Bug#702193: Bug#617613: freecad in fact does not link to incompatible libraries

I reported a removal bug #702193 [1]. Looking again at coin3-library and trying to get a newer version, I realized, that the latest available version is the same as in Debian, 3.1.3. This version, seems, has been released in 2010, when the license was GPL. The last commit into VCS was in December

Bug#688966: Bug#677795: Bug#688966: Review midgard2-core package

>> Only (and only) if midgard2-core[0] and php5-midgard2[1] are >> distributed together. > > Why? Because php5-midgard2 provides language bindings to midgard2 content repository. Unfortunately there's no php-gir bindings. Testing distribution has midgard2-core 10.05.7 and php5-midgard2 10.05.6. Bo

Bug#702193: Bug#617613: freecad in fact does not link to incompatible libraries

On 05.03.2013 08:06, Anton Gladky wrote: Looking again at coin3-library and trying to get a newer version, I realized, that the latest available version is the same as in Debian, 3.1.3. This version, seems, has been released in 2010, when the license was GPL. The last commit into VCS was in Dece

Bug#702193: Bug#617613: freecad in fact does not link to incompatible libraries

[Added upstream support address to CC] Hi, Coin3D developers - this relates to a license issue in the Debian Linux distribution concerning the linking of Coin3D to code licensed in a GPL-incompatible manner. Later releases of Coin3D were relicensed under a BSD license, but it is unclear wheth

Bug#702206: unblock: graphviz/2.26.3-13

Hi Christoph, On 04/03/13 01:15, Christoph Egger wrote: > +graphviz (2.26.3-13) unstable; urgency=low > [...] > + [ Christoph Egger ] > + * Import patch by Steven Chamberlain to fix hangs on kfeebsd (Closes: > #701832) Thank you for handling that... Please could you try givebacks of freefoam,

Bug#702334: unblock: sssd/1.8.4-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi Please unblock package sssd Timo Aaltonen prepared an updated sssd package (versioned 1.8.4-2) adressing two security fixes (CVE-2013-0219 and CVE-2013-0220). The debdiff is unfortunate

Bug#702306: marked as done (unblock: puredata/0.43.2-5)

Your message dated Tue, 05 Mar 2013 13:14:51 +0100 with message-id <5135e1bb.1000...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#702306: unblock: puredata/0.43.2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #702306, regarding unblock: puredata/0.43.2-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#702308: marked as done (unblock: mediawiki/1:1.19.4-1)

Your message dated Tue, 05 Mar 2013 13:22:52 + with message-id <70548dd8697ab6491e157cdc48d1b...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#702308: unblock: mediawiki/1:1.19.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #702308, regarding unblock: mediawiki/1:1.19.4-1 to be marked as done. Th

Bug#702348: unblock: mksh/40.9.20120630-7

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package mksh unblock mksh/40.9.20120630-7 (Thanks to Lisandro for his posting on Planet Debian!) Dear Release Team, please unblock mksh (40.9.20120630-7) for wheezy. The d

Bug#689822: release.debian.org: please accept the package wims_4.03a-8 into testing-proposed-updates

Hi Georges, Georges Khaznadar wrote (04 Mar 2013 20:58:06 GMT) : > Just a ping, to remind that wims was kicked out of testing after a bug > in a testing-watch test. Can the package wims be accepted into testing > again? There must be a misunderstanding: it looks like you're absolutely not taking

Bug#689822: release.debian.org: please accept the package wims_4.03a-8 into testing-proposed-updates

On 05.03.2013 15:23, intrigeri wrote: Hi Georges, Georges Khaznadar wrote (04 Mar 2013 20:58:06 GMT) : Just a ping, to remind that wims was kicked out of testing after a bug in a testing-watch test. Can the package wims be accepted into testing again? There must be a misunderstanding: it lo

Bug#702353: unblock: python2.7/2.7.3-8

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock python2.7 (2.7.3-8) unstable; urgency=low * python2.7: Replace python2.7-minimal (<< 2.7.3-7). Closes: #702005. * Build the _md5, _sha1, _sha256 and _sha512 extension modules. python2.

Re: openjdk maintenance for wheezy and squeeze

Am 01.03.2013 04:35, schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff: > Backporting security fixes with Java has turned out to be more of less > unfeasible. I tried this once with DSA 2507 and I think that amounted to at > least > two man days of work for that update alone. Also, Ubuntu has shipped > backports to all

Processed: tagging 702293

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 702293 + moreinfo Bug #702293 [release.debian.org] unblock: dspam/3.10.1+dfsg-10 Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 702293: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug

Re: fixing bug 700891 acceptable?

Hi, On 03/03/2013 10:57 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 19:41 +0100, Joachim Reichel wrote: >> could you please let me know whether an upload to t-p-u with the patch >> in bug 700891 is acceptable in this stage of the freeze? > >>From a quick look it appears it could be suitabl

Incompatible change in the ifupdown hooks interface

Hi, while investigating on #699749 (which apparently affects many machines using NM, but not all of them), I discovered that the interface for ifupdown hooks has changed since squeeze. >From the manpage: When ifupdown is being called with the --all option, before doing any‐ thing

Bug#702373: unblock: ekiga/3.2.7-6

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package ekiga. Version 3.2.7-6 fixes security RC bug #702282. The debdiff is attached. unblock ekiga/3.2.7-6 Cheers, -- .''`.Sébastien Villemot : :' :Debian Devel

Bug#702275: unblock: libdatetime-timezone-perl/1.57-1+2013a

Hi, > Please unblock package libdatetime-timezone-perl 1.57-1+2013a. [...] > unblock libdatetime-timezone-perl/1.57-1+2013a Thanks for your work. I've reviewed the changes outside of lib/DateTime/TimeZone/ and they look good to me. I recommend the release team to grant this unblock request. Che

Bug#702373: marked as done (unblock: ekiga/3.2.7-6)

Your message dated Tue, 05 Mar 2013 20:56:30 +0100 with message-id <51364dee.1020...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#702373: unblock: ekiga/3.2.7-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #702373, regarding unblock: ekiga/3.2.7-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Re: fixing bug 700891 acceptable?

On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 20:12 +0100, Joachim Reichel wrote: > On 03/03/2013 10:57 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 19:41 +0100, Joachim Reichel wrote: > >> could you please let me know whether an upload to t-p-u with the patch > >> in bug 700891 is acceptable in this stage of the

Bug#702195: symlink conffiles are not supported, causing problems for dpkg on upgrade/removal and incorrect debsums reports

On 03.03.2013 22:53, Michael Biebl wrote: > > Seeing the poor handling of symlinked conffiles, I'm wondering if we > should also remove them for the other affected packages, which do that: > > acpid: > /etc/systemd/system/sockets.target.wants/acpid.socket > avahi-daemon: > /etc/systemd/system/d

Bug#702285: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-5

Hi, (Disclaimer: I'm not a member of the release team.) Benjamin Drung wrote (04 Mar 2013 19:24:49 GMT) : > Attached the debdiff for vlc 2.0.3-5 that I want to upload to testing to fix > the RC bug #685243. This proposed solution works around an apt bug/limitation. > unblock vlc/2.0.3-5 Thanks

Re: fixing bug 700891 acceptable?

On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 20:00 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 20:12 +0100, Joachim Reichel wrote: > > please find attached the debdiff between 4.0-4 and 4.0-5. Ok to upload? > > In general we'd tend to suggest 4.0-4+deb7u1 to make the > "out-of-sequence" nature of the upload ex

Bug#699624: unblock: blcr/0.8.5-1

Hi, Alan Woodland wrote (02 Feb 2013 13:23:22 GMT) : > 0.8.5-1 is the official upstream release that adds support for more recent > kernels > and fixes a number of other bugs which were discovered. This version fixes > #638339 in > the preferred way. #638339 was originally closed with a less tha

Bug#702173: pu: package openssh/1:5.5p1-6+squeeze3

Control: tags -1 + pending On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 17:22 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 03.03.2013 14:38, Colin Watson wrote: > > +openssh (1:5.5p1-6+squeeze4) stable; urgency=low > > + > > + * CVE-2011-5000: Fix potential int overflow when using > > gssapi-with-mac > > +authentation. > >

Processed: Re: Bug#702173: pu: package openssh/1:5.5p1-6+squeeze3

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #702173 [release.debian.org] pu: package openssh/1:5.5p1-6+squeeze3 Added tag(s) pending. -- 702173: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702173 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSC

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.16-6+squeeze11_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.16-6+squeeze11_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.16-6+squeeze11_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.16-6+squeeze11_kfreebsd-amd64.changes

Re: New version of musescore package

On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 22:02 +0100, intrigeri wrote: > Toby Smithe wrote (03 Mar 2013 16:42:59 GMT) : > > It would be really good to have this version 1.3 in wheezy, because > > of the "major nuisance" being fixed, but also because of the fact > > that I've fixed this new package to be buildable and

Bug#690248: marked as done (unblock: yforth/0.2.1-1)

Your message dated Tue, 05 Mar 2013 21:16:41 + with message-id <1362518201.29720.15.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#690248: unblock: yforth/0.2.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #690248, regarding unblock: yforth/0.2.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#702167: unblock: lvm2/2.02.95-7

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 12:56 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > Please ack upload to tpu to fix some bad decisions. It basicly reverts > the removal of clvm, which produced an outcry. Also it disables thin > provisioning support again, as it is neither usable nor save. > + >

Processed: Re: Bug#702167: unblock: lvm2/2.02.95-7

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #702167 [release.debian.org] unblock: lvm2/2.02.95-7 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 702167: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702167 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Bug#702123: marked as done (RM: python-selenium/2.2.0-1)

Your message dated Tue, 05 Mar 2013 21:30:17 + with message-id <1362519017.29720.20.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#702123: RM: python-selenium/2.2.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #702123, regarding RM: python-selenium/2.2.0-1 to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#702132: unblock: linux/3.2.39-2

Ben Hutchings (05/03/2013): > efivars from 3.2.39-2 will fail to load against the kernel from > 3.2.35-2. That basically breaks installation on UEFI from amd64 > netboot. That one is slightly annoying… I guess we could add that to the d-i errata page and point people there when they start compla

Bug#692212: unblock (pre-approval): pike7.8/7.8.700-2

On söndagen den 3 mars 2013, intrigeri wrote: > Niels Thykier wrote (03 Nov 2012 15:53:00 GMT) : > > I think we'd need to see a debdiff to determine if this is acceptable. > > Feel free to filter (e.g. w. filterdiff) autogenerated parts and > > translations (if those appear in the diff). Also if t

Bug#702195: symlink conffiles are not supported, causing problems for dpkg on upgrade/removal and incorrect debsums reports

On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 21:05 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > On 03.03.2013 22:53, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > > Seeing the poor handling of symlinked conffiles, I'm wondering if we > > should also remove them for the other affected packages, which do that: [...] > After a closer look, all those packag

Bug#702278: unblock: busybox/1:1.20.0-8

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:00:39PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Adam D. Barratt (04/03/2013): > > On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 19:07 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > please unblock busybox 1:1.20.0-8. It fixes CVE-2013-1813 > > security tracker says: > [squeeze] - busybox (Minor issue) Feel

Bug#702390: unblock: rsyslog/5.8.11-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package rsyslog It has a one-line fix to future-proof rsyslog's systemd service file to work with newer systemd versions. Complete debdiff is attached. Cheers, Michael un

Re: Incompatible change in the ifupdown hooks interface

Hi Joss, On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 08:39:45PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > while investigating on #699749 (which apparently affects many machines > using NM, but not all of them), I discovered that the interface for > ifupdown hooks has changed since squeeze. > >From the manpage: >Whe

Re: New version of musescore package

Dear all, On 5 March 2013 21:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 22:02 +0100, intrigeri wrote: >> A debdiff would help a lot to review the changes. > > Indeed. As a side note, new architecture support generally isn't > appropriate material for an unblock (hurd support possibly even

Bug#702206: unblock: graphviz/2.26.3-13

Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: > On 04/03/13 01:15, Christoph Egger wrote: >> +graphviz (2.26.3-13) unstable; urgency=low >> [...] >> + [ Christoph Egger ] >> + * Import patch by Steven Chamberlain to fix hangs on kfeebsd (Closes: >> #701832) > > Thank you for handling that... > > Please could

Bug#702394: unblock: ttf-cjk-compact/1.20

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-CC: ttf-cjk-comp...@packages.debian.org Hi, Please unblock ttf-cjk-compact/1.20 since it improves some glyph lacks in Japanese, Korean and Chinese language with graphical installer. -- Regards

Bug#702209: unblock (pre-approval): dpkg/1.16.10

Hi! There appears to be something in my dpkg unblock requests that seems to make the list setup unhappy (previously in #690920), just sending this so that it (hopefully) appears on the list. For the real details please see: Thanks, Gui

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: openssh_5.5p1-6+squeeze4_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openssh_5.5p1-6+squeeze4_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openssh_5.5p1-6+squeeze4_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openssh_5.5p1-6+squeeze4_kfreebsd-i386.changes

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: openssh_5.5p1-6+squeeze4_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openssh_5.5p1-6+squeeze4_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openssh_5.5p1-6+squeeze4_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a sub

Re: New version of musescore package

On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 23:38 +, Toby Smithe wrote: > On 5 March 2013 21:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 22:02 +0100, intrigeri wrote: > >> A debdiff would help a lot to review the changes. > > > > Indeed. As a side note, new architecture support generally isn't > > appropri

Bug#702406: nmu: binutils-mingw-w64_2 to pick up fix for #688951

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, binutils recently added a fix for #688951 (CVE-2012-3509) which also affects binutils-mingw-w64. The following binNMU will cause the fix to be applied to binutils-mingw-w64: nmu binutil

Bug#692212: unblock (pre-approval): pike7.8/7.8.700-2

Control: tag -1 - moreinfo Hi, (disclaimer: I'm not part of the release team.) Magnus Holmgren wrote (05 Mar 2013 21:40:16 GMT) : > I did send a prompt reply to debian-release, as you can see here: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/11/msg00122.html Thanks for the pointer. So:

Processed: Re: Bug#692212: unblock (pre-approval): pike7.8/7.8.700-2

Processing control commands: > tag -1 - moreinfo Bug #692212 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): pike7.8/7.8.700-2 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 692212: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692212 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To U

Bug#702406: marked as done (nmu: binutils-mingw-w64_2 to pick up fix for #688951)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Mar 2013 07:49:19 + with message-id <1bc76ffab85f6b7e4d984a9793428...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#702406: nmu: binutils-mingw-w64_2 to pick up fix for #688951 has caused the Debian Bug report #702406, regarding nmu: binutils-mingw-w64_2 to pi