumped its SONAME requiring a transition.
Most rdeps built successfully, two FTBFS due to unrelated issues as summarized
below.
Transition: netcdf-fortran
libnetcdff6 (4.4.5-1+b1) -> libnetcdff7 (4.5.2+ds-1~exp1)
The status of the most recent rebuilds is as follows.
cdftools (3.0.2-3) FTBFS (#949132)
etsf-io (1.0.4-4) OK
ferret-vis (7.5.0-2) OK
ncl (6.6.2-1) SKIP
oasis3 (3.mct+dfsg.121022-13) FTBFS (#949134)
pyferret (7.5.0-2) OK
Kind Regards,
Bas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
oasis3 & cdftools got fixed, and the latter finally migrated to testing
completing this transition.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
--- End Message ---
