Re: freeze and testing and libgcc1 (Re: proposing bash-3.0 upload to unstable

2004-07-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 01:32:06AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > > * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-27 23:31]: > > > > If you feel it only justifies an urgency=medium upload, then that's > > > > what I would recommend. This means

Re: freeze and testing and libgcc1 (Re: proposing bash-3.0 upload to unstable

2004-07-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-27 23:31]: > > > If you feel it only justifies an urgency=medium upload, then that's > > > what I would recommend. This means it probably won't make

freeze and testing and libgcc1 (Re: proposing bash-3.0 upload to unstable

2004-07-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-27 23:31]: > > If you feel it only justifies an urgency=medium upload, then that's > > what I would recommend. This means it probably won't make the > > freeze, since medium is 5 days and the 31st is 4 days from now, but

Re: proposing bash-3.0 upload to unstable

2004-07-28 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 12:11:35PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-27 23:31]: > > If you feel it only justifies an urgency=medium upload, then that's > > what I would recommend. This means it probably won't make the > > freeze, since medium is 5 days

Re: proposing bash-3.0 upload to unstable

2004-07-28 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-27 23:31]: > If you feel it only justifies an urgency=medium upload, then that's > what I would recommend. This means it probably won't make the > freeze, since medium is 5 days and the 31st is 4 days from now, but > those are the breaks. I think the

Re: proposing bash-3.0 upload to unstable

2004-07-28 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 06:51:54AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Steve Langasek writes: > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 10:34:38PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > I know, frozen for base packages, but fixing about 45 reports with > > > this release. Packages at http://people.debian.org/~doko/bash/.

Re: proposing bash-3.0 upload to unstable

2004-07-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Steve Langasek writes: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 10:34:38PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > I know, frozen for base packages, but fixing about 45 reports with > > this release. Packages at http://people.debian.org/~doko/bash/. > > The fixed bugs are marked in the BTS. > > Do you believe the fixed

Re: proposing bash-3.0 upload to unstable

2004-07-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 10:34:38PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > I know, frozen for base packages, but fixing about 45 reports with > this release. Packages at http://people.debian.org/~doko/bash/. > The fixed bugs are marked in the BTS. Do you believe the fixed bugs are important enough, and the

proposing bash-3.0 upload to unstable

2004-07-27 Thread Matthias Klose
I know, frozen for base packages, but fixing about 45 reports with this release. Packages at http://people.debian.org/~doko/bash/. The fixed bugs are marked in the BTS. Matthias