Hi,
the security update for iceweasel targeted at wheezy ended up in NEW.
What would you like us to do with it?
We could add the overrides, reject it from NEW and move the package back
to unchecked. Then it would end in p-u-NEW and you can handle it as you
see fit.
(Note to self: uploads for som
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 669729 710870
Bug #669729 [gnome-user-share] gnome-user-share: transition towards Apache 2.4
Bug #710870 [gnome-user-share] gnome-user-share: When i want to install , i
got gnome-user-share : Depends: apache2.2-bin but it is not going
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi folks,
apparently, adding jessie support to debootstrap for 7.1 almost got
forgotten… (thanks, #-buildd folks). Here's a source debdiff for it.
The script is a large addition, but on the git
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
(please explain the reason for this update here)
Hi stable release managers,
I'm here proposing a stable update for gnome-settings-daemon to fix
#629351[1]. The bug causes this package to segfa
On 03/06/13 12:13, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Please review and comment. Also put Debian GNOME packaging team in CC so
> once acked they can help preparing the upload.
Please commit this change to the unstable branch on svn too. It needs to be
uploaded to unstable before it can be accepted for wheezy, ot
Hi,
looking at http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi?release=wheezy&rc=1 I wonder if it
would be appropriate to tag all these GDFL-issues and "postinst uses
/usr/share/doc" bugs with wheezy-ignore, assuming they probably will not be
fixed in wheezy and if they had existed a month ago they would have b
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 03/06/13 12:13, Xiyue Deng wrote:
>> Please review and comment. Also put Debian GNOME packaging team in CC so
>> once acked they can help preparing the upload.
>
> Please commit this change to the unstable branch on svn too. It nee
On 03/06/13 13:47, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>> On 03/06/13 12:13, Xiyue Deng wrote:
>>> Please review and comment. Also put Debian GNOME packaging team in CC so
>>> once acked they can help preparing the upload.
>>
>> Please commit this c
Processing changes file: libreoffice_3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2_armel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ujuag-0008kx...@franck.debian.org
On 2013-06-03 9:46, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
the security update for iceweasel targeted at wheezy ended up in NEW.
What would you like us to do with it?
We could add the overrides, reject it from NEW and move the package
back
to unchecked. Then it would end in p-u-NEW and you can handle it as
y
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 710893 + wheezy
Bug #710893 [release.debian.org] pu: package debootstrap/1.0.48+deb7u1
Added tag(s) wheezy.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
710893: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 12:05 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> apparently, adding jessie support to debootstrap for 7.1 almost got
> forgotten… (thanks, #-buildd folks). Here's a source debdiff for it.
> The script is a large addition, but on the git side of it, that's
> just a symlink to the sid one,
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 15:44 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 12:05 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > apparently, adding jessie support to debootstrap for 7.1 almost got
> > forgotten… (thanks, #-buildd folks). Here's a source debdiff for it.
> > Th
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #710893 [release.debian.org] pu: package debootstrap/1.0.48+deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
710893: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710893
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSU
Adam D. Barratt (03/06/2013):
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 12:05 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > apparently, adding jessie support to debootstrap for 7.1 almost got
> > forgotten… (thanks, #-buildd folks). Here's a source debdiff for it.
> > The script is a large addition, but on the git side of it,
Control: tags -1 + wheezy confirmed
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 03:13 -0700, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> I'm here proposing a stable update for gnome-settings-daemon to fix
> #629351[1]. The bug causes this package to segfault on mipsel, and even
> causes gdm3 to display "Oh no! Something has gone wrong" screen
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + wheezy confirmed
Bug #710894 [release.debian.org] pu: package
gnome-settings-daemon/3.4.2+git20121218.7c1322-3
Added tag(s) wheezy and confirmed.
--
710894: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710894
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@
Control: tags -1 + wheezy confirmed
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 00:51 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> sl-modem-source has an upgrade issue from squeeze: the maintainer
> scripts in squeeze may fail, but the new (transitional) package does not
> have maintainer scripts any more to be used as fallback. S
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + wheezy confirmed
Bug #710736 [release.debian.org] pu: package sl-modem/2.9.11~20110321-8+deb7u1
Added tag(s) wheezy and confirmed.
--
710736: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710736
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> On 2013-06-03 9:46, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> the security update for iceweasel targeted at wheezy ended up in NEW.
>> What would you like us to do with it?
>>
>> We could add the overrides, reject it from NEW and move the package
>> back
>> to unchecked. Then it would
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On 2013-05-22 01:57, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Andreas Beckmann (27/04/2013):
>> I identified three packages that don't ship a SONAME symlink and cause
>> spurious creation and removal of this link by ldconfig. Spurious since
>> the packages themselves don't call ldconfi
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #706281 [release.debian.org] pu: libusb/0.1.12-20+nmu2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
706281: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706281
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 12:00:40 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> I recently switched Vibrant from Lesstif to Motif per the latter's move
> to main, and reuploaded its sole reverse dependency, njplot, accordingly
> (per #710205). However, njplot accidentally hit several autobuilders
> ahead of ncbi-
Your message dated Mon, 03 Jun 2013 19:01:41 +0100
with message-id <1370282501.5209.16.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#710816: [release.debian.org] Please BinNMU gnome-boxes
on i386
has caused the Debian Bug report #710816,
regarding [release.debian.org] Please BinNM
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #708521 [release.debian.org] pu: package gcc-4.7/4.7.2-5+deb7u1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
708521: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708521
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCR
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On 2013-05-21 23:32, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Julien Cristau (16/05/2013):
>>> I'd like to get gcc-4.7 updated in wheezy to add an extra Breaks
>>> that will fix some upgrade paths from squeeze (#690172). It's
>>> mainly about giving apt a small push to remove some obs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 706830 with 710937
Bug #706830 [release.debian.org] transition: php5 5.5
706830 was not blocked by any bugs.
706830 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 706830: 710937
Warning: Unknown package 'src:mysql-server-5.5'
> thanks
S
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 20:02:45 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> I'm pretty confident this only has an influence on the upgrades that
> didn't upgrade gcc-4.4-base (and kept the version from squeeze).
> I can help testing upgrade paths in advance if you can describe some
> squeeze package sets yo
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 14:36:59 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Julien Cristau writes:
>
> > Any particular reason this needs to be handled ahead/separately from
> > #708462?
>
> I renamed libvibrant6a back to libvibrant6 (a name last used for the
> Lesstif 1.x build in 2006), so NBS cleanup wou
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 16:34:24 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 19:50:46 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
>
> > Due to net-snmp package upgrade from 5.4.3 to 5.7.2, also from libsnmp15 to
> > libsnmp30. Then, following source packages need to be rebuilt:
> >
> Scheduled binN
Julien Cristau writes:
> Any particular reason this needs to be handled ahead/separately from
> #708462?
I renamed libvibrant6a back to libvibrant6 (a name last used for the
Lesstif 1.x build in 2006), so NBS cleanup would render unrebuilt njplot
binaries uninstallable. Sorry for not mentioning
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 pu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7+deb7u1
Bug #706598 [release.debian.org] tpu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7
Changed Bug title to 'pu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7+deb7u1' from 'tpu:
win32-loader/0.7.4.7'
--
706598: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706598
Debian
Control: retitle -1 pu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7+deb7u1
Hi Julien,
Le jeudi, 2 mai 2013 17.38:03, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit :
> Le jeudi, 2 mai 2013 15.08:05, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> > I think come back for r1.
>
> Fair enough. An upload to unstable would be good to have anyway, no? People
> c
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #710736 [release.debian.org] pu: package sl-modem/2.9.11~20110321-8+deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
710736: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710736
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 17:24 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 00:51 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > sl-modem-source has an upgrade issue from squeeze: the maintainer
> > scripts in squeeze may fail, but the new (transitional) package does not
> > h
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 15:47 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 15:44 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 12:05 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > apparently, adding jessie support to debootstrap for 7.1 almost got
> > > forgotten…
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #710893 [release.debian.org] pu: package debootstrap/1.0.48+deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
710893: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710893
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCR
Julien Cristau writes:
> That sounds bad. Don't reuse library package names for different ABIs!
I know that's bad practice in general, but the name libvibrant6 last
appeared in sarge, which reached EOL five years ago, so I considered it
safe to reuse by now; I recall similar policies for C++ an
Processing changes file: telepathy-gabble_0.16.5-1+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: telepathy-gabble_0.16.5-1+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: telepathy-gabble_0.16.5-1+deb7u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: telepathy-gabble_0.16.5-1+deb7u
Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy1_kfreebsd-i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
Pro
Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 23:01:39 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> We have not started talking to the maintainers of packages depending on
> lesstif2 (other than a message to d-devel [1]), as I wanted to have the
> way clear before that. Graham Inggs has tested building all the reverse
> dependencies [2
42 matches
Mail list logo
