Re: long term solution for flashplugin-nonfree in stable

2007-12-31 Thread Luk Claes
Landry MINOZA wrote: > Le Monday 31 December 2007 14:48:22 Rainer Dorsch, vous avez écrit : >> Am Donnerstag, 20. Dezember 2007 schrieb Bart Martens: >>> I'm not convinced that the typical updates of flashplugin-nonfree should >>> go via volatile. Updating flashplugin-nonfree from 9.0.48.0.* to >>

Re: long term solution for flashplugin-nonfree in stable

2007-12-31 Thread Landry MINOZA
Le Monday 31 December 2007 14:48:22 Rainer Dorsch, vous avez écrit : > Am Donnerstag, 20. Dezember 2007 schrieb Bart Martens: > > I'm not convinced that the typical updates of flashplugin-nonfree should > > go via volatile.  Updating flashplugin-nonfree from 9.0.48.0.* to > > 9.0.115.0.* involves a

Re: long term solution for flashplugin-nonfree in stable

2007-12-31 Thread Rainer Dorsch
Am Donnerstag, 20. Dezember 2007 schrieb Bart Martens: > I'm not convinced that the typical updates of flashplugin-nonfree should > go via volatile.  Updating flashplugin-nonfree from 9.0.48.0.* to > 9.0.115.0.* involves a new release of closed source software, so it can > include surprises that ar

Re: long term solution for flashplugin-nonfree in stable

2007-12-27 Thread Philippe Cloutier
Le December 20, 2007 12:20:38 pm Philippe Cloutier, vous avez écrit : > Le December 20, 2007 06:02:26 am Bart Martens, vous avez écrit : > > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 23:34 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > > > Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 19 December 2007 12:06, Holger Levsen wrote: > > > >> Hi

Re: Re: long term solution for flashplugin-nonfree in stable

2007-12-27 Thread Hideki Yamane
> > The approach that is, in my opinion, closest to reality, is to maintain > > flashplugin-nonfree in unstable, allow it to enter testing, keep > > flashplugin-nonfree out of stable and oldstable, and maintain a working > > package of flashplugin-nonfree for Debian stable at backports.org . > > Th

Re: long term solution for flashplugin-nonfree in stable

2007-12-22 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Bart Martens wrote: > The approach that is, in my opinion, closest to reality, is to maintain > flashplugin-nonfree in unstable, allow it to enter testing, keep > flashplugin-nonfree out of stable and oldstable, and maintain a working > package of flashplugin-nonfree for Debian stable at backports.

Re: long term solution for flashplugin-nonfree in stable

2007-12-20 Thread Luk Claes
Bart Martens wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 23:34 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: >> Scott Kitterman wrote: >>> On Wednesday 19 December 2007 12:06, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, I would like to know what the stable release managers plan to do regarding flashplugin-nonfree in etch.

Re: long term solution for flashplugin-nonfree in stable

2007-12-20 Thread Philippe Cloutier
Le December 20, 2007 06:02:26 am Bart Martens, vous avez écrit : > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 23:34 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > > Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > On Wednesday 19 December 2007 12:06, Holger Levsen wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I would like to know what the stable release managers plan to do

long term solution for flashplugin-nonfree in stable

2007-12-20 Thread Bart Martens
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 23:34 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Scott Kitterman wrote: > > On Wednesday 19 December 2007 12:06, Holger Levsen wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I would like to know what the stable release managers plan to do regarding > >> flashplugin-nonfree in etch. > >> > >> As I see it, there are