On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:45:50PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Bill Allombert wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 09:40:22PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:27:06PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > >>> jpeg8 is now in testing and libterralib and sdop has been fixed already, > >>> so I would like to start the transition by uploading a version of > >>> libjpeg8-dev that provides libjpeg-dev. > >> Accordingly, and unless directed otherwise, I will upload a version of > >> libjpeg8-dev that provides libjpeg-dev on Sunday. > > > > Done in version libjpeg8-dev 8-2. > > What's the reason there is a conflict? Are they having common files or > do you just want them to not be coinstallable?
Both libjpeg8-dev and libjpeg62-dev contains the same filenames, with different content (e.g. /usr/lib/libjpeg.a) > Is libjpeg8-dev really API incompatible or is it just nice to have > another name? It is API compatible. As I said, I have rebuilt locally the 311 packages that build-depends on libjpeg62-dev against libjpeg8-dev, so there is no risk of API incompatibility. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
