2010/5/20 Julien Cristau :
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 23:39:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
>> To clarify, by "these all" I meant the missing mumps builds. As neither
>> blacs-mpi nor scalapack depends on mumps, I've added a hint for those
>> two packages; let's see what happens in tomorrow morn
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 23:39:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> To clarify, by "these all" I meant the missing mumps builds. As neither
> blacs-mpi nor scalapack depends on mumps, I've added a hint for those
> two packages; let's see what happens in tomorrow morning's britney.
>
final: blacs-mp
On Thu, May 20, 2010 11:53, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Thu, 20 May 2010 00:09:17 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
>> * trying to update blacs-mpi from 1.1-28 to 1.1-28.2 (candidate is 370
>> days old)
>> * Updating blacs-mpi makes 1 depending packages uninstallable on i386:
>> blacs-pvm-test
>> *
On Thu, 20 May 2010 00:09:17 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> 2010/5/19 Adam C Powell IV :
> > On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 13:24 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 20:16 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
> >> > > Adam C Powel
Hi,
2010/5/19 Adam C Powell IV :
> Hi again,
>
> On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 13:24 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>> On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 20:16 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
>> > > Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>> > >> Hello,
>> > >>
>>
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 18:19 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 2010 20:31:17 +0100
> > On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 21:08 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 14:55:28 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > >
> > > > There are no open bugs against blacs-mpi, scalapack, or m
On Wed, 19 May 2010 20:31:17 +0100
> On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 21:08 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 14:55:28 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> >
> > > There are no open bugs against blacs-mpi, scalapack, or mumps.
> > >
> > > Any ideas on why they're still not transitioning?
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 21:08 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 14:55:28 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > There are no open bugs against blacs-mpi, scalapack, or mumps.
> >
> > Any ideas on why they're still not transitioning? Is there an old
> > binary package blocking mi
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 14:55:28 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> There are no open bugs against blacs-mpi, scalapack, or mumps.
>
> Any ideas on why they're still not transitioning? Is there an old
> binary package blocking migration?
>
Looks that way.
mumps (- to 4.9.2.dfsg-4)
Maintainer
Hi again,
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 13:24 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 20:16 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> blacs-mpi and scalapack have been in tran
Hello Muammar,
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 15:07 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Adam C Powell IV
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 20:16 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> >
> >> I have uploaded a revision of scalapack in mentors.d.n:
> >> http://ment
Hi Adam,
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 20:16 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
>
>> I have uploaded a revision of scalapack in mentors.d.n:
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scalapack/
>>
>> If I understood #549707 correctly scalapac
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 20:16 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> blacs-mpi and scalapack have been in transition for over four months.
> >> AFAICT, it's because of old binary packages in testi
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
> Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> blacs-mpi and scalapack have been in transition for over four months.
>> AFAICT, it's because of old binary packages in testing linked to mpich
>> and lam getting in the way. (The new packages use mpi
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Hello,
>
> blacs-mpi and scalapack have been in transition for over four months.
> AFAICT, it's because of old binary packages in testing linked to mpich
> and lam getting in the way. (The new packages use mpi-defaults.)
>
> Would it be possible to remove those binaries
Hello,
blacs-mpi and scalapack have been in transition for over four months.
AFAICT, it's because of old binary packages in testing linked to mpich
and lam getting in the way. (The new packages use mpi-defaults.)
Would it be possible to remove those binaries and hint blacs-mpi and
scalapack into
16 matches
Mail list logo
