2010/5/20 Julien Cristau :
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 23:39:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
>> To clarify, by "these all" I meant the missing mumps builds. As neither
>> blacs-mpi nor scalapack depends on mumps, I've added a hint for those
>> two packages; let's see what happens in tomorrow morn
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 23:39:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> To clarify, by "these all" I meant the missing mumps builds. As neither
> blacs-mpi nor scalapack depends on mumps, I've added a hint for those
> two packages; let's see what happens in tomorrow morning's britney.
>
final: blacs-mp
On Thu, May 20, 2010 11:53, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Thu, 20 May 2010 00:09:17 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
>> * trying to update blacs-mpi from 1.1-28 to 1.1-28.2 (candidate is 370
>> days old)
>> * Updating blacs-mpi makes 1 depending packages uninstallable on i386:
>> blacs-pvm-test
>> *
On Thu, 20 May 2010 00:09:17 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> 2010/5/19 Adam C Powell IV :
> > On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 13:24 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 20:16 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
> >> > > Adam C Powel
Hi,
2010/5/19 Adam C Powell IV :
> Hi again,
>
> On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 13:24 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>> On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 20:16 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
>> > > Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>> > >> Hello,
>> > >>
>>
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 18:19 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 2010 20:31:17 +0100
> > On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 21:08 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 14:55:28 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > >
> > > > There are no open bugs against blacs-mpi, scalapack, or m
On Wed, 19 May 2010 20:31:17 +0100
> On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 21:08 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 14:55:28 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> >
> > > There are no open bugs against blacs-mpi, scalapack, or mumps.
> > >
> > > Any ideas on why they're still not transitioning?
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 21:08 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 14:55:28 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > There are no open bugs against blacs-mpi, scalapack, or mumps.
> >
> > Any ideas on why they're still not transitioning? Is there an old
> > binary package blocking mi
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 14:55:28 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> There are no open bugs against blacs-mpi, scalapack, or mumps.
>
> Any ideas on why they're still not transitioning? Is there an old
> binary package blocking migration?
>
Looks that way.
mumps (- to 4.9.2.dfsg-4)
Maintainer
Hi again,
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 13:24 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 20:16 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> blacs-mpi and scalapack have been in tran
Hello Muammar,
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 15:07 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Adam C Powell IV
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 20:16 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> >
> >> I have uploaded a revision of scalapack in mentors.d.n:
> >> http://ment
Hi Adam,
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 20:16 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
>
>> I have uploaded a revision of scalapack in mentors.d.n:
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scalapack/
>>
>> If I understood #549707 correctly scalapac
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 20:16 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> blacs-mpi and scalapack have been in transition for over four months.
> >> AFAICT, it's because of old binary packages in testi
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
> Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> blacs-mpi and scalapack have been in transition for over four months.
>> AFAICT, it's because of old binary packages in testing linked to mpich
>> and lam getting in the way. (The new packages use mpi
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Hello,
>
> blacs-mpi and scalapack have been in transition for over four months.
> AFAICT, it's because of old binary packages in testing linked to mpich
> and lam getting in the way. (The new packages use mpi-defaults.)
>
> Would it be possible to remove those binaries
15 matches
Mail list logo
