On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 04:46 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 19:47:16 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Is there a plan for fixing #717983 in unstable in the near future? As > > things currently stand, 1.16.11 would have to be pushed in to testing as > > part of the point release. > > Yes, sorry about that, I didn't want to push an upload yet due to some > problems with the commit mailing list, and because when manpages-it got > fixed the problem became pretty much non-urgent. But on a second thought > it might be blocking packages depending on 1.17.0 features, so I could > have for example lowered the severity (even if temporarily). > > In any case I was planning on releaseing 1.17.2 in a couple of days > anyway, so that should turn this into a non-issue.
unstable still appears to have 1.17.1, so it looks like we may well be pushing 1.6.12 in to testing on Saturday. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1381345913.29291.25.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
