On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
> Does it work if you remove those checks in
>
> dolfin/site-packages/dolfin/compilemodules/compilemodule.py
> dolfin/site-packages/dolfin/compilemodules/jit.py
>
> ?
Yes, it works fine, but I also had to remove the check in
ufc_utils/bui
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:08:48PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Thanks for your patience. It should be fine to go ahead now. #676100
> will need to be fixed, but that may just mean dropping the
> libxmmsclient-ruby* packages.
Ok, thanks. I just uploaded libcdio 0.83-4 to unstable.
Cheers,
-
Your message dated Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:22:25 +0200
with message-id <87txyedz8u@karaba.cepremap.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#676906: nmu: atlas_3.8.4-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #676906,
regarding nmu: atlas_3.8.4-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
On 12/06/2012 22:49, Joachim Breitner wrote:
A) Upload the fixed haskell-cryptocipher to unstable, let it build
on mips, s390, s390x and sparc, remove stuff on powerpc, migrate.
B) Remove stuff on mips, powerpc, s390, s390x and sparc, migrate.
FTR, a solution smilar to B has been chosen (i.e
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package lv2file, it does no longer build on non-Linux due
to the lack of support for those architectures in lilv.
unblock lv2file/0.83-1
-- System Information:
Debian Releas
Hello,
Alessio Treglia (14/06/2012):
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package lv2file, it does no longer build on non-Linux due
> to the lack of support for those architectures in lilv.
>
> unb
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> 1. It is not blocked.
> 2. You need to get those binary packages removed.
> 3. For that you file a bug (or reassign this one) against ftp.debian.org
Done, thanks and sorry for the noise.
Cheers!
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessi
On 14/06/12 12:10, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Alessio Treglia (14/06/2012):
>> [...]
>> unblock lv2file/0.83-1
> [...]
> 2. You need to get those binary packages removed.
Or it's new dependency, lilv, just needs porting to kFreeBSD, then
lv2file will probably build there again?
The issue with lilv
On 06/14/2012 09:46 AM, Johannes Ring wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
Does it work if you remove those checks in
dolfin/site-packages/dolfin/compilemodules/compilemodule.py
dolfin/site-packages/dolfin/compilemodules/jit.py
?
Yes, it works fine, but I also
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Johan Hake wrote:
> On 06/14/2012 09:46 AM, Johannes Ring wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
>>> Does it work if you remove those checks in
>>>
>>> dolfin/site-packages/dolfin/compilemodules/compilemodule.py
>>> dolfin/site-packag
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 12:21:28AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[...]
> Did that on all archictectures:
>
> kibi@grieg:~$ wb nmu apvlv calibre cups-filters epdfview gdcm gimp
> gle-graphics gnome-commander gpdftext gummi inkscape libextractor
> pdf-presenter-console pdf2djvu pdf2svg pdfcube pdf
Hi!
I've renamed tclvfs binary package to tcl-vfs, and now it cannot pass
to testing because of the old tclvfs binary packages there. Could
someone hint it to go to testing?
--
Sergei Golovan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On 2012-06-14 14:58, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've renamed tclvfs binary package to tcl-vfs, and now it cannot pass
> to testing because of the old tclvfs binary packages there. Could
> someone hint it to go to testing?
>
Hi,
You need to get the old binaries removed by the ftp-masters in
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> You need to get the old binaries removed by the ftp-masters in unstable.
> Usuaully, the old binaries are automatically discovered if there are no
> reverse (build-)dependencies, but dak reports visual-regexp as being
> "possibly broken" by
Hi Ricardo!
Alle giovedì 14 giugno 2012, Ricardo Mones ha scritto:
> Seems rebuild has triggered http://bugs.debian.org/677345
> Should I wait until poppler 0.18 transition ends or should I upload
> the fix right now?
poppler 0.18 migrated to testing, so you can go ahead in fixing that
(and
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 04:06:48PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Hi Ricardo!
>
> Alle giovedì 14 giugno 2012, Ricardo Mones ha scritto:
> > Seems rebuild has triggered http://bugs.debian.org/677345
> > Should I wait until poppler 0.18 transition ends or should I upload
> > the fix right now?
>
Alle domenica 10 giugno 2012, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto:
> On Sat, 2012-06-09 at 22:52 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > A "kde-workspace4.8" tracker would be nice, at least for the few
> > workspace libraries that bumped soname:
> >
> > * kde-workspace-dev/kdebase-workspace-dev (src:kde-workspace):
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 14:19:21 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote:
> The simplest solution would be to rebuild UFC and DOLFIN whenever a
> new version of SWIG is added in Debian. That's why i requested a
> binNMU. Not sure if it would be possible to automate this in some way.
>
If dolfin only works wit
Hello.
Since the wheezy freeze is nearby, I wanted to notify the Release Team
about possible issue with qemu-kvm package.
Currently, wheezy has version 1.0 of qemu-kvm, which contains quite a
few bugs fixed in next version, which is 1.1. But the problem is that,
due to a few last-minute regressi
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 04:36:40AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
>> Does this mean M-A:same packages should be prevented from being
>> binNMUed, but only source upload can be accepted?
>
> You cannot deprive the Release Team of this tool. Also multiarch
Michael Gilbert (14/06/2012):
> package (version) sid; urgency=low
>
> * Binary-only non-maintainer upload; no source changes.
>
> -- Debian Release Team Tue, 05 Jun
> 2012 16:33:05 +
>
> or some other appropriate binnmu mailing address. This would also
> mean rebuilding all of the ot
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Michael Gilbert (14/06/2012):
>> package (version) sid; urgency=low
>>
>> * Binary-only non-maintainer upload; no source changes.
>>
>> -- Debian Release Team Tue, 05 Jun
>> 2012 16:33:05 +
>>
>> or some other appropriate binnmu m
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:25:42 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Wouldn't the ideal solution be non-architecture-specific changelogs?
No, that would be very much non-ideal. One should be able to schedule
binNMUs for a subset of archs, and one shouldn't have to look up whether
a package builds m-
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:25:42 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>
>> Wouldn't the ideal solution be non-architecture-specific changelogs?
>
> No, that would be very much non-ideal. One should be able to schedule
> binNMUs for a subset of arc
On 06/12/2012 04:22 AM, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Therefore the php maintainers decided to drop the patch from the
> 5.3 packaging a few months ago (there were also some bugs and
> slowdowns with the patch) [1].
Isn't it possible to disable these slowdowns with environment values, as
the suhosin aut
Hi,
I am willingly avoiding to ask for transitions of both the miniupnpc
library, and PHP nusoap, in order to not break things before the freeze.
I don't think there's any major feature or bug fixes that would need
such pain.
If anyone thinks this is a bad decision, and that we should rush to
cha
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
at the moment the package libvirtuoso5.5-cil isn't being built for s390 since
mono isn't being built for s390 as well, see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657781
Therefore could you please remove the binary package libvirtuoso
Hi
I'd like to fix an boot error of Xen on several newer machines in
stable.
xen (4.0.1-6) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
[ Ian Campbell ]
* Backport fix to remove lowmem 1:1 mapping that fixes boot on some
classes of machines. (Closes: #649923)
-- Bastian Blank Thu, 14 Jun 2012 20:27:03 +0
reassign 677554 ftp.debian.org
retitle 677554 RM: libvirtuoso5.5-cil [s390] -- RoM; ANAIS
thanks
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 20:45 +0200, José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
> At the moment the package libvirtuoso5.5-cil isn't being built for s390 since
> mono isn't being built for s390 as well, see
> h
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 677554 ftp.debian.org
Bug #677554 [release.debian.org] RM: libvirtuoso5.5-cil old binary package for
s390
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #677554 to th
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 20:51 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> I'd like to fix an boot error of Xen on several newer machines in
> stable.
I'm assuming this is fixed in at least unstable already, given the dates
of the commits referenced in the bug report?
> xen (4.0.1-6) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
>
>
On sam., 2012-05-26 at 16:41 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On lun., 2012-05-14 at 23:13 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On lun., 2012-05-14 at 20:45 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> So, this is another friendly ping about the main issue. Can I upload a
> new 4.6 xfce4-panel which adds the C
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 07:55:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 20:51 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > I'd like to fix an boot error of Xen on several newer machines in
> > stable.
> I'm assuming this is fixed in at least unstable already, given the dates
> of the commits re
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Ondrej, is your plan still to leave suhosin as a build option in the
> source package like you wrote early last February, so that those who
> want it can just switch that option and rebuild? I can see in the
> debian/rules that there's still
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 01:59:25PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> I did not suggest that. Anyway, maybe this will be a bit clearer.
> Let's say an existing package is at version +b1 on amd64, and it needs
> to get a binnmu, then a +b2 package is built on amd64, its changelog
> is taken and stuffe
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 16:45 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Alle domenica 10 giugno 2012, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto:
> > On Sat, 2012-06-09 at 22:52 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/kde-workspace4.8.html
[...]
> > > kshutdown (*)
[...]
> > > plasma-wid
Dear Release Team,
Ron Lee recently asked every maintainer with a package depending on one
of our libs to remove them. It is not clear to me why he did that. All
problem with our packages relevant for the new stable release have been
solved (I have only one wishlist ticket left on my QA page).
By
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 01:59:25PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> I did not suggest that. Anyway, maybe this will be a bit clearer.
>> Let's say an existing package is at version +b1 on amd64, and it needs
>> to get a binnmu, then a +b2 pack
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
i'd like to update libv8 3.8.9.20 to 3.10.8.
* packages needing a simple rebuild (i checked them) :
+ libv8-i18n
+ osmium
+ drizzle
* packages needing more work :
nodejs (i'
tag 677574 pending
thanks
Jérémy Lal (15/06/2012):
> * packages needing a simple rebuild (i checked them) :
> + libv8-i18n
> + osmium
> + drizzle
>
> * packages needing more work :
> nodejs (i'm maintaining it and it's ready to be uploaded)
>
> Please note that SONAME is libv8.so.3.10.8
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 677574 pending
Bug #677574 [release.debian.org] transition: libv8
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
677574: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677574
Debian Bu
41 matches
Mail list logo
