Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package iceweasel
3.5.14-1 was unblocked and due to migrate in 2 days, but there is a
zero-day vulnerability fix that needed to be pushed, and that happened
in 3.5.15-1. This
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package iceape
2.0.9-1 was unblocked and due to migrate in 4 days, but there is a
zero-day vulnerability fix that needed to be pushed, and that happened
in 2.0.10-1. This is
Hi,
A lesson we learned from Lenny is that ia32-libs is hardly security
supportable if the libraries it contained aren't as much up to date as
their 'normal' stable versions as possible. In the ideal situation we
would release with a ia32-libs being completely up to date with the normal
package ve
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:26:50 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A lesson we learned from Lenny is that ia32-libs is hardly security
> supportable if the libraries it contained aren't as much up to date as
> their 'normal' stable versions as possible. In the ideal situation we
> would rel
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:26:50AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> A lesson we learned from Lenny is that ia32-libs is hardly security
> supportable if the libraries it contained aren't as much up to date as
> their 'normal' stable versions as possible. In the ideal situation we
> would release wit
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 08:16:41PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > You can't build 32bit packages for amd64 in a 32bit chroot. That results
> > in the wrong arch and wrong dependencies.
> But you can use i386 packages on amd64 in a 32bit chroot. That results
> in much less crack smoking all aroun
Hello Release Team,
There are ugly crash bugs in current abiword (2.8.2) that have been
dealt with in later releases.
I'm proposing an an exception to see that that the latest version is
included in squeeze. The katest abiword has now been uploaded to the FTP
archive's queue (2010-10-28; delayed
Philipp Kern writes:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 08:16:41PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> > You can't build 32bit packages for amd64 in a 32bit chroot. That results
>> > in the wrong arch and wrong dependencies.
>> But you can use i386 packages on amd64 in a 32bit chroot. That results
>> in much
Your message dated Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:15:01 +0200
with message-id <20101029111501.gv3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#601638: please unblock libidn/1.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #601638,
regarding please unblock libidn/1.18-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package fuss-launcher
fuss-launcher (0.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Port to new Xapian API. Closes: #601760
-- Enrico Zini Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:55:13 +0200
It
On 29/10/2010 07:19, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi Release team
>
> I (with help of others) have corrected a number of important bugs and one
> release critial issue for the vzctl package. You can see the changes below.
>
There is:
--- vzctl-3.0.24/etc/init.d/initd-functions.in
+++ vzctl-3.0.24/etc
Your message dated Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:37:31 +0200
with message-id <4ccab1fb.5070...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#601764: unblock: fuss-launcher/0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #601764,
regarding unblock: fuss-launcher/0.5-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
On 29/10/2010 10:48, Jari Aalto wrote:
>
> Hello Release Team,
>
> There are ugly crash bugs in current abiword (2.8.2) that have been
> dealt with in later releases.
>
> I'm proposing an an exception to see that that the latest version is
> included in squeeze. The katest abiword has now been
On 29/10/2010 04:22, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Release team,
>
> I would like approval to upload shorewall/4.4.11.6-2. Please see the
> attached diff for all of the changes.
>
It looks ok. Please go ahead with the upload and let us know once the
pacakge has been uploaded and accepted. (Pleas
Le vendredi 29 octobre 2010 à 13:59 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
> > The update of abiword was discussed in #debian-release 2010-10-20 12:46
> > (Josselin Mouette) with regards to the status of goffice being solved
> > first. This appears to be done according to
> > https://buildd.debian.org/stat
On 29/10/2010 14:17, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 29 octobre 2010 à 13:59 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
>>> The update of abiword was discussed in #debian-release 2010-10-20
>>> 12:46 (Josselin Mouette) with regards to the status of goffice
>>> being solved first. This appears to be done
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 23:18:47 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
>> Since the planned way to keep clamav updated in Squeeze will be by
>> updating to the latest current clamav stable release, the same should
>> naturally apply during
Hi Mehdi
Thanks. Will upload a new corrected version now.
It was tested, but for some reason I did not catch this one.
Best regards,
// Ola
Quoting "Mehdi Dogguy" :
On 29/10/2010 07:19, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Release team
I (with help of others) have corrected a number of important bugs a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I'd like to request an unblock for fusionforge/5.0.2-4, which is just a
cherry-pick of two bugfixes from upstream. The first one is actually a
fix for a regression introduced by 5.0.2-
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please consider unblocking package libice
Relevant fix you might want to push into squeeze:
| * Cherry-pick from upstream:
| + 0001-Set-the-close-on-exec-flag-for-listening-sockets.pa
Your message dated Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:43:05 +0200
with message-id <4ccacf69.2000...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#601775: unblock: libice/2:1.0.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #601775,
regarding unblock: libice/2:1.0.6-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Mehdi,
Thanks for reporting that! It's my bug :( and I am also unsure
how this went unnoticed.
Fixed in vzctl git:
http://git.openvz.org/?p=vzctl;a=commit;h=3527cc269bb51d48e0f511fbf7a807ad56c223d5
On 10/29/2010 04:16 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Mehdi
Thanks. Will upload a new corrected versi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package freeimage. This version uses external libs
instead of embedded copies for everything but tiff, and updates the
embedded tiff to the latest version in sid. There's so
On 29/10/2010 16:05, tony mancill wrote:
> On 10/29/2010 05:26 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>>
>> If the maintainer if ok with the NMU, why is it in delayed/2?
>> Couldn't you reschedule it to delayed/0?
>
> I uploaded to delayed/2 because Jari and I are in different timezones
> and I thought there m
On 10/29/2010 05:26 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 29/10/2010 14:17, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le vendredi 29 octobre 2010 à 13:59 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
The update of abiword was discussed in #debian-release 2010-10-20
12:46 (Josselin Mouette) with regards to the status of goffice
Your message dated Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:59:13 +0100
with message-id <1288364353.30602.91.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#601773: release.debian.org: unblock:
fusionforge/5.0.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #601773,
regarding release.debian.org: unblock: fusionforg
Hi,
Apologies for the late reply on this. For some reason I thought it had
been replied to earlier but realised it hadn't whilst tidying up my
mail.
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 16:44 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> * #546528: This seems to be "only" a policy violation and I have not
>found any rep
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 02:02:13PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 29/10/2010 04:22, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > Release team,
> >
> > I would like approval to upload shorewall/4.4.11.6-2. Please see the
> > attached diff for all of the changes.
> >
>
> It looks ok. Please go ahead with the
Hi Kir
When I tested this it was obvious that this did not work as well as it should.
I have applied two more patches to make it work as it should. This problem must
have been masked by the other problem.
A bugreport will be sent shortly.
Best regards,
// Ola
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 05:09:03PM
Hi Mehdi
I'm now re-requesting to unblock vzctl.
I have uploaded an updated version with a correction to the problem
you noted. This correction was not enough though. So I have applied a few
more things.
1) The init script return with error 1 when already started or already stopped.
This makes t
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 22:58 +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> Le samedi 23 octobre 2010 15:06:13, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> > > >>* Enable rxtx support:
> > > >> - d/control: Add Build-Depends on librxtx-java.
[...]
> > > If this is too much for squeeze, I can disable this rxtx support
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 16:24:54 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> unblock freeimage/3.10.0-3
>
I had a stupid typo in -3 causing ftbfs on 32bit archs, so make that -4.
Thanks,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 13:11 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:54:05PM +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> > I have another pending change that fixes a problem when nslcd would hang
> > under certain circumstances (using TLS and seeing a certain type of
> > network problem during a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package vinagre
This new upstream stable release only contains updated translations [1] and
no code changes. I also kept the packaging related changes to a minimum
a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Myself and Ludovico Cavedon are the new co-maintainers of the ntop package.
The current state of ntop in Debian is not good. Squeeze is about to
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 08:36 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 22:39:29 +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
Dear Julien,
> > I finally got an answer and small patch (attached) from upstream Re this
> > issue. Shall I prepare jblas 1.1.1-2 that includes this patch?
> >
> Yes.
jbl
36 matches
Mail list logo
