On Thu, 2017-10-12 at 00:34 -0400, Afif Elghraoui wrote: > Hi, release team, > > Do you know what the problem is here with canu? : > > > https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=canu > > ~~~ > Migration status: OK: Will attempt migration (Any information > below > is purely informational) > 39 days old (needed 5 days) > Piuparts tested OK - https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/c/can > u.html > Valid candidate > ~~~ >
The britney log says: trying: canu skipped: canu (0, 2975, 79) got: 43+0: a-4:i-26:a-2:a-1:a-1:m-1:m-4:m-1:p-1:s-2 * arm64: canu Which indicates that the binary package "canu" would be uninstallable on (at least) arm64 were the package to migrate. A little investigation leads to this being due to the dependency on "mhap", which in turns depends on "libssw-java", and: libssw-java | 1.1-1+b1 | testing | amd64 libssw-java | 1.1-1+b1 | unstable | amd64, kfreebsd-amd64 This also means that your package has an unreported RC bug in unstable right now, as it cannot possibly be installable on any architectures other than amd64 and kfreebsd-amd64. Regards, Adam
