> > The approach that is, in my opinion, closest to reality, is to maintain > > flashplugin-nonfree in unstable, allow it to enter testing, keep > > flashplugin-nonfree out of stable and oldstable, and maintain a working > > package of flashplugin-nonfree for Debian stable at backports.org . > > Then users of Debian stable can edit their sources.list once and then > > forget about flashplugin-nonfree. > > That appears the least worst option.
I agree, and I think most of "Users" don't know how to edit their sources.list... > IMO we should concentrate on gnash and remove flashplugin-nonfree > from the archive. We still have 6 months before a freeze, so it can be > hopefully brought in shape by then. I don't want to remove flashplugin-nonfree, because many webpages that uses flash check its versions with javascript or/and actionscript. Can we deal with this with gnash? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
