Re: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Uploading lapack 3.2.0 to unstable

2009-02-16 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Sylvestre Ledru [2009-02-16 14:58]: > > As you all know, lenny is released. It is time now to migrate lapack 3.2.0 > > to unstable. There was no shlib bump, so this migration should be safe, > > UNLESS the library has changes in the API/ABI in spite of the SONAME not > > changing. Does anyon

Re: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Uploading lapack 3.2.0 to unstable

2009-02-16 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Hello, > As you all know, lenny is released. It is time now to migrate lapack 3.2.0 > to unstable. There was no shlib bump, so this migration should be safe, > UNLESS the library has changes in the API/ABI in spite of the SONAME not > changing. Does anyone know whether this is really the case?

Uploading lapack 3.2.0 to unstable

2009-02-15 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
As you all know, lenny is released. It is time now to migrate lapack 3.2.0 to unstable. There was no shlib bump, so this migration should be safe, UNLESS the library has changes in the API/ABI in spite of the SONAME not changing. Does anyone know whether this is really the case? We should be ca