It is a *serious policy violation*. I've been talking with the
ftpparse lists and it turns out that there is a replacement in the
program ftpcopy (search google). I haven't verified it though. Here's
my analysis of the problems:
* Commercial use requires contacting author (no specific DFSG
violatio
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 09:23:11AM +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> The latest sarge elinks still has the code
Which is exactly what I have said...
> On 5/21/05, Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Shouldn't this have been fixed by 0.10.4-1? This would leave the issue
> > open for s
The latest sarge elinks still has the code
Andrew
On 5/21/05, Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 06:13:01PM +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> > I have just submitted a serious bug against the elinks package.
> > (310035) It is to do with the fact that there is n
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 06:13:01PM +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> I have just submitted a serious bug against the elinks package.
> (310035) It is to do with the fact that there is nonfree code in it,
> the same code that was in prozilla. I'd like to know if any of the
> release team can send DJ
I have just submitted a serious bug against the elinks package.
(310035) It is to do with the fact that there is nonfree code in it,
the same code that was in prozilla. I'd like to know if any of the
release team can send DJ Bernstein (the code's author; author of
qmail) an official Debian team res
5 matches
Mail list logo
