On October 13, 2017 2:39:40 AM EDT, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
>
> or
>add mhap to build-depends to prevent canu from building on
>architectures where mhap isn't available.
>
I mean libssw (mhap being arch:all)
regards
Afif
On October 13, 2017 1:37:30 AM EDT, "Adam D. Barratt"
wrote:
>On Fri, 2017-10-13 at 00:39 -0400, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
>>
>> على الخميس 12 تشرين الأول 2017 01:48، كتب Adam D. Barratt:
>> Is it not possible to depend on it without incurring an RC
>> bug?
>
>Yes, trivially - by depending on it
On Fri, 2017-10-13 at 00:39 -0400, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
>
> على الخميس 12 تشرين الأول 2017 01:48، كتب Adam D. Barratt:
> > The britney log says:
> >
> > trying: canu
> > skipped: canu (0, 2975, 79)
> > got: 43+0: a-4:i-26:a-2:a-1:a-1:m-1:m-4:m-1:p-1:s-2
> > * arm64: canu
> >
> > Which
على الخميس 12 تشرين الأول 2017 01:48، كتب Adam D. Barratt:
> The britney log says:
>
> trying: canu
> skipped: canu (0, 2975, 79)
> got: 43+0: a-4:i-26:a-2:a-1:a-1:m-1:m-4:m-1:p-1:s-2
> * arm64: canu
>
> Which indicates that the binary package "canu" would be uninstallable
> on (at lea
On Thu, 2017-10-12 at 00:34 -0400, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
> Hi, release team,
>
> Do you know what the problem is here with canu? :
>
>
> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=canu
>
> ~~~
> Migration status: OK: Will attempt migration (Any information
> below
> is purely informational)
Hi, release team,
Do you know what the problem is here with canu? :
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=canu
~~~
Migration status: OK: Will attempt migration (Any information below
is purely informational)
39 days old (needed 5 days)
Piuparts tested OK - https://piuparts.debia
6 matches
Mail list logo
