On 2016-06-05 20:43, Niels Thykier wrote: > YunQiang Su: > > On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> wrote: > >> * DSA maintained buildds (admittedly, I did not look for one). > > > > mips64el shares the same machines with mipsel. > > All machines for mipsel can be configured to build for mips64el at the > > same time. > > > > [...] > > In other words, there is a DSA buildd? > > I notice we have the following list of mipsel/mips64el buildds: > > * mips64el: eberlin, mipsel-aql-01, mipsel-aql-02, mipsel-manda-01, > mipsel-manda-02 > - I presume none of them are DSA given mips64el currently has a note > of not having a DSA buildd. > > * mipsel: mayer, eysler, rem, phrixos (non-DSA), helle (non-DSA) > > Are these lists up to date? If so, we only seem to have 4 DSA buildds
Here is the current buildd lists and how there are configured: - eberlin (DSAed): mipsel then mips64el - mipsel-aql-01 (DSAed): mipsel then mips64el - mipsel-aql-02 (DSAed): mipsel then mips64el - mipsel-aql-03 (DSAed): mips64el then mipsel - mipsel-manda-01 (DSAed): mipsel then mips64el - mipsel-manda-01 (DSAed): mipsel then mips64el - clash (manually signed): mips64el - lm6100 (manually signed): mips64el - thor (manually signed): mips64el In short only one DSAed buildd builds mips64el before mipsel. This is clearly not enough for the port. > to be shared between mipsel and mips64el. Are some of these being > migrated to/replaced with DSA buildds? 2 buildds have arrived at man-da and 2 at sil. They need to be racked and installed. They will be split between mips (they have an FPU) and mipsel/mips64el, likely 1 mips and 1 mipsel in each location, but it's not fully decided yet. Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
