On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 11:10:55AM +0100, David Schmitt wrote: > On Saturday 12 March 2005 05:02, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > Please see bug 267494. Lush (a QA package) should get into testing. > > It needs to get into testing. What is necessary, beyond a 201 day old > > bug report, to have it in testing?
> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=lush > | lush is not yet built on ia64: 1.0+cvs.2004.02.02 vs 1.0+final-1 (missing 1 > binary: lush) > Following to http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=ia64&pkg=lush > The last build seems to have failed: > |/build/buildd/lush-1.0+cvs.2004.05.16/debian/lush/usr/bin/lush @sysenv > stdenv > -- > /build/buildd/lush-1.0+cvs.2004.05.16/debian/lush/usr/share/lush/sys/stdenv.dump > | > | **** GASP: Severe error : Signal 7 has occurred > |**** GASP: Tue Aug 31 15:05:20 2004 > | > |Lush Fatal Error: gasp handler > |make[1]: *** [install-dump] Error 2 > |make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/lush-1.0+cvs.2004.05.16' > |make: *** [install] Error 2 > | > ****************************************************************************** > |Build finished at 20040831-1605 > |FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] > Signal 7 is SIGBUS btw. > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&exact=1&keywords=lush > shows: > |unstable: > |1.0+final-1: alpha arm hppa i386 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc > |1.0+cvs.2004.02.02: ia64 > To get lush into testing, it'd need a successful build of 1.0+final-1 on ia64. > Could someone please explain why there are no tries to build lush after > 1.0+cvs.2004.05.16? According to http://buildd.debian.org/quinn-diff/Packages-arch-specific, the package is not supposed to be tried on ia64: %lush: !ia64 #ANAIS, #267494 This package is merely waiting for someone on the ftp team to remove the existing ia64 binaries. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
