On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:26:55PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > "Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I guess that gaim[0] and totem[1] transition for testing needs some love.
> > The new gaim 2 beta is a valid candidate but makes 7 packages > > (extensions/plugins for gaim 1.x) uninstallable. > I see no reason why these should be broken, so let's see what's needed > to get them too into testing: <snipped half of these packages, which are redundant comments about packages already being accepted by luk's hint> > * gaim-autoprofile needs to be rebuilt for the new gaim. > I have tried to rebuild it locally with the new gaim, that > didn't work. Seems to need manual intervention, could you look into > that? That's bug #396372. > * gaim-guifications needs to be built on arm and sparc, which failed > when trying to build the package the first time. > Steve, could you please requeue gaim-guifications_2.13~beta4-1 on arm, > sparc? Done. > * gaim-librvp_0.9.5-1 needs to be requeued on sparc, rest is fine Done. > * gaim-otr was missing on arm, but was built yesterday and only needs to > be uploaded. Yep. > > Totem wasn't building on arm, it seems to be a matter of rebuild > > attempt due to missing-depends that are already in place, no? > Yes, a simple requeue should be enough. Done. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
