Re: gaim and totem transition for testing.

2006-10-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:26:55PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > "Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I guess that gaim[0] and totem[1] transition for testing needs some love. > > The new gaim 2 beta is a valid candidate but makes 7 packages > > (extensions/plugins for gaim 1.

Re: gaim and totem transition for testing.

2006-10-31 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
"Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I guess that gaim[0] and totem[1] transition for testing needs some love. > > The new gaim 2 beta is a valid candidate but makes 7 packages > (extensions/plugins for gaim 1.x) uninstallable. I see no reason why these should be broken, so let's see wha

gaim and totem transition for testing.

2006-10-31 Thread Gustavo Franco
Hi, I guess that gaim[0] and totem[1] transition for testing needs some love. The new gaim 2 beta is a valid candidate but makes 7 packages (extensions/plugins for gaim 1.x) uninstallable. Totem wasn't building on arm, it seems to be a matter of rebuild attempt due to missing-depends that are a