On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>...
> > Where's a reason for the difference between the priorities `optional'
> > and `extra' if you can't be sure that a CD
> > excluding all `extra' packages but including all others gives you a Debian
> > with no missing dependencies?
>
> CDs are
Le Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 04:40:37PM +0200, Adrian Bunk écrivait:
> I would prefer Wichert's suggestion: to file one single bug report against
> ftp.debian.org .
There's already such bug reports filled against ftp.debian.org, but they
aren't RC and they don't need to be.
> Where's a reason for the
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 04:40:37PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Where's a reason for the difference between the priorities `optional'
> > and `extra' if you can't be sure that a CD
> > excluding all `extra' packages but including all others gives you
On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 04:40:37PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I would prefer Wichert's suggestion: to file one single bug report against
> ftp.debian.org .
That's going to be useless, since it will have no feedback or information
from the maintainers of the packages involved.
> Why don't you thi
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 12:28:08PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > The next thing I'm doing is filing RC bugs for priority problems (most
> > often: package with priority `optional' depends on package with priority
> > `extra').
>
> Please don't. Such
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Richard Braakman wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 12:28:08PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > The next thing I'm doing is filing RC bugs for priority problems (most
> > > often: package with priority `optional' depends on package
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 12:28:08PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > The next thing I'm doing is filing RC bugs for priority problems (most
> > often: package with priority `optional' depends on package with priority
> > `extra').
>
> Please don't. Such
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 12:28:08PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The next thing I'm doing is filing RC bugs for priority problems (most
> often: package with priority `optional' depends on package with priority
> `extra').
Please don't. Such bugs are not release-critical.
Richard Braakman
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 03:13:28PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > The next thing I'm doing is filing RC bugs for priority problems (most
> > often: package with priority `optional' depends on package with priority
> > `extra').
>
> Noo, please don't do that. File a *single* bugreport for ftp.d
On Mon, 24 Apr 2000, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The next thing I'm doing is filing RC bugs for priority problems (most
> often: package with priority `optional' depends on package with priority
> `extra').
If there is a consensus that we should not release potato with priority
bugs, I'll appreciate tha
Previously Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The next thing I'm doing is filing RC bugs for priority problems (most
> often: package with priority `optional' depends on package with priority
> `extra').
Noo, please don't do that. File a *single* bugreport for ftp.debian.org
to update the override file.
Wicher
On Sat, 22 Apr 2000, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> > And that RC bugs should be filed?
>
> I started filing RC bugs against unmet "Depends:" and "Recommends:"
> yesterday.
>...
I've done this (except for one strange case a bug was closed by a
new package but this package is in neither potato nor woo
12 matches
Mail list logo
