On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 23:38 +0000, Toby Smithe wrote: > On 5 March 2013 21:18, Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > > On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 22:02 +0100, intrigeri wrote: > >> A debdiff would help a lot to review the changes. > > > > Indeed. As a side note, new architecture support generally isn't > > appropriate material for an unblock (hurd support possibly even more so, > > as the architecture isn't in testing). > > That may well be, though I'm not sure how it could hurt, especially > since at least as far as kFreeBSD is concerned, musescore works > entirely as expected (I tested it there). Surely you want as few (eg) > build failures as possible?
In general, sure, improved architecture support is great. During a freeze however it's often more of a "feature" and generally won't be as well tested as previously supported architectures. > As for the debdiff, please see my earlier subsequent message. fwiw I can't find said earlier message either in my mail or the -release web archive. Note that if the diff were more than a few 100kb in size it's entirely possible that the list server silently dropped it. In that case please consider producing a filtered debdiff, excluding e.g. translations, but clearly indicating how it was filtered. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1362548766.29720.25.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
