On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 05:27:46PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 05:07:59PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Rene Engelhard (r...@debian.org) [090827 16:44]:
> > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 09:05:19PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> > > > I have uploaded ICU 4.2.1 to unstable
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 05:07:59PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Rene Engelhard (r...@debian.org) [090827 16:44]:
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 09:05:19PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> > > I have uploaded ICU 4.2.1 to unstable. Once it builds, it should be
> > > possible to initiate rebuilds of i
* Rene Engelhard (r...@debian.org) [090827 16:44]:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 09:05:19PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> > I have uploaded ICU 4.2.1 to unstable. Once it builds, it should be
> > possible to initiate rebuilds of its reverse dependencies. Thanks.
>
> That said, it built everytwhere
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 09:05:19PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> I have uploaded ICU 4.2.1 to unstable. Once it builds, it should be
> possible to initiate rebuilds of its reverse dependencies. Thanks.
That said, it built everytwhere since some days:
libicu42 |4.2.1-2 | unstable | a
I have uploaded ICU 4.2.1 to unstable. Once it builds, it should be
possible to initiate rebuilds of its reverse dependencies. Thanks.
--
Jay Berkenbilt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.de
Luk Claes wrote:
> Please upload now.
Great, glad we're ready. However, I'm getting ready to be gone without
email access for a week, and I have an RC bugfix in ICU 4.0.1 unstable
waiting to transition. I wouldn't want to introduce a new problem while
I'm not here to deal with it or possibly l
Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 11:17:35AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>> Thank you for the response. I will hold off. Should I check in again
>> in a few weeks, or is there something specific I should be monitoring
>> before I check in again? If there is a specific package or gro
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 11:17:35AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Thank you for the response. I will hold off. Should I check in again
> in a few weeks, or is there something specific I should be monitoring
> before I check in again? If there is a specific package or group of
> packages that sho
Philipp Kern wrote:
>> It's now been a full month since my first message about scheduling an
>> ICU 4.2 transition, and I have still not done an upload to unstable
>> because I am still waiting for a response. Again, with the utmost
>> respect and admiration for the hard work being done by the r
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 09:37:20AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> It's now been a full month since my first message about scheduling an
> ICU 4.2 transition, and I have still not done an upload to unstable
> because I am still waiting for a response. Again, with the utmost
> respect and admiration
It's now been a full month since my first message about scheduling an
ICU 4.2 transition, and I have still not done an upload to unstable
because I am still waiting for a response. Again, with the utmost
respect and admiration for the hard work being done by the release team,
I think the new poli
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>> permission to upload ICU 4.2.1 to unstable. I understand and fully
>> support the new policy of getting advance permission and trying to
>> coordinate transitions, but I'm unsure of how long I should expect to
>> wait before receiving a re
Hi,
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> permission to upload ICU 4.2.1 to unstable. I understand and fully
> support the new policy of getting advance permission and trying to
> coordinate transitions, but I'm unsure of how long I should expect to
> wait before receiving a response one way or the other.
I a
I sent the message below to debian-release 11 days ago requesting
permission to upload ICU 4.2.1 to unstable. I understand and fully
support the new policy of getting advance permission and trying to
coordinate transitions, but I'm unsure of how long I should expect to
wait before receiving a res
I'd like to get a place in line for doing a transition to ICU 4.2. I
realize there are other transitions going on right now, but I'd be
interested in an ETA. I believe the ICU 4.0 transition worked just with
binary NMUs, but I also seem to recall that it was forced into testing
early. Also, ope
15 matches
Mail list logo
