On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Johan Hake <hake....@gmail.com> wrote: > On 06/14/2012 09:46 AM, Johannes Ring wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Anders Logg<l...@simula.no> wrote: >>> Does it work if you remove those checks in >>> >>> dolfin/site-packages/dolfin/compilemodules/compilemodule.py >>> dolfin/site-packages/dolfin/compilemodules/jit.py >>> >>> ? >> >> Yes, it works fine, but I also had to remove the check in >> ufc_utils/build.py in UFC. >> >>> If so, we might turn those into warnings. > > Not sure why we would like to do that? If we are going to ship precompiled > binaries we better make sure all packages including JIT compiled stuff are > using the same SWIG version. > > We have not got any reports of this not working (because we have prevented > it), but I think it would be gambling to allow this. If an error occur it > will most probably be very cryptic and implode the user experience.
Good point. > Can't this be handled by some elaborated debain version logic? The simplest solution would be to rebuild UFC and DOLFIN whenever a new version of SWIG is added in Debian. That's why i requested a binNMU. Not sure if it would be possible to automate this in some way. Johannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caljqy_fu4svhccgznqf+xv3n3p6xkboexcbump0muubtau_...@mail.gmail.com
