IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Andreas Henriksson wrote:
On mån, 2008-09-01 at 21:06 +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
- gem: multiple RC bugs with NMU proposal without comment for more
than
two months, but also seems in bad shape from looking at the
non-RC bugs: a segfault unsanswered by
Andreas Henriksson wrote:
On mån, 2008-09-01 at 21:06 +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
- gem: multiple RC bugs with NMU proposal without comment for more
than
two months, but also seems in bad shape from looking at the
non-RC bugs: a segfault unsanswered by the maintainer for
8
On mån, 2008-09-01 at 21:06 +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
>
> - gem: multiple RC bugs with NMU proposal without comment for more
> than
>two months, but also seems in bad shape from looking at the
>non-RC bugs: a segfault unsanswered by the maintainer for
>8 months, a new u
Andrew McMillan wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 21:06 +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> two removal suggestions for lenny:
>>
>> - awl: initial upload in mid-July, does not properly build from source,
>>is RC-buggy (#493687).
>
> Hi,
&g
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 21:06 +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> two removal suggestions for lenny:
>
> - awl: initial upload in mid-July, does not properly build from source,
>is RC-buggy (#493687).
Hi,
I'll fix the bugs in AWL this week but I'm happy
Hi,
two removal suggestions for lenny:
- awl: initial upload in mid-July, does not properly build from source,
is RC-buggy (#493687).
- gem: multiple RC bugs with NMU proposal without comment for more than
two months, but also seems in bad shape from looking at the
non-RC
Steve Langasek wrote:
>> # RC since long time, #188448
>> remove abuse-sdl/1:0.7.0-1
>
> Hints added.
Another removal suggestion:
With the removal of doomlegacy, doomlegacy-data become superfluous
for sarge. Probably for sid well as well, if no one wants to reupload
a fixed doomlegacy package with
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 08:00:49PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> two suggestions of me.
> # ROM, outdated, #274992
> remove python-xml-0.6/0.6.6-3
> # RC since long time, #188448
> remove abuse-sdl/1:0.7.0-1
Hints added.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digi
Hi,
two suggestions of me.
# ROM, outdated, #274992
remove python-xml-0.6/0.6.6-3
# RC since long time, #188448
remove abuse-sdl/1:0.7.0-1
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
# 20041011
# changes to 20041010:
# + add dhcping
# + remove mico (conflict bugs have been fixed in other packages)
# + add amavis-stats
# + add bbdate
# + add ccrypt
# changes to 20041009:
# + don't comment thrust out, only rdepends is a meta-package
# which can easily be fixed
# + don't comment
Updated my "virtual hint file"
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 02:58:06PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> I've gathered some removal suggestions (where I was unsure if we should
> break the depending packages I left the remove hint commented out, so
> that one can dump the foll
I've gathered some removal suggestions (where I was unsure if we should
break the depending packages I left the remove hint commented out, so
that one can dump the following list directly into a hint file)
# 20041009
# #274950, unclear license situation
# much rdepends: linda, irssi-scripts
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 02:23:03AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> # RoM: 271051
> remove xen/1.2-4.1
> # RoM (me): 270461
> # (current discussions with the maintainers indicate that the BR is
> # valid)
> remove lincvs/1.3.2-3
> # unusable in its current state: 218497
> remove lids-2.4/1.1.1r2
# RoM: 271051
remove xen/1.2-4.1
# RoM (me): 270461
# (current discussions with the maintainers indicate that the BR is
# valid)
remove lincvs/1.3.2-3
# unusable in its current state: 218497
remove lids-2.4/1.1.1r2-5
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Quoting Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 12:52:55PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > remove ccs/0.cvs20040703-2
> > # see 262925
>
> > remove libroxen-gdbmuserauth/1.0-7
> > remove libroxen-kiwilogger/1.3-4
> > remove libroxen-roxpoll-doc/1.3-5
> > remove libroxen-
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 12:52:55PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> remove ccs/0.cvs20040703-2
> # see 262925
> remove libroxen-gdbmuserauth/1.0-7
> remove libroxen-kiwilogger/1.3-4
> remove libroxen-roxpoll-doc/1.3-5
> remove libroxen-templatecreator/0.4-5
> remove roxen-fonts-iso8859-1/0-6
> re
remove ccs/0.cvs20040703-2
# see 262925
remove libroxen-gdbmuserauth/1.0-7
remove libroxen-kiwilogger/1.3-4
remove libroxen-roxpoll-doc/1.3-5
remove libroxen-templatecreator/0.4-5
remove roxen-fonts-iso8859-1/0-6
remove roxen-fonts-iso8859-2/0-6
# depend all on removed roxen, should be removed or
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 01:58:36PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> The following packages should be removed from testing on RoM:
> rrdcollect (see #267585)
> omlcs (see #269192)
> xsim (see #267291)
> removal requests filed for unstable
> (but perhaps we want to remove them from testing faster)
The following packages should be removed from testing on RoM:
rrdcollect (see #267585)
omlcs (see #269192)
xsim (see #267291)
removal requests filed for unstable
(but perhaps we want to remove them from testing faster)
vis5d
talksoup
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 12:36:16AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> remove doomlegacy/1.41release-1 doomlegacy-data/1.41release-1
> # RC bugs, licensing issues
> remove jsboard/2.0.4-1.2
> # RC bug, the patch seems somewhat dubios to me and requires testing
> # we can't provide atm
> remove mind
* Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040822 00:55]:
> remove jsboard/2.0.4-1.2
> # RC bug, the patch seems somewhat dubios to me and requires testing
> # we can't provide atm
Needs also to remove
jsboard-theme-diary-ko/0.5-1
jsboard-theme-trash-ko/0.5-1
jsboard-theme-aicom-ko/0.5-1
jsboard-the
remove doomlegacy/1.41release-1 doomlegacy-data/1.41release-1
# RC bugs, licensing issues
remove jsboard/2.0.4-1.2
# RC bug, the patch seems somewhat dubios to me and requires testing
# we can't provide atm
remove mindterm/1.2.1-10
# See #263362
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 03:54:52AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> remove roleplaying/2.0-10
> RC bug, ITA, but adopter is slow...
> remove lush/1.0+cvs.2003.07.15
> RC bug, orphaned, upstream issue, long standing.
Both hinted.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
remove roleplaying/2.0-10
RC bug, ITA, but adopter is slow...
remove lush/1.0+cvs.2003.07.15
RC bug, orphaned, upstream issue, long standing.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 06:51:27PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> # Package: pbbuttonsd (optional; Jan-Hendrik Palic)remove
> pbbuttonsd/0.5.3a-2
> # 244361 [ + ] pbbuttonsd: FTBFS: Cannot find depcomp
> # no maintainer reaction
> remove pbbuttonsd/0.5.3a-2
> # kdeutils has an unsatisfi
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 12:31:00PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > # Package: gaim (optional; Robert McQueen)remove gaim/1:0.77-1
> > # 248867 [ ] gaim: Gaim 0.77 crashes with SIGSEGV when entering
> > text when using MSN over HTTP method
>
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> # Package: gaim (optional; Robert McQueen)remove gaim/1:0.77-1
> # 248867 [ ] gaim: Gaim 0.77 crashes with SIGSEGV when entering
> text when using MSN over HTTP method
> # no maintainer reaction; no dependencies
> remove gaim/1:0.77-1
Thi
Hi,
a next round of removal suggestions. I'm fairly certain that the
removal suggestion on kdebase will not be taken (and I wouldn't put it
in a file if I could directly enter hints), and also the hint on
libdvdnav is doubtable. Also, please note, that, as always, my removal
sugge
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 10:54:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> thanks for adding the hints. I have however one question:
> * Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040614 12:25]:
> > On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 12:09:41AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > # segfaults; report from 2004-03-30
> > > # no
Hi,
thanks for adding the hints. I have however one question:
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040614 12:25]:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 12:09:41AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > # segfaults; report from 2004-03-30
> > # no maintainer reaction
> > # depends: axkit-language-htmldoc
> > # bui
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 12:09:41AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> # suggestions from 2004-06-09
> # build-dependency disappeared; report from 2004-05-02; no maintainer reaction
> # no dependencies
> # 246963
> remove dchub/0.4.5-2
Hinted.
> # security issue; report from 2004-04-27; no maintainer
Hi,
some more removal suggestions. I now put my minimum time frame to 21
days. As usual, I consider my suggestions to be a bit agressive.
# suggestions from 2004-06-09
# build-dependency disappeared; report from 2004-05-02; no maintainer reaction
# no dependencies
# 246963
remove dchub/0.4.5-2
Hi,
as just promised on IRC, here are some aggressive removal suggestions.
They probably need some re-viewing.
# kernels that have already a newer version in testing:
# ignore d-i kernel-image-2.4.25-s390/2.4.25-2
remove kernel-image-2.4.21-s390/2.4.21-2
# ignore version kernel-patch-2.4.25
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040426 04:40]:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 03:41:22PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > I was going through the RC bug list while preparing the BSP. The
> > following packages are IMHO candidates for removal from testing.
> > kernel-headers-2.2.20-sparc
> > ke
se from maintainer ("only" three weeks
> old, though).
Four weeks. Hinted.
> And there are many kernel removal suggestions (as RC bugs) for
> kernel-headers-2.2.20-sparc
> kernel-image-2.2.20-sun4dm-smp
> kernel-image-2.4.17-s390
> kernel-patch-2.2-lids
> kernel-p
/lists.debian.org/debian-release/2004/debian-release-200403/msg00121.html
for a reasoning.
And there are many kernel removal suggestions (as RC bugs) for
kernel-headers-2.2.20-sparc
kernel-image-2.2.20-sun4dm-smp
kernel-image-2.4.17-s390
kernel-patch-2.2-lids
kernel-patch-2.2.17-vm-global
kerne
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 08:20:55PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Riku Voipio wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:37:15PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >> Igor Genibel wrote:
> >> > Could you explain your motivation about dovecot ?
> >> > The upstream seems to be active and aware
> >> > ( h
Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:37:15PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> Igor Genibel wrote:
>> > Could you explain your motivation about dovecot ?
>> > The upstream seems to be active and aware
>> > ( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=225048 )
>> > and the maintain
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:37:15PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Igor Genibel wrote:
> > Could you explain your motivation about dovecot ?
> > The upstream seems to be active and aware
> > ( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=225048 )
> > and the maintainer too ...
> > The package
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 09:44:35PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>...
> | All I can see is that they will become installable in testing ass soon
> | as netsaint-plugins enters testing, and netsaint-plugins is waiting for
> | PostgreSQL.
>
> You mean nagios-plugins, right?
Yes, my fault.
> | Wha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adrian Bunk wrote:
| On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 06:46:28PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
|
|>So, the nagios mess does not look close to being fixed.
|>The following packages have no installable binaries in 'testing' (except
|>nagios-nrpe-doc, which seem
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 06:46:28PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> So, the nagios mess does not look close to being fixed.
> The following packages have no installable binaries in 'testing' (except
> nagios-nrpe-doc, which seems kind of silly when none of the other packages
> are installable.)
Wh
So, the nagios mess does not look close to being fixed.
The following packages have no installable binaries in 'testing' (except
nagios-nrpe-doc, which seems kind of silly when none of the other packages
are installable.)
remove nagios-nrpe/2.0-2
remove nagios-statd/3.09-3
remove nagios/2:1.1-11
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 01:15:55AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> remove pointless/0.4-3
> latex2html transition required, no reaction from maintainer
> (#221342)
>
> remove sear-media/0.4.6-1
> RoM (#238492)
>
> remove sear/0.4.6-3
> RoM (#238493)
All done, thanks.
--
Colin Watson
remove pointless/0.4-3
latex2html transition required, no reaction from maintainer
(#221342)
remove sear-media/0.4.6-1
RoM (#238492)
remove sear/0.4.6-3
RoM (#238493)
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 06:22:40PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> I see that all my earlier suggestions have been dealt with. Cool!
> ==> remove kmusicdb/0.8.2-4
> KDE2 dependency, uninstallable.
> ==> remove ksensors/0.7-6
> KDE2 dependency, uninstallable.
Hints added for both of the above.
Le Saturday 13 March 2004 03:37, Nathanael Nerode a écrit :
> I don't think it's reasonable to release the current version, and the bug
> has sat at 'grave' since February 11 (a full month) with no visible
> progress.
Yes, I agree. I have seen that no cvs commit was done by the upstream since
ja
Igor Genibel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Le Friday 12 March 2004 02:27, Nathanael Nerode a écrit :
>
>> remove dovecot/0.99.10.4-2
>> #225048 (data loss) and #232832
>
> Could you explain your motivation about dovecot ?
> The upstream seems to be active and awar
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 08:27:48PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> remove boot-icons/0.2
> Request of the maintainer, a.k.a. bug 235862
Done.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le Friday 12 March 2004 02:27, Nathanael Nerode a écrit :
> remove dovecot/0.99.10.4-2
> #225048 (data loss) and #232832
Could you explain your motivation about dovecot ?
The upstream seems to be active and aware
( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
remove boot-icons/0.2
Request of the maintainer, a.k.a. bug 235862
remove dovecot/0.99.10.4-2
#225048 (data loss) and #232832
--
Make sure your vote will count.
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/
I see that all my earlier suggestions have been dealt with. Cool!
==> remove kmusicdb/0.8.2-4
KDE2 dependency, uninstallable.
==> remove ksensors/0.7-6
KDE2 dependency, uninstallable.
A new version can eventually go in when the lm-sensors mess is
sorted out (which see below), but it's not clear
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ==> remove kernel-image-3.4.18-i386bf
> Boot-floppies image, useless in sarge
3.4->2.4? :)
--
bye Joerg
[..] trying to avoid extra dependencies on gnumeric is like trying to
plug one hole in the titantic with a bit of tissue paper"
pgpkmY
==> remove rocks-n-diamonds/2.0.0-0.2
May not be distributable; see bug #210233
==> remove mindi-kernel/1.0-1
No source; see bug #217160
==> remove kernel-image-3.4.18-i386bf
Boot-floppies image, useless in sarge
==> remove iraf/2.11.3-2
FTBFS, major FHS violation, binary with same name as one
54 matches
Mail list logo
