Upstream version freeze for Debian

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Basically it looks ok. What about the freeze period for the toolchain? I > think we usually suffer for a too early freeze of the glibc (it has been > frozen in July for Etch, even if it has been unblocked a lot of time > after). In my opinion, it would b

Re: Upstream version freeze for Debian

* Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070413 09:02]: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Basically it looks ok. What about the freeze period for the toolchain? I > > think we usually suffer for a too early freeze of the glibc (it has been > > frozen in July for Etch, even if it has be

Re: texlive plans for the lenny cycle

Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Our current, very rough plans would mean a release in 18 months with some >> padding in both directions, which would lead to a lenny release around >> October 2008. We expect to shuffle this a bit around to fit everyone's >> needs, so please tell us

Re: libgksu update request for etch

Hi Jordi, On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 03:05:19 +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote: > I've noticed libgksu 2.0.3-9 unfortunately didn't make it in etch, even > if the latest changes were only translation updates. > > The package now has transitioned to lenny; I wonder if these kind of > updates are still appr

Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Xfce plans for the lenny cycle

On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 10:14:33PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > The release team is currently working on a schedule for the lenny > release cycle. For that, we want to gather some data from the bigger > software packaging teams in Debian first. > Our current, very rough plans would mean

mutt/1.5.13-3 for etch r1?

Hi, I would like to upload the mutt version now in unstable (1.5.13-3) to etch. The only change [*] is a fix pulled from upstream that resolves a bug that prevents mutt from successfully re-logging into an imap connection that has timed out (e.g. while the user was editing a mail). The current ver

Hints for packages with udebs

Please hint the following packages that are blocked from migrating to testing because they van a udeb: unblock dhcp3/3.0.4-14 unblock discover1/1.7.20 unblock discover-data/2.2007.03.22 unblock libusb/2:0.1.12-6 unblock nano/2.0.3-1 unblock openssl/0.9.8e-4 unblock thaifonts-scalable/1:0.4.5-3 un

Re: Hints for packages with udebs

On Friday 13 April 2007 14:18, Frans Pop wrote: > I could not check if those packages may be blocked from migrating for > other reasons because p.qa.d.o is currently unreachable. Correction: it was a problem on my side; AFAICT all packages should be OK to migrate. pgpLIfcmiu0Jr.pgp Description:

m68k and lenny

It appears that m68k has been dropped from the testing suite. What do we need to do to get back in and release with lenny? Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: m68k and lenny

Hi, On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:41:55 -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > It appears that m68k has been dropped from the testing suite. What do we > need to do to get back in and release with lenny? requalify? Martin -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life No manual entry for real-life --

Re: m68k and lenny

On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:43:53PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:41:55 -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > It appears that m68k has been dropped from the testing suite. What do we > > need to do to get back in and release with lenny? > > requalify? And the

Re: m68k and lenny

Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:43:53PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:41:55 -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > It appears that m68k has been dropped from the testing suite. What do we > > > need to do to get back in and release

Re: m68k and lenny

Stephen R Marenka a écrit : > It appears that m68k has been dropped from the testing suite. What do we > need to do to get back in and release with lenny? > Some people working on the glibc to add TLS support? -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian develope

Re: m68k and lenny

On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 08:07:09AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:43:53PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:41:55 -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > It appears that m68k has been dropped from the testing suite. What do we >

Re: Bug#400879: libapache-mod-auth-mysql still missing in etch

Version: 4.3.9-3 At 1176335641 time_t, Michael Loftis wrote: > This package is still MIA in etch 4.0r0... > > I can't seem to find a reason why? I think it's because the bug was not closed in the 4.3.9-3 changelog and nobody looked at. Closing it right now. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debi

Re: m68k and lenny

On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:43:53PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:41:55 -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > It appears that m68k has been dropped from the testing suite. What do we > > > need to do to get back in and

Re: m68k and lenny

On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:15:05PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:43:53PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:41:55 -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > > It appears that m68k has been dropped fro

Re: m68k and lenny

On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:33:08PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 08:07:09AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:43:53PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:41:55 -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > >

Re: Linux plans for the lenny cycle

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > The release team is currently working on a schedule for the lenny > release cycle. For that, we want to gather some data from the bigger > software packaging teams in Debian first. > > We would like to know which major upstream versions of linu

[etch] initramfs-tools 0.85h

prepared an updated initramfs-tools for etch that fixes important sparc boot fix #418977. dannf was so kind to review the diff and ok it for stable upload. http://git.debian.org/?p=kernel/initramfs-tools.git;a=commitdiff;h=7849de4db161a40ba2b941e1716b98f046f4c5bb;hp=17c940e3d4b0d36b4f4fa9aa7a92372d

Re: [etch] initramfs-tools 0.85h

On Friday 13 April 2007 17:22, maximilian attems wrote: > prepared an updated initramfs-tools for etch that fixes > important sparc boot fix #418977. > dannf was so kind to review the diff and ok it for stable upload. > http://git.debian.org/?p=kernel/initramfs-tools.git;a=commitdiff;h=7849 >de4db1

binNMU for libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl

Could you schedule a binNMU for libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl to pick up the new Cyrus SASL libraries? Thanks! -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR

Re: [etch] initramfs-tools 0.85h

On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 06:02:53PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > Note that this issue is already covered in the Release Notes for both > sparc and hppa: > http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/sparc/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#s-missingdrivers > http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/hppa/re

Re: Linux plans for the lenny cycle

On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:20:28PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > > > The release team is currently working on a schedule for the lenny > > release cycle. For that, we want to gather some data from the bigger > > software packaging teams in D

Re: [etch] initramfs-tools 0.85h

On Friday 13 April 2007 18:11, maximilian attems wrote: > > I'm not sure that this version will even solve the issue as the > > kernel/udev are currently just unable to load modules for devices on > > a sparc sbus and HP bus. > > afair davem fixed that for sparc, irc that was one arg for 2.6.18 We

Re: m68k and lenny

Stephen R Marenka writes: > Does anyone see any other toolchain issues (or other issues) besides > TLS in libc? the m68k related patches in gcc-4.2 need to be updated, test results for gcc-snapshot be submitted. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Re: [etch] initramfs-tools 0.85h

On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 06:40:02PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Friday 13 April 2007 18:11, maximilian attems wrote: > > > I'm not sure that this version will even solve the issue as the > > > kernel/udev are currently just unable to load modules for devices on > > > a sparc sbus and HP bus. > > >

Re: m68k and lenny

* Stephen R Marenka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070413 14:38]: > It appears that m68k has been dropped from the testing suite. What do we > need to do to get back in and release with lenny? That are two different questions obviously. :) 1. To get back to testing: Basically, the release team didn't mind

Re: gcc plans for the lenny cycle

Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We would like to know which major upstream versions of gcc are > expected to be released in the next 24 months and how much time you > expect them to need to get stable enough for a Debian stable release. gcc 4.2.0 will be released Real Soon No

Re: gcc plans for the lenny cycle

* Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-13 19:42]: > gcc 4.2.0 will be released Real Soon Now (next few months). Changes > are not very disruptive, I suppose not very many packages will fail > to build. It will probably stabilize within a few months. FWIW, I've been keeping track of 4.2 relat

Re: glibc plans for the lenny cycle

* Aurelien Jarno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070412 22:59]: > Basically it looks ok. What about the freeze period for the toolchain? I > think we usually suffer for a too early freeze of the glibc (it has been > frozen in July for Etch, even if it has been unblocked a lot of time > after). In my opinion,