Re: [Pkg-mailman-hackers] Re: Planning for an upgrade path from etch to lenny for mailman

2007-01-24 Thread Martin Schulze
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 11:50 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Please keep in mind that the upgrade path from etch to lenny needs > > to work for etch r0 to lenny r0 as well. > > So I've understood, but cannot back this up with any documentation. > Where is this documented?

Re: Planning for an upgrade path from etch to lenny for mailman

2007-01-24 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 01:02:04PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 11:50 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: >> Please keep in mind that the upgrade path from etch to lenny needs >> to work for etch r0 to lenny r0 as well. > So I've understood, (...) Anyway, vorlon has unblocked t

Re: [Pkg-mailman-hackers] Re: Planning for an upgrade path from etch to lenny for mailman

2007-01-24 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 11:50 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > Please keep in mind that the upgrade path from etch to lenny needs > to work for etch r0 to lenny r0 as well. So I've understood, but cannot back this up with any documentation. Where is this documented? I'm curious as to the background of

Re: Planning for an upgrade path from etch to lenny for mailman

2007-01-23 Thread Martin Schulze
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > It has just come to my attention that there will be no upgrade path > from the version of Mailman in etch at this time (2.1.9) to the > version lenny will most probably have (2.2.x), but there will be an > upgrade path from the yet-unreleased 2.1.y, y>9, to 2.2.x, and an