Fwd: binNMUs for gdk-pixbuf upload

2011-07-16 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Forwarding to debian-release@, in charge of binNMUs. - Forwarded message from Michael Biebl - Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 01:48:01 +0200 From: Michael Biebl To: debian-wb-t...@lists.debian.org CC: Steve Langasek Subject: binNMUs for gdk-pixbuf upload User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i

Re: Fwd: binNMUs for gdk-pixbuf upload

2011-07-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 10:25 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Forwarding to debian-release@, in charge of binNMUs. > > - Forwarded message from Michael Biebl - [...] > As part of the multiarch conversion I removed the libtool .la files. > I checked all rdeps of gdk-pixbuf according to [1],

Re: Fwd: binNMUs for gdk-pixbuf upload

2011-07-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 11:03 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > - Forwarded message from Michael Biebl - [...] > > libunicap2-dev (src:unicap) > > libvdk2-dev (src:vdk2) > > libmdc2-dev (src:xmedcon) > > > > Please schedule binNMUs for those packages with a dep-wait on > > gdk-pixbuf_2

The SONAME bump of glew

2011-07-16 Thread Niels Thykier
Hi Joost It has come to our attention that you have bumped the SONAME of the glew libraries. Unfortunately we do not see any records of you informing us of this library transition. There is now a risk that this will stall the poppler transition that we were hoping to finish soon[0]. I will fil

Bug#634052: transition: glew

2011-07-16 Thread Niels Thykier
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Transition bug for glew; Joost can you follow up if there are any thing we should be aware of? ~Niels - -- System Information: Debia

Bug#634052: transition: glew

2011-07-16 Thread Joost Yervante Damad
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 13:53:03 +0200 Niels Thykier wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi > > Transition bug for glew; Joost can you follow up if th

Bug#634052: transition: glew

2011-07-16 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2011-07-16 14:10, Joost Yervante Damad wrote: > On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 13:53:03 +0200 > Niels Thykier wrote: > >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: transition >> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >>

Re: The SONAME bump of glew

2011-07-16 Thread Joost Yervante Damad
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 13:52:51 +0200 Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi Joost > > It has come to our attention that you have bumped the SONAME of the > glew libraries. Unfortunately we do not see any records of you > informing us of this library transition. There is now a risk that > this will stall the

Bug#634052: transition: glew

2011-07-16 Thread Joost Yervante Damad
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 14:48:57 +0200 Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2011-07-16 14:10, Joost Yervante Damad wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 13:53:03 +0200 > > Niels Thykier wrote: > > > >> Package: release.debian.org > >> Severity: normal > >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > >> Usertags:

Bug#634052: transition: glew

2011-07-16 Thread Joost Yervante Damad
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 14:48:57 +0200 Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2011-07-16 14:10, Joost Yervante Damad wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 13:53:03 +0200 > > Niels Thykier wrote: > > > >> Package: release.debian.org > >> Severity: normal > >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > >> Usertags:

Bug#634052: transition: glew

2011-07-16 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2011-07-16 15:15, Joost Yervante Damad wrote: > On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 14:48:57 +0200 > Niels Thykier wrote: > >> [...] >> >> I have checked the 1.5.8-3 -> 1.6.0-2 diff plus the news from >> upstream[1] and I get the feeling the SONAME bump is unneeded. >> >> in config/version: >> SO_MAJOR = $(

Re: [SRM] Stable update for libpcap

2011-07-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 19:57 +0200, Romain Francoise wrote: > I'd like to upload the following update for libpcap in squeeze, it > addresses two bugs: Thanks for working on this, and sorry for the slight delay in getting back to you. > - #612803: device detection is broken if the bonding modu

Re: [SRM] Stable update for libpcap

2011-07-16 Thread Romain Francoise
Hi Adam, Thanks for your review! "Adam D. Barratt" writes: > So far as I can see from the diff and reading the log for #623868, this > also includes changes related to #625443; is that correct? The bug log > there mentions that the problem only occurs with libpcap 1.1.1-4, > whereas squeeze ha

Re: [SRU] non-free/clustalw and non-free/clustalx relicensed to LGPL-3+.

2011-07-16 Thread Philipp Kern
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 10:33:06AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > I understand your decision for clustalx. I think that there would still be a > benefit to have clustalw in main for Squeeze, in particular for the generation > of entirely Free Squeeze derivatives for science. While we offer a larg

NEW changes in oldproposedupdates

2011-07-16 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: horde3_3.2.2+debian0-2+lenny3_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: oprofile_0.9.3-2+lenny2_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: oprofile_0.9.3-2+lenny2_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: oprofile_0.9.3-2+lenny2_armel.changes ACCEPT Proce

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2011-07-16 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: xml-security-c_1.5.1-3+squeeze1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: xml-security-c_1.5.1-3+squeeze1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: xml-security-c_1.5.1-3+squeeze1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: xml-security-c_1.5.1-3+squeeze1_ia6