Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: debian-edu
Here is a request to approve an upload of gosa to wheezy, to fix a bug
Debian Edu need to have fixed in our Debian Edu Wheezy
Hi,
automake1.11 is currently Provided by the automake binary package in the
automake1.11 source package.
However, that binary package is superseded by the automake binary
package built by the automake1.13 source package.
As a result, the following 37 packages fail to build:
aumix
conky
cstream
d
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
For some reasons, the detection whether specific flags were needed to
compile with pthread support didn't return the correct value resulting
in a generated .pc file missing some flags.
On 2013/6/2 D. Barbier wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hello,
>
> openturns 1.1 has been uploaded into experimental, and introduces a
> soname bump. Version 1.1-3 uploaded few days ago should build fin
[please consider replacing debian-ports@ldo with the appropriate port
specific list when replying.]
Comrades!
At our recent Essen sprint, DSA went through the release qualification
matrix (for wheezy, as there isn't one for jessie, yet) and defined a
set of requirements that we consider necessary
Processing control commands:
> tags 712622 + confirmed - moreinfo
Bug #712622 [release.debian.org] pu: package wv2/0.4.2.dfsg.1-9.1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #712622 to the same tags previously set
Bug #712622 [release.debian.org] pu: package wv2/0.4.2.dfsg.1-9.1
Ignoring request to al
Control: tags 712622 + confirmed - moreinfo
Control: tags 712623 + confirmed - moreinfo
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 02:36 +0100, Olly Betts wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 07:26:39PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > What version were you proposing to use for the re-repack?
>
> I'm open to guidance as
Processing control commands:
> tags 712622 + confirmed - moreinfo
Bug #712622 [release.debian.org] pu: package wv2/0.4.2.dfsg.1-9.1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
Bug #712622 [release.debian.org] pu: package wv2/0.4.2.dfsg.1-9.1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> tags 712623 + confirmed - moreinfo
Bug #712623 [r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk).
> # stable updates are not unblocks...
> usertags 713049 = pu
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: pu.
> t
* Martin Zobel-Helas (zo...@debian.org) [130622 19:27]:
> [please consider replacing debian-ports@ldo with the appropriate port
> specific list when replying.]
According to lists.d.o the status of debian-ports is: dead list. It at
least isn't the list for all porters to read.
> * mips: existing
* Martin Zobel-Helas (zo...@debian.org) wrote:
> [please consider replacing debian-ports@ldo with the appropriate port
> specific list when replying.]
>
> * armel: no remote management (being worked on); no archive kernel for
> the machines we use.
>
> * armhf: no remote management (being work
Martin Zobel-Helas writes:
> [please consider replacing debian-ports@ldo with the appropriate port
> specific list when replying.]
>
> Comrades!
>
> At our recent Essen sprint, DSA went through the release qualification
> matrix (for wheezy, as there isn't one for jessie, yet) and defined a
> set
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 09:21:29PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
> Martin Zobel-Helas writes:
>
> > * armel: no remote management (being worked on); no archive kernel for
> > the machines we use.
>
>
> afair buildd are:
> marvell DB-78x00 -> should be supported by armel kernel flavour mx78xx0
>
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 09:21:29PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
>> Martin Zobel-Helas writes:
>>
>> > * armel: no remote management (being worked on); no archive kernel for
>> > the machines we use.
>>
>>
>> afair buildd are:
>> marvell DB-78x00 -> should be supported b
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 09:45:17PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 09:21:29PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
> >> Martin Zobel-Helas writes:
> >>
> >> > * armel: no remote management (being worked on); no archive kernel for
> >> > the machines we u
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 713263 libgd-gd2-noxpm-perl
Bug #713263 [src:libgd-gd2-noxpm-perl] libgd-gd2-noxpm-perl: FTBFS: tests failed
Bug reassigned from package 'src:libgd-gd2-noxpm-perl' to
'libgd-gd2-noxpm-perl'.
No longer marked as found in versions libgd-gd
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 02:51:43PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> GCC 4.8 is now the default on all x86 architectures, and on all ARM
> architectures (the latter confirmed by the Debian ARM porters).
GCC 4.8 seems fine on s390x, it can build a running Linux kernel. On
s390 something weird happened
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 713660 libgtkglext1-dev 1.2.0-3
Bug #713660 [src:g3dviewer] g3dviewer: FTBFS: gcc: error: unrecognized command
line option '-V'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:g3dviewer' to 'libgtkglext1-dev'.
No longer marked as found in versions g3dv
18 matches
Mail list logo
