On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:53:37AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > > Well don't the buildds and other tools always prefer a real package
> > > over a Provides?
> > They'll do whatever apt-get does. Is it the case that apt-get always
> > prefers a real package? If so I have no problem unblocking
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:37:14AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:28:30AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > > > I have a few minor fixes in packages that are in unstable right now
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:37:14AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:28:30AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > > I have a few minor fixes in packages that are in unstable right now
> > > that while not release critical, I think woul
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:28:30AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > I have a few minor fixes in packages that are in unstable right now
> > that while not release critical, I think would be helpful to have in
> > the next release. I've attached patches be
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:28:30AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> I have a few minor fixes in packages that are in unstable right now
> that while not release critical, I think would be helpful to have in
> the next release. I've attached patches below for ease of reviewing.
> automake 1:1.4-p6-11 -
Hello,
I have a few minor fixes in packages that are in unstable right now
that while not release critical, I think would be helpful to have in
the next release. I've attached patches below for ease of reviewing.
automake 1:1.4-p6-11 -> 1:1.4-p6-12
This just removes the provides of automake, sin
6 matches
Mail list logo
