Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
I'd like to upload a fix for bug#723707 to stable.
The minimalistic patch is attached.
Thanks for considering.
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer
Control: tag -1 wheezy
Alessio Treglia (2013-10-09):
> I'd like to upload a fix for bug#723707 to stable.
> The minimalistic patch is attached.
That would be too late for 7.2 (p-u-NEW froze past weekend).
> --- smplayer-0.8.0/debian/changelog 2012-04-14 06:08:32.0 +0100
> +++ smplayer
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 wheezy
Bug #725864 [release.debian.org] pu: package smplayer/0.8.0-1
Added tag(s) wheezy.
--
725864: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725864
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Cyril,
thanks for the quick response.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> That would be too late for 7.2 (p-u-NEW froze past weekend).
I'm sorry for the delay, I'll wait until the next point release then.
> Please use 0.8.0-1+deb7u1 instead.
Sure, committed to git, th
Hi all,
It was nice to see updates happening on this transition but some
packages are still to go through (it seems).
I did the updates and only one of the obsolete packages have some
dependencies which have not been updated to newer versions of library.
$ alias apto
alias apto='aptitude search ~
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 22:14:42 +0200
Cristian Greco wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Oct 2013 23:59:44 +0200
> Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > it doesn't appear you coordinated the libtorrent-rasterbar{6,7}
> > transition with the release team, but I've set up a tracker anyway:
> > http://release.de
On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 04:46 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 19:47:16 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Is there a plan for fixing #717983 in unstable in the near future? As
> > things currently stand, 1.16.11 would have to be pushed in to testing as
> > part of the point release
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #723793 [release.debian.org] pu: Non-free file in PyOpenCL
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #723793 to the same tags previously set
--
723793: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=723793
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 18:10 +0200, Tomasz Rybak wrote:
> Dnia 2013-10-02, śro o godzinie 01:12 +0200, Cyril Brulebois pisze:
> > Cyril Brulebois (2013-09-23):
> > > The squeeze.diff one seems to have unrelated noise in patches,
> > > presumably because something refre
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 19:35 +0200, Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
> The version of sympa in oldstable is affected by a bug which permit to
> one user to crash or trigger an endless loop in the fastcgi process
> running the sympa web interface (wwsympa). See #654622
>
> DSA
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #725291 [release.debian.org] ospu: package sympa/6.0.1+dfsg-4+squeeze2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
725291: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725291
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Adam D. Barratt:
>> There is a 9.0-10+deb70.4 upload in Secre^WSecurity Team's queue since
>> 23 days ago but I've no idea the status if this. [rt.debian.org #4671]
>
> In that case, the status of that package needs clarifying. Releasing .5
> via p-u if .4 is then going to appear via security doe
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #725304 [release.debian.org] pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.5
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
725304: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725304
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSU
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 20:58 +, Robert Millan wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt:
> >> There is a 9.0-10+deb70.4 upload in Secre^WSecurity Team's queue since
> >> 23 days ago but I've no idea the status if this. [rt.debian.org #4671]
> >
> > In that case, the status of that
Hello,
2013/10/7 Riku Voipio :
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:07:25PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
>> +++ Niels Thykier [2013-10-02 09:45 +0200]:
>> > armel: Wookey (DD), Gatis Visnevskis (!DD), Nobuhiro Iwamatsu (DD), Steve
>> > McIntyre (DD)
>> > armhf: Jeremiah Foster (!DD, but NM?), Wookey (DD), Justus
Adam D. Barratt:
>>> In that case, the status of that package needs clarifying. Releasing .5
>>> via p-u if .4 is then going to appear via security doesn't really work.
>>
>> .4 just went into proposed-updates.
>
> No. It's in wheezy-security, but it's _not_ in proposed-updates because
> it reache
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 22:12 +, Robert Millan wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt:
> >>> In that case, the status of that package needs clarifying. Releasing .5
> >>> via p-u if .4 is then going to appear via security doesn't really work.
> >>
> >> .4 just went into proposed-updates.
> >
> > No. It's in w
17 matches
Mail list logo
