* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050312 14:30]:
> [The unofficial list at http://people.debian.org/~aba/sarge.html
> doesn't show any release updates since September, so I'm unable to
> evaluate which things are on "the list of things that need to happen"
> and which are not.]
Thanks
On Saturday 12 March 2005 15:00, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It's not something to delay the release over, so it's not relevant on
> > -release atm, especially since -release can't do anything about it.
> > -release is *not* a discussion list.
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's not something to delay the release over, so it's not relevant on
> -release atm, especially since -release can't do anything about it.
> -release is *not* a discussion list. Do you really think it's useful to
> complain about ftp-master team
[m-f-t -devel, since this is already offtopic on -release]
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 05:27:38AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> [The unofficial list at http://people.debian.org/~aba/sarge.html
> doesn't show any release updates since September, so I'm unable to
> evaluate which things are on "
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Be patient, and fix some RC bugs. It's a BSP this weekend. Lush hasn't
> ever been in stable, and isn't in testing at the moment, so it's a new
> package.
Actually, in point of fact, the reason the relevant bug was filed
against ftp.debian.org
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 03:04:47AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> So we are waiting on the ftp team. It's been over a hundred days, and
> nothing has happened. It seems extremely likely to me that the bug
> report has been forgotten. Yet, I've been told that pestering people
> is not the ri
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> According to http://buildd.debian.org/quinn-diff/Packages-arch-specific, the
> package is not supposed to be tried on ia64:
>
> %lush: !ia64
> #ANAIS, #267494
>
> This package is merely w
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 11:10:55AM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> On Saturday 12 March 2005 05:02, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Please see bug 267494. Lush (a QA package) should get into testing.
> > It needs to get into testing. What is necessary, beyond a 201 day old
> > bug report, to have it
On Saturday 12 March 2005 05:02, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Please see bug 267494. Lush (a QA package) should get into testing.
> It needs to get into testing. What is necessary, beyond a 201 day old
> bug report, to have it in testing?
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=lush
| lu
Please see bug 267494. Lush (a QA package) should get into testing.
It needs to get into testing. What is necessary, beyond a 201 day old
bug report, to have it in testing?
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
10 matches
Mail list logo
