Dear stable release managers,
Please approve the upload of libjavascript-perl/1.08-1+lenny1 to
stable.
libjavascript-perl (1.08-1+lenny1) stable; urgency=low
* Steal fix_context_destruction.patch from upstream SVN. Fixes a segfault
after calling non-present function. Closes: 564772
* ad
On 2010-02-09 23:39 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 09:40:22PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:27:06PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>> >
>> > jpeg8 is now in testing and libterralib and sdop has been fixed already,
>> > so I would like to start th
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:53:17AM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-02-09 23:39 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 09:40:22PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:27:06PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> >> >
> >> > jpeg8 is now in testing and lib
Bill Allombert wrote, Tue, 9 Feb 2010 23:39:49 +0100
Please trigger binNMU for the following packages that build-depends on
libjpeg-dev (and not libjpeg62-dev|libjpeg-dev) for rebuilding against
libjpeg8-dev 8-2:
From a quick look:
kwwidgets 1.0.0~cvs20090825-4
Recent binNMU FTBFS on mip
On 2010-02-10, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Bill Allombert wrote, Tue, 9 Feb 2010 23:39:49 +0100
>> Please trigger binNMU for the following packages that build-depends on
>> libjpeg-dev (and not libjpeg62-dev|libjpeg-dev) for rebuilding against
>> libjpeg8-dev 8-2:
>
>>From a quick look:
>
>> kwwidget
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:12:08AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Are any of these packages actually buildable now? For instance,
>
> This is a good question. Please postpone the binNMU.
Also, it appears my list was truncated.
> I will report the full list of packages that are actually builda
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 555325 -1
Bug#555325: gq: version 1.3.4 completely unusable
Bug 555325 cloned as bug 569163.
> severity -1 normal
Bug #569163 [gq] gq: version 1.3.4 completely unusable
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> reassign -1 release.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 569163 RM: gq/testing; orphaned, broken upstream release
Bug #569163 [release.debian.org] gq: version 1.3.4 completely unusable
Changed Bug title to 'RM: gq/testing; orphaned, broken upstream release' from
'gq: version 1.3.4 completely un
Subject: nmu: fatrat_1.1.1-5
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: normal
nmu fatrat_1.1.1-5 . ALL . -m "rebuild with new gloox"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'),
[ reporting relevant info to the appropriate release.d.o bug report,
sorry for the not-so-handy cloning ]
> After a few crashes the first minutes I threw away all ~/.gq* files and
> directories. I tried to add a new server. Impossible to enter the bind
> dn. It simply forgets it. On the first se
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:06:16 -0600
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Subject: nmu: fatrat_1.1.1-5
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> Severity: normal
>
> nmu fatrat_1.1.1-5 . ALL . -m "rebuild with new gloox"
Hi,
this binnmu would cause a FTB
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 04:42:37PM +0100, Cristian Greco wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:06:16 -0600
> Kumar Appaiah wrote:
>
> > Subject: nmu: fatrat_1.1.1-5
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: binnmu
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > nmu fa
Your message dated Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:42:33 +
with message-id
<1265830953.14608.390.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#569168: Please rebuild fatrat against new gloox
has caused the Debian Bug report #569168,
regarding Please rebuild fatrat against new gloox
Your message dated Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:42:14 +
with message-id
<1265830935.14608.381.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#569163: Bug#555325: gq: version 1.3.4 completely
unusable
has caused the Debian Bug report #569163,
regarding RM: gq/testing; orphaned, br
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 03:04 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 17:14:57 -0800, Lei Zhang wrote:
>
> > There's a race condition in libXext that causes apps that use the X shared
> > memory extensions to occasionally crash. [1][2] This has been fixed upstream
> > with a small pat
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 11:13 +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> Dear stable release managers,
>
> Please approve the upload of libjavascript-perl/1.08-1+lenny1 to
> stable.
>
> libjavascript-perl (1.08-1+lenny1) stable; urgency=low
>
> * Steal fix_context_destruction.patch from upstream SVN. Fixes
-=| Adam D. Barratt, Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 07:57:57PM + |=-
> On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 11:13 +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> > Please approve the upload of libjavascript-perl/1.08-1+lenny1 to
> > stable.
> >
> > libjavascript-perl (1.08-1+lenny1) stable; urgency=low
> >
> > * Steal fix_context_d
Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 09:40:22PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:27:06PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>>> jpeg8 is now in testing and libterralib and sdop has been fixed already,
>>> so I would like to start the transition by uploading a version
Please unblock mdadm 3.1.1-1 and let it enter testing. My goal is to
then move the experimental package to unstable and try to get it
ready for squeeze too. The incremental assembly stuff is
off-by-default.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft Related projects:
: :' : proud Debian developer
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:45:50PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 09:40:22PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:27:06PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> >>> jpeg8 is now in testing and libterralib and sdop has been fixed already,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 23:08:41 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> It is API compatible. As I said, I have rebuilt locally the 311 packages
> that build-depends on libjpeg62-dev against libjpeg8-dev, so there is no
> risk of API incompatibility.
>
Then they shouldn't have different names.
Cheers,
J
* martin f krafft [2010-02-11 11:06]:
> Please unblock mdadm 3.1.1-1 and let it enter testing. My goal is to
> then move the experimental package to unstable and try to get it
> ready for squeeze too. The incremental assembly stuff is
> off-by-default.
Please don't unblock it yet. I ran into a (
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 23:08:41 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
>> It is API compatible. As I said, I have rebuilt locally the 311 packages
>> that build-depends on libjpeg62-dev against libjpeg8-dev, so there is no
>> risk of API incompatibility.
>>
> Then they shouldn't h
Processing changes file: libapache-dbi-perl_1.07-1+lenny1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libjavascript-perl_1.08-1+lenny1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
24 matches
Mail list logo
