On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Richard Braakman wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 04:40:37PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Where's a reason for the difference between the priorities `optional' > > and `extra' if you can't be sure that a CD > > excluding all `extra' packages but including all others gives you a Debian > > with no missing dependencies? > > The primary reason for priorities was to help people decide which packages > they want. If you want to create custom CDs with special properties, feel > free. If you notice that it doesn't really work with potato, feel free > to fix it in woody.
Questions: What's the reason this has not been fixed in potato during the last months? What do you plan to do to release woody having a sane override file which fulfills policy requirements about priorities? Thanks.