On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 14:48:57 +0200 Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> wrote:
> On 2011-07-16 14:10, Joost Yervante Damad wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 13:53:03 +0200 > > Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> wrote: > > > >> Package: release.debian.org > >> Severity: normal > >> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > >> Usertags: transition > >> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> Hash: SHA256 > >> > >> Hi > >> > >> Transition bug for glew; Joost can you follow up if there are any > >> thing we should be aware of? > > > > Normally they should all just build fine. > > > > Joost > > > > I have checked the 1.5.8-3 -> 1.6.0-2 diff plus the news from > upstream[1] and I get the feeling the SONAME bump is unneeded. > > in config/version: > SO_MAJOR = $(GLEW_MAJOR).$(GLEW_MINOR) > [...] > LDFLAGS.SO = -shared -Wl,-soname=$(LIB.SONAME) [...] > > in config/Makefile.linux: > LIB.SONAME = lib$(NAME).so.$(SO_MAJOR) > > I suspect that upstream got the SONAME part wrong here and > $(GLEW_MINOR) is not supposed to be in the SONAME. Could you please > ask your upstream if they really intended to do a SONAME bump for > "minor bug fixes and some new extensions"? There indeed are two symbols removed besides the usual additions: -__glPNTrianglewesfATI -__glPNTrianglewesiATI That could be a valid reason I guess. Joost -- Joost Yervante Damad - http://damad.be/joost/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110716151526.01746...@ancalagon.local.teluna.org
