On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 17:15 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 29 décembre 2006 à 10:48 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG a
> écrit :
> > Despite what Josselin has said, I can see no indication from a brief
> > perusal of the upstream branch sources in trac that upstream gnucash
> > either no lo
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le vendredi 29 décembre 2006 à 10:48 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
>> 1) Decide that glib should not migrate into testing (it is a freeze,
>> after all); if there are particular fixes of RC issues in more recent
>> versions, then those fixes sho
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 12:56 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 08:11:14PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>>> I miss an analysis of what other packages are involved in this plan. If
>>> only GnuCash is involved that'd make the lower ra
Le vendredi 29 décembre 2006 à 10:48 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG a
écrit :
> Despite what Josselin has said, I can see no indication from a brief
> perusal of the upstream branch sources in trac that upstream gnucash
> either no longer uses these key files or has changed away from the keys
> with em
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 12:56 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 08:11:14PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Friday 29 December 2006 19:48, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > Note that option (3) depends on upstream's ability to fix the problem
> > > quickly, *and* is likely to be err
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 08:11:14PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 29 December 2006 19:48, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Note that option (3) depends on upstream's ability to fix the problem
> > quickly, *and* is likely to be error prone. If our priority is the
> > *release*, then options (1)
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 17:13 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>
>> Well, bugs are bugs and I don't think we should be too hard on this. I
>> think that changes that does change the library behaviour should be
>> avoided.
>
> The rules for a freeze ar
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 17:13 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
> Well, bugs are bugs and I don't think we should be too hard on this. I
> think that changes that does change the library behaviour should be
> avoided.
The rules for a freeze are that changes which fix release critical bugs
are transit
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 20:11 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 29 December 2006 19:48, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Note that option (3) depends on upstream's ability to fix the problem
> > quickly, *and* is likely to be error prone. If our priority is the
> > *release*, then options (1) and (2
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 17:02 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > 2) Decide that glib can migrate into testing, with the particular change
>> > of checking key values reverted to its pre-2.12.5 be
On Friday 29 December 2006 19:48, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Note that option (3) depends on upstream's ability to fix the problem
> quickly, *and* is likely to be error prone. If our priority is the
> *release*, then options (1) and (2) are the best choices.
I miss an analysis of what other pa
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 17:02 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 2) Decide that glib can migrate into testing, with the particular change
> > of checking key values reverted to its pre-2.12.5 behavior, since this
> > is a destabilizing change in the
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2) Decide that glib can migrate into testing, with the particular change
> of checking key values reverted to its pre-2.12.5 behavior, since this
> is a destabilizing change in the Debian context.
This looks to be the best option since it preserve
Despite what Josselin has said, I can see no indication from a brief
perusal of the upstream branch sources in trac that upstream gnucash
either no longer uses these key files or has changed away from the keys
with embedded spaces.
I have asked gnucash upstream for their thoughts on the long-term
14 matches
Mail list logo