On 2013/6/2 D. Barbier wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hello, > > openturns 1.1 has been uploaded into experimental, and introduces a > soname bump. Version 1.1-3 uploaded few days ago should build fine > everywhere if buildds have enough RAM, all issues found in earlier > versions should now be fixed. > Thus I would like to upload this version into unstable. > > No packages depend directly on libopenturns0.1, but eficas > build-depends on python-openturns (which itself depends on > libopenturns0.1/0.2) and feel++ build-depends on libopenturns-dev. It > is not clear to me whether these dependencies are really necessary, > but this is another story. > > Please tell me whether uploading openturns 1.1-3 into unstable is fine by you.
Hello, Here is an update: * openturns 1.0-4 just received an RC bug (#713524), which is already fixed in experimental. * openturns 1.1-3 has still not been built on armel, mips and mipsel, and build failed on sparc with a cryptic message (The bug is not reproducible, so it is likely a hardware or OS problem) * Upstream is preparing a new release; I would really like to move 1.1 into sid so that I can upload 1.2 into experimental. Please tell me whether I can upload opennturns 1.1 into sid. Thanks, Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAMqf4EG8fm++V+Sx9jinBVWqtVizU_VJUer=hkvv4zrevhq...@mail.gmail.com
