Re: mips64el in testing

2016-06-13 Thread Niels Thykier
Aurelien Jarno: > [...] > > Here is the current buildd lists and how there are configured: > - eberlin (DSAed): mipsel then mips64el > - mipsel-aql-01 (DSAed): mipsel then mips64el > - mipsel-aql-02 (DSAed): mipsel then mips64el > - mipsel-aql-03 (DSAed): mips64el then mipsel > - mipsel-manda-01 (

Re: mips64el in testing

2016-06-10 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2016-06-05 20:43, Niels Thykier wrote: > YunQiang Su: > > On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > >> * DSA maintained buildds (admittedly, I did not look for one). > > > > mips64el shares the same machines with mipsel. > > All machines for mipsel can be configured to build for

Re: mips64el in testing

2016-06-05 Thread Andreas Barth
* Niels Thykier (ni...@thykier.net) [160605 22:45]: > In other words, there is a DSA buildd? > > I notice we have the following list of mipsel/mips64el buildds: > > * mips64el: eberlin, mipsel-aql-01, mipsel-aql-02, mipsel-manda-01, >mipsel-manda-02 >- I presume none of them are DSA give

Re: mips64el in testing

2016-06-05 Thread Niels Thykier
YunQiang Su: > On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: >> [...] >> AFAICT, we are still missing: >> >> * A rebuild of the last package [mipsel64import] > > This is a bug of gcc, and the gcc team in IMG is working on it. > It also effects lua. > Thanks for the update. :) >> * DSA

Re: mips64el in testing

2016-06-05 Thread YunQiang Su
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: >> On 06/03/16 01:21, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >>> [...] >> >> Please let us know when those issues get sorted out. >> >> Cheers, >> Emilio >> > > Hi, > > Just a friendly reminder that we have not heard from you on this to

Re: mips64el in testing

2016-06-05 Thread Niels Thykier
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: > On 06/03/16 01:21, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> [...] > > Please let us know when those issues get sorted out. > > Cheers, > Emilio > Hi, Just a friendly reminder that we have not heard from you on this topic. AFAICT, we are still missing: * A rebuild of the last packa

Re: mips64el in testing

2016-03-11 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 06/03/16 01:21, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On 2016-03-05 17:40, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Hi, Hi, So mips64el got into unstable on ftpmaster a while ago. I suppose you would like for it to get into testing and released with Stretch. Is that right? Yes, that is right. If so, db5.3 needs

Re: mips64el in testing

2016-03-05 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2016-03-05 17:40, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Hi, Hi, > So mips64el got into unstable on ftpmaster a while ago. I suppose you would > like > for it to get into testing and released with Stretch. Is that right? Yes, that is right. > If so, db5.3 needs to get built, as that's the last pac

mips64el in testing

2016-03-05 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi, So mips64el got into unstable on ftpmaster a while ago. I suppose you would like for it to get into testing and released with Stretch. Is that right? If so, db5.3 needs to get built, as that's the last package that got imported and hasn't been rebuilt since: https://ftp-master.debian.org/use