On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 21:08 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 14:55:28 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> 
> > There are no open bugs against blacs-mpi, scalapack, or mumps.
> > 
> > Any ideas on why they're still not transitioning?  Is there an old
> > binary package blocking migration?
> > 
> Looks that way.
> 
> mumps (- to 4.9.2.dfsg-4)
>     Maintainer: Adam C. Powell, IV 
>     37 days old (needed 10 days)
>     out of date on armel: libmumps-4.9.2, libmumps-dev, libmumps-seq-4.9.2, 
> libmumps-seq-dev, mumps-test (from 4.9.2.dfsg-2)
>     out of date on hppa: libmumps-4.9.2, libmumps-dev, libmumps-seq-4.9.2, 
> libmumps-seq-dev, mumps-test (from 4.9.2.dfsg-2)
>     out of date on mips: libmumps-4.9.2, libmumps-dev, libmumps-seq-4.9.2, 
> libmumps-seq-dev, mumps-test (from 4.9.2.dfsg-2)
>     out of date on sparc: libmumps-4.9.2, libmumps-dev, libmumps-seq-4.9.2, 
> libmumps-seq-dev, mumps-test (from 4.9.2.dfsg-2)
>     Not considered

These all appear to be waiting for scotch, which FTBFS (#581381, which
Adam filed).

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1274297477.19243.1218.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net

Reply via email to