On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 03:41:49PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Ian Beckwith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041013 15:35]:
> > As nothing has been uploaded to non-US/non-free since before the
> > compromise, I suspect it hasn't been reenabled yet.
> Exactly. But we need to update non-US before release of
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 03:54:33PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 02:30:24PM +0100, Ian Beckwith wrote:
> > I suspect, since the crypto-in-main move, that crypto no longer needs
> > to live in non-US/non-free, and could move to non-free.
>
> No, this is not the case.
>
>
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 02:30:24PM +0100, Ian Beckwith wrote:
> I suspect, since the crypto-in-main move, that crypto no longer needs
> to live in non-US/non-free, and could move to non-free.
No, this is not the case.
The expert restrictions which prompted the non-US archive still exist,
they hav
* Ian Beckwith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041013 15:35]:
> As nothing has been uploaded to non-US/non-free since before the
> compromise, I suspect it hasn't been reenabled yet.
Exactly. But we need to update non-US before release of sarge.
> I suspect, since the crypto-in-main move, that crypto no lo
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 03:07:24PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> I can imagine that there are more candidates than the ones in
> non-US/non-free now.
Indeed. I maintain ckermit, and would like to enable the crypto
options, which would mean a move to non-US/non-free.
> A while ago, I offered to
* Martin Schulze:
> Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Andreas Barth:
>>
>> > So, the only thing left now is pgp5i in non-US/non-free (and AFAICS this
>> > can't go to non-free).
>>
>> What's the security patching status of pgp5i?
>
> What are you referring to?
I've checked in the meantime. The RNG is
Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Andreas Barth:
>
> > So, the only thing left now is pgp5i in non-US/non-free (and AFAICS this
> > can't go to non-free).
>
> What's the security patching status of pgp5i?
What are you referring to?
Regards,
Joey
--
The good thing about standards is that ther
* Andreas Barth:
> So, the only thing left now is pgp5i in non-US/non-free (and AFAICS this
> can't go to non-free).
What's the security patching status of pgp5i?
* Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041008 17:00]:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 10:12:24AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040928 18:36]:
> > > The only package in non-US/main left over is vtun. I spoke with the
> > > maintainer, and he wants to do a new upload
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 10:12:24AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040928 18:36]:
> > The only package in non-US/main left over is vtun. I spoke with the
> > maintainer, and he wants to do a new upload as soon as the new release
> > of vtun happens. I specifically
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040928 18:36]:
> The only package in non-US/main left over is vtun. I spoke with the
> maintainer, and he wants to do a new upload as soon as the new release
> of vtun happens. I specifically asked him to upload his package to main
> ASAP if this is ok from the
* Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040928 20:40]:
> On Tuesday, 28 Sep 2004, you wrote:
> > The only package in non-free left over is pgp5i; it is orphaned, but
> > somebody wants to adopt it and has already made packages (quite
> > recently). See http://bugs.debian.org/237370 for details.
>
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28 Sep 2004, you wrote:
> > The only package in non-free left over is pgp5i; it is orphaned, but
> > somebody wants to adopt it and has already made packages (quite
> > recently). See http://bugs.debian.org/237370 for details.
>
> > non-free
> >
>
Hi Andreas,
On Tuesday, 28 Sep 2004, you wrote:
> The only package in non-free left over is pgp5i; it is orphaned, but
> somebody wants to adopt it and has already made packages (quite
> recently). See http://bugs.debian.org/237370 for details.
> non-free
>
> Package: pgp5i
> ITA, #2373
Hi,
I did some analysis of the packages in non-US. Short summary: Only two
are left over, but both have an interessted maintainer. One of them
could be moved to main, the other is in non-US/non-free, and needs to
stay there.
The only package in non-US/main left over is vtun. I spoke with the
main
On 2004-06-26 Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 08:01:16AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> > 15 soon. links-ssl will be replaced by a dummy-package depending on
> > elinks if the ftp-master's approve the respective upload.[1]
> I found no footnote [1] in y
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 08:01:16AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2004-06-23 Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since sarge will release with "crypto in main", what is the current
> > status of the remaining packages in non-US? Can't all packages be
> > migrated into main so sarg
On 2004-06-23 Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since sarge will release with "crypto in main", what is the current
> status of the remaining packages in non-US? Can't all packages be
> migrated into main so sarge can release without non-US?
> According to the Sources.gz files on non
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 12:50:05AM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Since sarge will release with "crypto in main", what is the current
> status of the remaining packages in non-US? Can't all packages be
> migrated into main so sarge can release without non-US?
>
> According to the Sources.gz f
Hi,
Since sarge will release with "crypto in main", what is the current
status of the remaining packages in non-US? Can't all packages be
migrated into main so sarge can release without non-US?
According to the Sources.gz files on non-us.debian.org we have 16
source packages left in non-us/main
20 matches
Mail list logo
