Bug#624637: transition: libquicktime

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi! I've uploaded the new release of libquicktime to experimental and I'd like to upload it to unstable too. Although the SONAME has been bumped I think no porting is needed, so a rebui

Bug#619117: perl 5.12 transition

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 01:04:02AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 15:40:56 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > - apparmor (only in sid) > > - gbrowse (only in sid) > > - gpib (RC buggy, only in sid) > > - hyperestraier (FTBFS on mips) > > - libgimp-perl (only in sid, RC buggy)

Bug#624637: transition: libquicktime

Alessio Treglia writes: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi! > > I've uploaded the new release of libquicktime to experimental and I'd like to > upload it to unstable too. > Although the SONAME has been bum

Bug#619117: perl 5.12 transition

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:30:57 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > I've put my notes from rebuild tests at > > > This adds > > - courier #622014 > - kildclient #623726 > - libafs-perl #623924, #621999 > - libclone-fast-perl (5.12

Bug#624637: transition: libquicktime

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Christian Marillat wrote: > Would be nice to know why *Debian* change the library soname. A symbol has been dropped and some functions signature have changed. Is it enough for you? -- Alessio Treglia          | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer         |

Bug#624637: transition: libquicktime

Alessio Treglia writes: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Christian Marillat > wrote: >> Would be nice to know why *Debian* change the library soname. > > A symbol has been dropped and some functions signature have changed. > Is it enough for you? Which symbol and wich functions ? Christian

Bug#624647: pu: package akonadi/1.3.1-3+squeeze1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hello, Please consider accepting the patch fixing #545139 [1] to squeeze (full debdiff is below). It can be considered as regression from lenny (KDE 3) since kmail used to work fine when HOME wa

Bug#624637: transition: libquicktime

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Christian Marillat wrote: > Which symbol and wich functions ? lqt_start_audio_vbr_chunk is no longer provided [1] by the shlib. Other changes have been made to exported symbols (like quicktime_write_chunk_footer, quicktime_write_chunk_header) [2]. [1] http://gi

Bug#624637: transition: libquicktime

Alessio Treglia writes: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Christian Marillat > wrote: >> Would be nice to know why *Debian* change the library soname. > > A symbol has been dropped and some functions signature have changed. OK I see. > Is it enough for you? For me ? You always forget that I

Bug#624637: transition: libquicktime

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Christian Marillat wrote: > For me ? You always forget that I'm a Debian developper and here my > main concern is to have Debian binaries installable in other distro and > vice versa. OK, and sorry to have been rude. Keep up the good work! -- Alessio Treglia

Re: [SRU] kupfer_0+v201-2+squeeze1

Il 15/04/2011 20:06, Luca Falavigna ha scritto: > Il 14/04/2011 23:29, Philipp Kern ha scritto: >> After staring at the code a little longer: what keybinder returns from that >> function is a guint32, so shouldn't it be TYPE_UINT? And why does it >> overflow? I guess the reason it overflows comes

Bug#620210: pu: package samba/2:3.5.6~dfsg3-squeeze3

tag 620210 + confirmed thanks On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 06:59 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Since the servers run the packages I intend to upload to > propsed-updates, this bug is no longer hereand we started > uploading 64-bit drivers to the servers and migrating the Win7 > machines from stan

Processed: Re: Bug#620210: pu: package samba/2:3.5.6~dfsg3-squeeze3

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 620210 + confirmed Bug #620210 [release.debian.org] pu: package samba/2:3.5.6~dfsg3-squeeze3 Added tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 620210: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre

Bug#624591: transition: libgmp3c2 → libgmp10

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 23:49:07 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Filing this to track the missing rebuilds. Once they're done we'll be > able to remove the gmp4 source package. > Remaining packages follow. A whole lot are probably stuck until the haskell stuff settles down :/ - acl2 (rebuilds s

Processed: block 624591 with 553947 594279 615776 536905 621808

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 624591 with 553947 594279 615776 536905 621808 Bug #624591 [release.debian.org] transition: libgmp3c2 → libgmp10 Was blocked by: 606642 623162 614486 624588 620573 624593 620528 621879 618127 623598 594281 Added blocking bug(s) of 624591:

Bug#547393: libjpeg8 transition.

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 01:53:03PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:13:08 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 03:33:42PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > Hi Bill, > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 18:08:21 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > > >

Re: vlc: security update breaks mp3 support

Hi, As this regression was apparently caused by a security update, I've added the security team to CC. On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 14:43 +0200, Christoph Goehre wrote: > After I update from vlc version 0.8.6.h-4+lenny2.3 to 0.8.6.h-4+lenny3, > I couldn't play any mp3 music file. If I reinstall the old

Bug#619850: pu: package iceowl/1.0~b1+dfsg2-2.squeeze1.diff

[Apologies for managing to miss this earlier] Hi, On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 22:27 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:, > I'd like to push iceowl 1.0~b1+dfsg2-2.squeeze1 to squeeze proposed > updates. It contains the same updates as current icedove. Presumably this now requires a further update, in light of

Re: Bug#622817: perl: CVE-2011-1487: taint laundering in lc, uc

* Adam D. Barratt: > I do share Florian's concern about the potential breakage as a result of > the change. Do we have any idea how many packages in {old,}stable would > be affected and to what degree? Particularly in the case of oldstable, > with its four month update cycle, fixing packages bro

Processed (with 1 errors): blocking bugs of perl 5.12 transition

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 619117 with 622014 623726 623924 621999 615571 621466 623927 617212 > 613188 620777 624255 623928 579450 616454 623930 624578 621940 620936 Bug #619117 [release.debian.org] perl 5.12 transition Was blocked by: 618871 624597 613780 620777 Ad

Processed: Raising severity for bugs blocking perl 5.12 transition

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 555000 serious Bug #555000 [src:kildclient] FTBFS with binutils-gold Bug #623726 [src:kildclient] kildclient: FTBFS: undefined reference to symbol 'inflate' Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' Severity set to 'serious' from 'impo

Processed: block 619117 with 621078

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 619117 with 621078 Bug #619117 [release.debian.org] perl 5.12 transition Was blocked by: 620936 613188 623924 555000 621999 623929 579450 618871 615571 616454 623928 623726 624597 622014 620777 621940 624578 623927 621466 624255 613780 606

NEW changes in proposedupdates

Processing changes file: iceape_2.0.11-5_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceape_2.0.11-5_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceape_2.0.11-5_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceape_2.0.11-5_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceape_2.0.11-5_kfre

Bug#547393: libjpeg8 transition.

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:13:53PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > They'll still need to be fixed when we make the switch, since some of > > them are libraries with a non-trivial number of reverse dependencies. > > Of course one option could be to make them build-depend on > > libjpeg62-dev, but i

Re: Bug#622817: perl: CVE-2011-1487: taint laundering in lc, uc

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 06:26:51PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Adam D. Barratt: > > > I do share Florian's concern about the potential breakage as a result of > > the change. Do we have any idea how many packages in {old,}stable would > > be affected and to what degree? I don't think we hav

Bug#624716: [britney2] Does not properly undo failed migrations

Package: release.debian.org Severity: important User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertag: britney Filing as a bug so it's documented somewhere more formal and doesn't get forgotten. On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 10:29 +, Cron Daemon wrote: > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/s

Re: Stable update of linux-2.6

On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 17:37 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 17:35 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 12:57 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > I think there's still a Xen regression (since 2.6.32-31) to be fixed. > > > > I'm assuming that's #621072, which it

Bug#619117: perl 5.12 transition

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 02:20:29PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > ATM that gives 4164 binNMUs for 392 source packages > (http://release.debian.org/~jcristau/perl5.12-binNMUs.txt). > > I hadn't planned on making it multiple rounds, hoping that > BD-Uninstallable checks would sort it all out for me

Bug#624591: transition: libgmp3c2 → libgmp10

On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:25:04 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > - gcc-mingw32 (build-depends on mingw-w64, which depends on > gcc-mingw-w64, which only exists on i386 and amd64; so all screwed up, > somebody should file a bug) I hadn't expected this to become urgent, I'll fix it this weekend (on

Re: Processed: block 619117 with 624597 613780 620777

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:39:08PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > > > block 619117 with 624597 613780 620777 > Bug #619117 [release.debian.org] perl 5.12 transition > Was blocked by: 618871 > Added blocking bug(s) of 619117: 624597, 61

Re: nmu: Please binNMU binutils-mingw-w64 on i386

Hi again, On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:57:04 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: > Since binutils is now up to 2.21.51.20110421-2, may I suggest > > nmu binutils-mingw-w64_0.1 . amd64 i386 . -m "Rebuild for binutils > 2.21.51.20110421-2." Sorry for the to-ing and fro-ing, I'll actually be uploading a new binu

Re: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:28:43PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > - be less strict and keep old binaries (and thus 2 versions of the same > > source package) in testing. This applies in particular for libraries > > going through SONAME changes and which can happily coexist during a > > tran

Processed: block 619117 with 624255

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 619117 with 624255 Bug #619117 [release.debian.org] perl 5.12 transition Was blocked by: 555000 623924 613188 620936 621999 623929 621078 579450 618871 615571 616454 623928 623726 623930 624597 622014 620777 621940 621466 623927 624578 624

Re: [SRU] kupfer_0+v201-2+squeeze1

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:53:56PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Il 15/04/2011 20:06, Luca Falavigna ha scritto: > > Il 14/04/2011 23:29, Philipp Kern ha scritto: > >> After staring at the code a little longer: what keybinder returns from that > >> function is a guint32, so shouldn't it be TYPE_UI

move to britney2?

* Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org) [110430 23:24]: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:28:43PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > > - be less strict and keep old binaries (and thus 2 versions of the same > > > source package) in testing. This applies in particular for libraries > > > going through S

Bug#619117: perl 5.12 transition

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 09:51:49PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 02:20:29PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > ATM that gives 4164 binNMUs for 392 source packages > > (http://release.debian.org/~jcristau/perl5.12-binNMUs.txt). > > > > I hadn't planned on making it mul

Re: move to britney2?

On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 23:35 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org) [110430 23:24]: > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:28:43PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > > > > - be less strict and keep old binaries (and thus 2 versions of the same > > > > source package) in testing

Bug#623719: marked as done (transition: muparser)

Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2011 00:28:09 +0200 with message-id <4dbc8cf9.2010...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#623719: nmu: Please bin nmu the following for a SONAME bump of libmuparser has caused the Debian Bug report #623719, regarding transition: muparser to be marked as done. This

Re: move to britney2?

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:35:22PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org) [110430 23:24]: > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:28:43PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > > - be less strict and keep old binaries (and thus 2 versions of the same > > > > source package) in test

Re: move to britney2?

* Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org) [110501 01:08]: > We certainly did. It's not a new idea, and I certainly don't suggest that > switching to b2 will suddenly cause patches to appear. But OTOH, the > current muddled state of britney maintenance does make it harder for anyone > to submit patches